89 One of the students called the direction as an enlightenment that finally helped the
student finished the writing. The  advantage  of  scaffolding  in  maintaining  the  pursuit  of  goal  by
Bransford, et al. 2000 is also similar to McKenzie’s theory about characteristics
of scaffolding. It is keeping students on task. McKenzie 2000 state that scaffolding is  like the guardrail  of a mountain highway that provides a pathway  or route for
motorman. Each time a student or a respondent is asked to move along a path, the steps  are  outlined  extensively  by  the  scaffolding.  These  characteristics  of
scaffolding were experienced by the students. It means maintaining the pursuit of goal can be included to the advantage of using scaffolding in learning writing.
e. Making Learners Independent
The last advantage of using scaffolding in learning writing is making leaners indepe
ndent.  The  students’  progress  toward  independence  in  learning  becomes clearer  as  the  learning  process  came  to  the  last  activity.  As  the  learning  process
came to the next step, the students became more aware and attentive to their errors. After receiving verification and clarification from the tutor as one of the scaffolds,
the writing errors in students’ recount text were decreasing. Further, in the final test, the students performed well by showing their correct answers along with critical
rationales. One student, in the FGI, already showed that what the student has learned
in scaffolding learning in English Club could help the student face an English test. The  student  could  manage  herhimself  to  accomplish  a  particular  challenge.
Besides, some other students show their independence by telling the researcher that
90 they now can rely on their own ability in writing. They no longer depend on other
people in accomplishing a task. It is clear enough for the researcher as the tutor to remove the assistance or clues or guidance from the learning process. As a result,
making  learners  independent  deserves  to  be  added  to  the  advantage  of  using scaffolding in learning writing.
To sum up, the scaffolding learning here was implemented as the answer for the  students’  difficulties  in  learning  English,  as  they  stated  in  pre-research
questionnaire.  After  offering  five  types  of  scaffolding  by  Roehler  and  Cantlon 1997 to the students, the researcher found that the students moved to the higher
level  of  English  competence,  which  is  showed  by  their  increasing  awareness, attentiveness,  understanding,  and  crticial  thinking  in  writing,  especially  in  using
writing elements. Moreover, the researcher also found that the students benefited from  the  scaffolding  learning.  The respondents  stated  6  points as  the  advantages
they felt during the learning process. Furthermore, it can be seen that the research successfully brings positive answer to both of the formulated problems.
91
CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
This chapter presents the conclusions of the research and suggestions. There are two parts in this chapter. In the first part, the researcher presents the conclusions
of  the  two  research  problems’  findings  and  discussions.  In  other  words,  the researcher  presents  the  conclusion  of  the  extent  to  which  scaffolding  as  an
instructional  strategy  could  help  students  learn  writing  and  on  the  advantages  of using scaffolding in learning writing. Then, in the second part, the research provides
some suggestions for the upcoming English Club tutors, PGSD study program, and future researchers.
A. Conclusions
This  research  aims  to  find  out  the  extent  to  which  scaffolding  as  an instructional strategy can help students learn writing and to find out the advantages
of using scaffolding in learning writing. Pertinent to the above research objectives, firstly, scaffolding as an instructional strategy could help the students to move to
the higher level of competence. It is showed by the students’ increasing awareness, attentiveness,  understanding,  and  critical  analysis  in  writing  after  they  learned
writing using scaffolding. The increasing levels are shown by the decreasing errors on  writing  elements  as  the  students  moved  to  the  last  step  of  the  scaffolding
learning process and by the students’ post-scaffolding-learning ability to provide
answer along with the rationales in the final test. Besides, the students’ increasing