was modeled following the Senegal study tour in Year 2, and further follow-up with all study tour participants will take place to maximize value towards project objectives.
Training on principals of fisheries management Building on efforts in capacity building for community-based management in year 2, a 2-3 day
training module on fisheries management will be developed and conducted. This will very specifically target the need for, and the principals behind, the reform that is taking place in
Ghana. Target groups and detailed content will be decided following the governance dialog and needs analysis with stakeholders. Key messages will be captured in simplified graphic and local
language form for capacity building at the community level.
Continued facilitation of Western Region Fisheries Working Group The role of the working group will become increasingly critical as processes of designing
governance reform mature. Ensuring that the FWG take a active role in the design process
Support for the Fisheries Alliance Information sharing and support for the Fisheries Alliance is considered important to broaden
knowledge and buy-in to the reform process. The Alliance is an important ally for national level communication to promote and sustain governance reform in the fisheries sector. A 2-3day
institutional strengthening and capacity building event will be organized for the Alliance to promote broader civil society participation the governance dialogues. This will encourage civil
society voices in national level discussions of the policy papers for the consideration by government.
Information sharing and support for canoe fishermen’s council GNCFC The GNCFC made up of influential chief fishermen, fish mongers and leaders of artisanal fishing
group has been engaging stakeholders and advocating for the development of the artisanal fisheries through improved fisheries governance, The chairman of the GNCFC, WR Nana
Condua, also an Advisory Council member of the Initiative, has been encouraging the artisanal leaders regarding voluntary compliance using local drama and other communications. The
GNCFC is a platform can be used by to increase voices and constituencies among the fisher folks for reform in fisheries governance. Information sharing sessions will be organized for the
GNCFC and they then will communicate to their constituencies for grassroots support for reform.
Support and linkage development for the PCC Supporting the Platform for Coastal Communities PCC-WR to serve as a Coordinating Unit
rallying CSOs NGOs, CBOs, FBOs, Traditional Authorities, etc demanding for space for dialogue on coastal off-shore Inshore development issues will contribute to overall advocacy
for the establishment of a Coastal Commission with CSOs representation. In Year 2, PCC was given a small grant to set-up zonal structures to increase participation and coordination.
However, is it important to continue to monitor closely their activities and facilitate a vision building process to ensure that members understand their basic objective and are contributing to
it. Therefore PCC will be coached through this vision building process to develop communication linkages with other grassroots structures such as the CEMAGs already engaging
for community development around the oil find.
29
Institutional gap analysis Direction for this component in Year 3 will not become entirely evident until pathways forwards
are mapped through the governance dialog process. This may lead to identification of gaps that require additional attention, and new processes that need to be established.
Refining indicator sets and mapping critical feedback pathways Consolidation of work on the fisheries data system, community-based collection of fishery
indicators and fisher behavior should highlight critical indicators that will sustain adaptive management processes within redesigned governance system. Pathways for information flow to
facilitate appropriate response to change will be tested and documented.
Table of Key Activities and Milestones Task 1.2.2
Q1 Q2
Q3 Q4
Develop detailed annual plan for capacity building X
Convene meetings with year 2 study tour participants to consolidate learning and prepare inputs for
governance dialog X
Detailed planning and formulation of approach for community level for a
X Community fora conducted
X X
X Study tour conducted
X Training module designed
X Training module presented
X Gap analysis to review adequacy of existing
institutions to support adaptive governance X
Act on outcomes from governance dialog X
X Refine indicator analysis to provide specific data
required in the redesigned governance system X
X Continued support for Fisheries Alliance, FWG, PCC
and GNCFC X X X X
List of Key Outputs
ｸ Annual plan for capacity building ｸ Consolidated outputs from Y2 study tours
ｸ Detailed report from Y3 study tour ｸ Training materials for fisheries management module
ｸ Institutional gap analysis ｸ Brief on indicators for adaptive governance
ｸ Detailed communication linkages developed for PCC, GNCFC, FWG, Fisheries Alliance
30
1.2.3 Governance Dialog Process Activity Leader:
George Hutchful
Activity Team: David Mills, Godfred Ameyaw, Kyei Kwadwo, Donkris Mevuta
Facilitating a ‘governance dialog’ is a major pillar of the move in Year 3 to clearly articulate the way forward for governance reform. The objective is to bring together stakeholders across
multiple scales in Ghana, including experience built up through capacity building exercises and exposure visits, as well as regional and global expertise. The central objective will be to discuss,
plan and map possible pathways for implementing nested governance systems in the Western Region. The greatest challenge and the focus of this dialogue will be to define in specific terms
the roles and responsibilities of community-based groups – empowered by a specific legally binding mandate that will enable them to engage in fisheries governance in a meaningful and
effective way. One of the strategies will mobilize district level fisheries interest and facilitate communications with the district assemblies on fisheries governance. This interest group would
have the task of identification of opportunities and strategies for seeking a more presentpermanent voice on fisheries within the assemblies.
The process must be supported by a well-articulated set of goals, a consultative process of participant selection, a focused program of information sharing prior to formal dialog, in addition
to a well-planned and facilitated dialog process. This activity needs to link very strongly with capacity building efforts see activity 1.2.2 above. Key inputs to the process include information
papers on objectives of the process, change in Ghanaian fisheries, current institutional setting of fisheries governance and current biological status of the fishery. Focus groups and training
exercises with local stakeholders building an understanding of goals and the capacity to articulate issues will lead up to the dialog process. Outputs will include a policy paper outlining
critical steps to providing enabling conditions, and ways forward for nested fisheries governance in Ghana. We need explicit recognition here of linkages between fisheries and coastal
governance. Strong collaboration with the World Bank program will be sought for this activity as well. Specific tasks will include:
Legal and institutional analysis While much of the institutional setting of fisheries in Ghana is articulated in the sector review,
we now have a series of specific questions regarding the implementation of enabling conditions for community based management that need to be addressed. The degree to which this
implementation can be accommodated under existing laws needs to be set out in detail.
Provision of background documents for dialog To maximize the value of the dialog process, it is critical that all participants start with a basic
level of knowledge about the system, and external participants in particular are provided with background information on fisheries in Ghana. While the basis of the information for this has
been collected and assembled in the ‘Our Coasts’ report and the ‘Fisheries Sector Review’, there is considerable additional detail that can be added from work over the past year. Policy briefs
developed under Component 1.2.1 will provide this information
31
Governance dialog A one-week dialog between stakeholders, managers and international experts will be facilitated
early in the project year. It is envisaged that this will start with a fishing community visit lead by community members and stakeholders with the objective of providing a deeper understanding to
outside experts on the context of fishing in Ghana. This will then progress to a 3-day workshop focusing on local context, lessons from study tours and global success stories.
Policy brief on governance structure The primary output from the dialog will be the fishery-specific components of a policy brief
outlining plausible and productive designs for nested coastal and fisheries governance, institutional requirements, and the steps required to implement recommendations. It is
anticipated that this will take considerable development following the dialog, as it must be integrated with the legal and institutional analysis to map the pathway forwards.
Table of Key Activities and Milestones Task 1.2.3
Q1 Q2
Q3 Q4
Legal and institutional analysis completed X
Consultative selection of dialog participants X
Dates for dialog finalized X
Workshop with stakeholder groups held X
Background papers completed X
Dialog held X
Policy brief draft for circulation X
Policy brief released X
Draft scientific publication on consultative processes X
List of Key Outputs
ｸ Policy brief on implementation of nested governance ｸ Draft scientific paper on consultative processes in governance design
1.2.4 Promoting Compliance and Enforcement of Fisheries Laws Activity Leader: Kyei Yamoah.
Activity Team: Donkris Mevuta, Mark Fenn; Nana Efua, Richard Adupong, Kwesi Johnson
Fisheries Working Group; AFRICOMUS Navy; MCS.
Important Implementing Organizations: Fisheries Commission, Fisheries Working Group FWG, District Assemblies, Ghana National Canoe Fishermen’s Council and, the Attorney
General’s Office.
The overall goal of this element is to facilitate engagements and explore new avenues to promote voluntary compliance and enforcement of fisheries rules and regulations. The voluntary
compliance strategy will identify a group of motivated people at both the district and community scale. The approach would adopt the piloting of a fresh approach to community-based
management in two focal areas Shama and Cape Three Points. The criteria for selection will
32
