60 However, it still needs improvements in the implementation. It is better for
Microteaching lecturers to give more time to the students in doing peer feedback. For example, the students are given chances to see video of their peer
performance so that they can give detail comments to their peer. Peer feedback is also good to be implemented in other subjects, not only in Microteaching or in
writing classes but it may also be implemented in other subjects.
3. Suggestions for Future Researchers
The researcher admitted that this study is far from being perfect. It still has weaknesses. For those who are interested in conducting research on peer feedback
can develop the research. The next researcher may arrange deeper questions in the questionnaire to obtain detailed information. Moreover, the next researcher may
employ observation as the instrument to gather the data so that the result of the
study becomes more accurate.
61
REFERENCES
Allen, D. and Ryan, K. 1969. Microteaching. London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Altman, S., Valenzi, E. and Hadgetts, R. M. 1985. Organizational Behavior: Theory and Practice. Orlando: Academic Press, Inc.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C. and Razavieh, A. 1990. Introduction to Reseach in Education. Fourth Edition. Orlando: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C. and Razavieh, A. 2002. Introduction to Reseach in Education. Sixth Edition. Belmot: Wadsworth Group.
Best, J. W. and Kahn, J. V. 1981. Research in Education. Fourth Edition. New Delhi: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Borg, W. R., Kelley, M.L., Langer, P. and Gall, M. 1970. The Mini Course: A Microteaching Approach to Teacher Education. London: MacMillan
Educational Services.
Borg, W. R. and Gall, M. 1983. Educational Reserch: An Introduction. Fourth Edition. New York: Longman, Inc.
Brown, G. 1978. Microteaching: A Programme of Teaching Skills. London: Methuen and Co Ltd.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Marrison, K. 2000. Research Method in Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
George, J. M. and Jones, G. R. 2005. Understanding and Managing Organizational Behaviour. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
62 Gibson, J. L., Donnelly, J. H., and John M.I. 1985. Organizations: Behavior,
Structure, Process. Fifth Edition. Texas: Bussiness Publication, Inc.
Harmer, J. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Fourth Edition. New York: Pearson Education Limited.
Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. 1987. English for Specific purposes: A Learning –
centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Ltd.
Hylland, K. and Hylland, F. 2006. Feedback in Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
L. Eison, Charles, Ray, C. M. 1983. Supervision. Illinois: The Dryden Press. Leontive, A.A. 1981. Psychology and the Language Learning Process. New
York: Pergamon Press Ltd.
Lewis, M. 2003. Giving Feedback in Language Classes. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Prayitno, E. 1989. Motivasi Dalam Belajar. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Sherman, J. 1994. Feedback: Essential Writing Skills for Intermediate Students. Oxford: Institut d’etudes Theologiques.
Stone, D. R. and Nielsen, E. C. 1982. Educational Psychology: The Development of Teaching Skills. New York: Harper Row Publisher.
Wiggins, G. 1998. Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
Woolfolk, A. E. 1980. Educational Psychology. Third Edition. New Jersey:
Prentice Hall Inc.
63 Woolfolk, A. E. 1995. Educational Psychology. Sixth Edition. Boston: Allyn
Bacon.
