For the English Teachers of SMP BOPKRI 1 Yogyakarta

81 Fogarty, R. J. 1994. Teach for metacognitive reflection. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Fraenkel, J. R. Wallen, N. E. 2008. How to design and evaluate research in education 7 th ed.. Boston: McGraw – Hill Higher Education. Halpern, D. F. 1996. Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Harmer, J. 2007. The practice of English language teaching 4 th edition. Cambridge: Longman. Heaton, J. B. 1975. Writing English language tests. London: Longman Group Limited. Hyland, K. 2002. Teaching and researching writing. London: Pearson Education Limited. Hyland, K. 2003. Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. Hyland, K. 2007. Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Hyndman, R. J. 1995. The problem with Sturges’ rule for constructing histograms. Retrieved on 14 March 2016 from http:robjhyndman.compaperssturges.pdf Ismail, N. 2010. Exploring ESL students’ apprehension level and attitude towards academic writing. Illinois: Common Ground Publishing LLC. MacArthur, C. A., Graham S., and Fitzgerald J. 2008. Handbook of writing research. New York: The Guildford Press. Myles, J. 2002. Second language writing and research: the writing process and error analysis in students texts . Canada: Queen‟s University. Nunan, D. 2003. Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill. Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle Heinle Publishers. OMalley, J. M. 1987. The effects of training in the use of learning strategies on learning English as a second language. Cambridge: Prentice-Hall. 82 Raimes, A. 1983. Techniques in teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press. Sommers, N. 2010. Responding to student writing. National Council of Teachers of English: College Composition and Communication, Vol. 33, No. 2 May, 1982, pp. 147 –156. Sprinthall, R. C., Gregory T. S. Sirois, L. 1991. Understanding educational research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Wahyuni, H. 2000. English education study program students’ metacognitive learning strategies and reading achievements: A correlational study. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

Dokumen yang terkait

CLASSROOM TECHNIQUES TO DEVELOP STUDENTS’ ENGLISH READING SKILLS: A NATURALISTIC STUDY AT SMP NEGERI 22 Classroom Techniques To Develop Students English Reading Skills: A Naturalistic Study At Smp Negeri 22 Surakarta.

0 3 14

“CLASSROOM TECHNIQUES TO DEVELOP STUDENTS’ ENGLISH READING SKILLS: A NATURALISTIC STUDY AT SMP “Classroom Techniques To Develop Students’ English Reading Skills: A Naturalistic Study At Smp Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta”.

0 2 19

“CLASSROOM TECHNIQUES TO DEVELOP STUDENTS’ENGLISH READING SKILLS: A NATURALISTIC STUDY AT “Classroom Techniques To Develop Students’ English Reading Skills: A Naturalistic Study At Smp Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta”.

0 4 13

CLASSROOM TECHNIQUES TO DEVELOP STUDENTS’ ENGLISH WRITING SKILL: A NATURALISTIC STUDY “Classroom Techniques To Develop Students’ English Writing Skill: A Naturalistic Study At Smp Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta”.

0 3 19

LEARNING STRATEGIES TO DEVELOP SPEAKING SKILL: A CASE STUDY OF GOOD ORAL COMPETENT STUDENTS OF MADRASAH LEARNING STRATEGIES TO DEVELOP SPEAKING SKILL: A CASE STUDY OF GOOD ORAL COMPETENT STUDENTS OF MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI KARANGGEDE.

0 4 16

LEARNING STRATEGIES TO DEVELOP SPEAKING SKILL: A CASE STUDY OF GOOD ORAL LEARNING STRATEGIES TO DEVELOP SPEAKING SKILL: A CASE STUDY OF GOOD ORAL COMPETENT STUDENTS OF MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI KARANGGEDE.

0 4 16

Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and reading comprehension: A correlational study.

0 1 115

The students` motivation in learning English : a survey study at SMP BOPKRI 1 Yogyakarta.

0 1 75

A Study of using pictures to increase the students engagement for writing recount text in class 8A of SMP Pangudi Luhur 1 Yogyakarta.

0 1 206

English education study program students` metacognitive learning strategies and reading achievement : a correlational study.

0 1 95