Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Adopsi Teknologi Petani Dalam Penerapan Sistem Tanam Jajar Legowo 2:1

55

Lampiran 1. TINGKAT ADOPSI PETANI TERHADAP SISTEM JARWO 2:1
Sampel

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8


9

10

total

score

converate

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

1
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1

1
1
4
4
4
2
2
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
1

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1

2
3
3
3
4
1
2
2

1
1
1
1
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
3
2
4
2
2
4

2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2

1
4
4
4
4
4
1

4
1
1
1
2
4
3
2
1
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4

4
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4

1
4
4
4
4
1

1
4
1
4
1
2
4
4
2
1
4
1
1
4
4
1
4
1
2
1

4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1

1
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
4
4
2
1
1
3
3
4
4
1
4
3
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3

1
4
4
3
4
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
4
4
2
1
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1

1
4
4
4
4
2
1
4
1
1
1
1
4
4
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
1

1
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
1
2
1
4
1
4
4
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
1
2
1

1
4
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
4
4
1
2
2
4
4
1
4
2
4
2
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2

3
2
2
2
4
3
3
3
2
1
2
1
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
4
2
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2

10
35
35
34
36
14
15
31
15
12
12
16
34
35
19
15
19
18
16
36
36
18
32
16
34
16
34
36
16
32
32
32
32
34
35
35
35
29
33
18

1
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.6
1.4
1.5
3.1
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.6
3.4
3.5
1.9
1.5
1.9
1.8
1.6
3.6
3.6
1.8
3.2
1.6
3.4
1.6
3.4
3.6
1.6
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.5
2.9
3.3
1.8

0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1

Universitas Sumatera Utara

56

Lampiran 2. PENILAIAN PETANI TERHADAP PENYULUH
Sampel

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 11

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

1
4
4
4
2
1
2
2
2
4
2
1
3
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
4
4
1
4
2
3
3
2
4
3
4
1
3
4
1
4
4
1
4

1
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
1
3
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
4
4
1
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
4
1
3
4
1
4
4
1
4

1
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
2
4
2
1
3
4
1
4
1
2
1
4
3
1
4
1
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
1
4
4
1
1

1
3
4
4
4
3
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
4
1
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
1
4

1
3
4
4
4
3
2
2
2
1
2
4
3
3
1
1
3
2
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
1
4

1
3
4
4
4
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
4
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
2
3
3
2
4
4
1
4

1
4
4
4
4
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
3
4
2
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
2
3
4
2
4
4
1
4

3
4
4
4
4
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
3
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
2
3
4
2
4
4
3
2

3
3
4
4
4
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
3
3
4
1
2
3
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
2
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
3
2

3
3
4
4
2
1
1
4
2
1
1
2
3
3
4
4
3
1
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
4
4
2
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
3
2

3
4
4
4
2
1
1
4
1
1
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
3
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
1
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
4

Total

Score

converate

19
39
44
44
36
17
20
34
21
20
20
18
33
39
21
20
19
20
20
25
33
20
44
18
44
34
35
43
35
44
33
39
20
33
39
21
44
44
19
35

1.7
3.5
4.0
4.0
3.3
1.5
1.8
3.1
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.6
3.0
3.5
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.8
2.3
3.0
1.8
4.0
1.6
4.0
3.1
3.2
3.9
3.2
4.0
3.0
3.5
1.8
3.0
3.5
1.9
4.0
4.0
1.7
3.2

0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1

Universitas Sumatera Utara

57

Lampiran 3.
Sampel
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

KARAKTERISTIK PETANI

Tingkat
Adopsi
0
1
1
1
1

45
55
48
51
47

Pendapatan
1
1
1
2
1

Pendidikan
9
6
9
6
6

Penyuluhan
0
0
1
1
1

Biaya Tenaga
Kerja
0
0
1
1
1

0
0

36
25

1
1

9
12

0
0

0
0

1
0

47
55

2
1

9
6

1
1

1
1

0
0
0
1

53
49
56
48

1
2
1
2

6
12
6
9

1
0
0
0

1
0
0
1

1
0
0
0
0

51
47
36
58
47

1
2
2
1
1

6
9
12
6
6

0
1
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
0

0
0
1
0
1
0
1

24
53
60
49
52
48
49

1
1
1
1
1
1
2

12
6
6
6
6
6
6

0
0
1
0
1
0
0

0
0
1
0
1
0
0

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1

42
58
19
57
55
60
47
28
50
58
51
62
44

2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1

12
6
6
6
6
6
9
9
6
6
9
6
9

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1

0
1

45
52

2
2

9
6

0
1

0
1

umur

Universitas Sumatera Utara

58

Lampiran 4.

HASIL OUTPUT ANALISIS KARAKTERISTIK
Coefficientsa

Unstandardized Standardized

95% Confidence

Collinearity
Correlations

Coefficients

Coefficients

Model

Interval for B
t

Lower
B

Std. Error

Statistics

Sig.
Upper Zero-

Beta

Partial Part Tolerance VIF
Bound Bound order

(Constant)

.726

.692

1.049

.301

-.680

2.133

x1

.000

.010

.008

.040

.968

-.019

.020

.293

.007

.006

.574

1.741

x2

.310

.171

.292

1.808

.079

-.038

.658

.198

.296

.262

.807

1.240

x3

-.087

.047

-.369

-1.839

.075

-.182

.009

-.324

-.301

.522

1.917

-.394

-1.192

.242 -1.095

.285

.192

5.206

.191

5.233

-

1

.266
-

x4

-.405

.340

.182

-.200
.173

x5

.622

.352

.586

1.768

.086

-.093

1.337

.306

.290

.256

a. Dependent
Variable: y

Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
Selected Cases

a

N
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
Total

Unselected Cases
Total

Percent
40

100.0

0

.0

40

100.0

0

.0

40

100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value

Internal Value

RENDAH

0

TINGGI

1

BLOCK 0 : BEGINNING BLOCK

Universitas Sumatera Utara

59

a,b

Classification Table

Predicted
Y
Observed
Step 0

Y

RENDAH

TINGGI

Percentage Correct

RENDAH

0

18

.0

TINGGI

0

22

100.0

Overall Percentage

55.0

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation
B
Step 0

Constant

S.E.
.201

Wald

.318

df

.399

Sig.
1

Exp(B)

.528

1.222

Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0

Variables

df

Sig.

X1

3.442

1

.064

X2(1)

1.576

1

.209

X3

4.188

1

.041

X4(1)

3.740

1

.053

X5(1)

1.212

1

.271

11.516

5

.042

Overall Statistics

BLOCK 1 : Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square
Step 1

df

Sig.

Step

13.300

5

.021

Block

13.300

5

.021

Model

13.300

5

.021

Universitas Sumatera Utara

60

Model Summary
Step

-2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square
a

1

41.751

Nagelkerke R Square

.283

.378

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than
.001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Step

Chi-square

1

df

Sig.

5.368

8

.718

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Y = RENDAH
Observed
Step 1

Y = TINGGI

Expected

Observed

Expected

Total

1

4

3.691

0

.309

4

2

3

3.112

1

.888

4

3

2

2.689

2

1.311

4

4

3

1.995

1

2.005

4

5

2

1.891

2

2.109

4

6

1

1.864

3

2.136

4

7

1

1.215

3

2.785

4

8

1

.704

3

3.296

4

9

0

.548

4

3.452

4

10

1

.291

3

3.709

4

Classification Table

a

Predicted
Y
Observed
Step 1

Y

RENDAH
RENDAH
TINGGI

Overall Percentage

TINGGI

Percentage Correct

10

8

55.6

3

19

86.4
72.5

a. The cut value is .500

Universitas Sumatera Utara

61

Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
a

Step 1 X1

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

Lower

Upper

.002

.047

.002

1

.964

1.002

.914

1.099

-2.075

1.084

3.665

1

.005

.126

.015

1.051

-.456

.263

2.999

1

.008

.634

.378

1.062

X4(1)

-1.437

.882

2.655

1

.103

.238

.042

1.339

X5(1)

1.022

.922

1.229

1

.268

2.779

.456

16.922

Constant

5.227

4.260

1.505

1

.220 186.169

X2(1)
X3

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: X1, X2, X3, X4,
X5.

Correlation Matrix
Constant
Step 1

Constant

X1

X2(1)

X3

X4(1)

X5(1)

1.000

-.816

-.583

-.841

-.231

-.154

X1

-.816

1.000

.221

.475

.143

-.003

X2(1)

-.583

.221

1.000

.595

.125

-.080

X3

-.841

.475

.595

1.000

.030

.075

X4(1)

-.231

.143

.125

.030

1.000

-.197

X5(1)

-.154

-.003

-.080

.075

-.197

1.000

Universitas Sumatera Utara

62

Step number: 1
Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities
8 ┼



Ň

Ň

Ň
F

Ň

R

6 ┼

Ň
Ň

Ň

E

Ň

Q

Ň

U

4 ┼

E

Ň

N

Ň

C

Ň

Y

2 ┼

R

Ň

R

T

T



T

Ň

T

Ň

T

Ň

T



T

Ň

T

T

Ň

T

T

Ň

T

T



T
T
T
T
R
R
RT
RT
T

T

RT

T
T
RT
T
T
Ň
Ň
R RR
R
RR
RT
R
R
TRRT
R
T
T
R
TR T
T Ň
Ň
R RR
R
RR
RT
R
R
TRRT
R
T
T
R
TR T
T Ň
Predicted ─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼───
──────┼─────────┼─────────┼──────────
Prob:
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1
Group:
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
T

Predicted Probability is of Membership for TINGGI The
Cut Value is .50
Symbols: R - RENDAH
T - TINGGI
Each Symbol Represents .5 Cases.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

63

Lampiran 5.

KEGIATAN PENELITIAN

Gambar 1. Wawancara langsung dengan petani dilakukan diperbatasan
antara

Gambar 2. Wawancara langsung dengan petani

Universitas Sumatera Utara

64

Gambar 3. Cara penyiangan yang dilakukan pada sistem tanam Jajar
legowo 2:1

Gambar 4. Display Tanaman Padi pada sistem tanam Jajar Legowo 2 :1

Universitas Sumatera Utara

65

Gambar 5. Wawancara langsung dan menjawab quisoner dengan petani
Dilakukan di rumah ketua kelompok tani

Gambar 6. Hasil panen petani dengan menggunakn sistem tanam Jarwo 2 :1

Universitas Sumatera Utara

66

Gambar 7. Panen padi mencapai 7 ton/ha

Gambar 8. Kesibukan petani pada saat panen dengan menggunakan
sistem Tanam Jarwo 2:1

Universitas Sumatera Utara