35
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
This  chapter  consists  of  two  parts.  They  are  the  research  findings  and discussion. The research findings present the data obtained from the questionnaire
and  interview.  It  describes  the  participants ’  perception  on  peer  feedback  in
Microteaching  class.  The  discussion  presents  the  answers  to  the  two  research questions.
A. Research Findings
To  answer  the  research  questions,  the  researcher  used  questionnaire  and interview  to  gain  the  data.  The  researcher  distributed  questionnaire  to  60
participants.  However,  only  52  questionnaires  were  returned.  The  interview  was conducted  to  4  participants  which  were  chosen  randomly.  In  this  research,  the
researcher divided the perception  into two parts. The  first  is  the perception  from the participants as the evaluators a person who gives comments feedback to their
peers, and the second is the perception from the participants as the peer feedback receivers.  The  followings  are  data  presentations  from  the  questionnaires  and
interviews.
1. The Result from the Questionnaire
In  this  research,  the  researcher  divided  the  questions  into  closed-ended questions and open-ended questions. There were 18 closed-ended questions and 3
36
open-ended questions. The open-ended questions were aimed at digging out more about  the  participants
’  perception  and  participants’  suggestions  on  the  peer feedback in Microteaching class.
a. The Perception from the Participants as the Evaluators
To find out the  participants ’ perception on peer feedback especially from
the participants as evaluators, the researcher provided six statements. Those were statement number 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 18. The table below shows the distribution of
those six statements and the results.
Table 4.1. The Questionnaire Result of the Perception of Participants
Who Gave Feedback  to Their Peer No  Statements
Frequency Percentage
SD D
A SA  SD
D A
SA
1. Participant
had experienced  of  giving
feedback  to  hisher peer.
1 31
20
1.91 59.62
38.47
3. Participant
gave feedback  to  hisher
peer seriously. 3
34 15
5.77 65.38
28.85
4. Participant
gave feedback  to  hisher
peer honestly. 3
36 13
5.77 69.23
25
5. Participant
gave feedback  to  hisher
peer objectively. 3
34 15
5.77 65.38
28.85
6. Time
to do
peer feedback  in  class  was
sufficient for
the participant.
16 33
3
30.77  63.46 5.77
18.  Participant  could  be more critical to hisher
peer  performance  by doing peer feedback.
3 37
12
5.8 71.1
23.1