Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Adopsi Teknologi Petani Dalam Penerapan Sistem Tanam Jajar Legowo 2:1
55
Lampiran 1. TINGKAT ADOPSI PETANI TERHADAP SISTEM JARWO 2:1
Sampel
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
total
score
converate
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
1
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
3
3
4
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
3
2
4
2
2
4
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
1
1
2
4
3
2
1
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
1
4
1
2
4
4
2
1
4
1
1
4
4
1
4
1
2
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
4
4
2
1
1
3
3
4
4
1
4
3
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
1
4
4
3
4
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
4
4
2
1
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
2
1
4
1
1
1
1
4
4
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
1
2
1
4
1
4
4
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
1
2
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
4
4
1
2
2
4
4
1
4
2
4
2
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
3
2
2
2
4
3
3
3
2
1
2
1
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
4
2
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
10
35
35
34
36
14
15
31
15
12
12
16
34
35
19
15
19
18
16
36
36
18
32
16
34
16
34
36
16
32
32
32
32
34
35
35
35
29
33
18
1
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.6
1.4
1.5
3.1
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.6
3.4
3.5
1.9
1.5
1.9
1.8
1.6
3.6
3.6
1.8
3.2
1.6
3.4
1.6
3.4
3.6
1.6
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.5
2.9
3.3
1.8
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
56
Lampiran 2. PENILAIAN PETANI TERHADAP PENYULUH
Sampel
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
1
4
4
4
2
1
2
2
2
4
2
1
3
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
4
4
1
4
2
3
3
2
4
3
4
1
3
4
1
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
1
3
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
4
4
1
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
4
1
3
4
1
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
2
4
2
1
3
4
1
4
1
2
1
4
3
1
4
1
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
1
4
4
1
1
1
3
4
4
4
3
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
4
1
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
1
4
1
3
4
4
4
3
2
2
2
1
2
4
3
3
1
1
3
2
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
1
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
4
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
2
3
3
2
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
4
4
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
3
4
2
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
2
3
4
2
4
4
1
4
3
4
4
4
4
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
3
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
2
3
4
2
4
4
3
2
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
3
3
4
1
2
3
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
2
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
3
2
3
3
4
4
2
1
1
4
2
1
1
2
3
3
4
4
3
1
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
4
4
2
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
3
2
3
4
4
4
2
1
1
4
1
1
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
3
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
1
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
Total
Score
converate
19
39
44
44
36
17
20
34
21
20
20
18
33
39
21
20
19
20
20
25
33
20
44
18
44
34
35
43
35
44
33
39
20
33
39
21
44
44
19
35
1.7
3.5
4.0
4.0
3.3
1.5
1.8
3.1
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.6
3.0
3.5
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.8
2.3
3.0
1.8
4.0
1.6
4.0
3.1
3.2
3.9
3.2
4.0
3.0
3.5
1.8
3.0
3.5
1.9
4.0
4.0
1.7
3.2
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
57
Lampiran 3.
Sampel
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
KARAKTERISTIK PETANI
Tingkat
Adopsi
0
1
1
1
1
45
55
48
51
47
Pendapatan
1
1
1
2
1
Pendidikan
9
6
9
6
6
Penyuluhan
0
0
1
1
1
Biaya Tenaga
Kerja
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
36
25
1
1
9
12
0
0
0
0
1
0
47
55
2
1
9
6
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
53
49
56
48
1
2
1
2
6
12
6
9
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
51
47
36
58
47
1
2
2
1
1
6
9
12
6
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
24
53
60
49
52
48
49
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
42
58
19
57
55
60
47
28
50
58
51
62
44
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
6
6
6
6
6
9
9
6
6
9
6
9
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
45
52
2
2
9
6
0
1
0
1
umur
Universitas Sumatera Utara
58
Lampiran 4.
HASIL OUTPUT ANALISIS KARAKTERISTIK
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
95% Confidence
Collinearity
Correlations
Coefficients
Coefficients
Model
Interval for B
t
Lower
B
Std. Error
Statistics
Sig.
Upper Zero-
Beta
Partial Part Tolerance VIF
Bound Bound order
(Constant)
.726
.692
1.049
.301
-.680
2.133
x1
.000
.010
.008
.040
.968
-.019
.020
.293
.007
.006
.574
1.741
x2
.310
.171
.292
1.808
.079
-.038
.658
.198
.296
.262
.807
1.240
x3
-.087
.047
-.369
-1.839
.075
-.182
.009
-.324
-.301
.522
1.917
-.394
-1.192
.242 -1.095
.285
.192
5.206
.191
5.233
-
1
.266
-
x4
-.405
.340
.182
-.200
.173
x5
.622
.352
.586
1.768
.086
-.093
1.337
.306
.290
.256
a. Dependent
Variable: y
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
Selected Cases
a
N
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
Total
Unselected Cases
Total
Percent
40
100.0
0
.0
40
100.0
0
.0
40
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
RENDAH
0
TINGGI
1
BLOCK 0 : BEGINNING BLOCK
Universitas Sumatera Utara
59
a,b
Classification Table
Predicted
Y
Observed
Step 0
Y
RENDAH
TINGGI
Percentage Correct
RENDAH
0
18
.0
TINGGI
0
22
100.0
Overall Percentage
55.0
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 0
Constant
S.E.
.201
Wald
.318
df
.399
Sig.
1
Exp(B)
.528
1.222
Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0
Variables
df
Sig.
X1
3.442
1
.064
X2(1)
1.576
1
.209
X3
4.188
1
.041
X4(1)
3.740
1
.053
X5(1)
1.212
1
.271
11.516
5
.042
Overall Statistics
BLOCK 1 : Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square
Step 1
df
Sig.
Step
13.300
5
.021
Block
13.300
5
.021
Model
13.300
5
.021
Universitas Sumatera Utara
60
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
a
1
41.751
Nagelkerke R Square
.283
.378
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than
.001.
Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Step
Chi-square
1
df
Sig.
5.368
8
.718
Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Y = RENDAH
Observed
Step 1
Y = TINGGI
Expected
Observed
Expected
Total
1
4
3.691
0
.309
4
2
3
3.112
1
.888
4
3
2
2.689
2
1.311
4
4
3
1.995
1
2.005
4
5
2
1.891
2
2.109
4
6
1
1.864
3
2.136
4
7
1
1.215
3
2.785
4
8
1
.704
3
3.296
4
9
0
.548
4
3.452
4
10
1
.291
3
3.709
4
Classification Table
a
Predicted
Y
Observed
Step 1
Y
RENDAH
RENDAH
TINGGI
Overall Percentage
TINGGI
Percentage Correct
10
8
55.6
3
19
86.4
72.5
a. The cut value is .500
Universitas Sumatera Utara
61
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
a
Step 1 X1
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Lower
Upper
.002
.047
.002
1
.964
1.002
.914
1.099
-2.075
1.084
3.665
1
.005
.126
.015
1.051
-.456
.263
2.999
1
.008
.634
.378
1.062
X4(1)
-1.437
.882
2.655
1
.103
.238
.042
1.339
X5(1)
1.022
.922
1.229
1
.268
2.779
.456
16.922
Constant
5.227
4.260
1.505
1
.220 186.169
X2(1)
X3
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: X1, X2, X3, X4,
X5.
Correlation Matrix
Constant
Step 1
Constant
X1
X2(1)
X3
X4(1)
X5(1)
1.000
-.816
-.583
-.841
-.231
-.154
X1
-.816
1.000
.221
.475
.143
-.003
X2(1)
-.583
.221
1.000
.595
.125
-.080
X3
-.841
.475
.595
1.000
.030
.075
X4(1)
-.231
.143
.125
.030
1.000
-.197
X5(1)
-.154
-.003
-.080
.075
-.197
1.000
Universitas Sumatera Utara
62
Step number: 1
Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities
8 ┼
┼
Ň
Ň
Ň
F
Ň
R
6 ┼
Ň
Ň
Ň
E
Ň
Q
Ň
U
4 ┼
E
Ň
N
Ň
C
Ň
Y
2 ┼
R
Ň
R
T
T
┼
T
Ň
T
Ň
T
Ň
T
┼
T
Ň
T
T
Ň
T
T
Ň
T
T
┼
T
T
T
T
R
R
RT
RT
T
T
RT
T
T
RT
T
T
Ň
Ň
R RR
R
RR
RT
R
R
TRRT
R
T
T
R
TR T
T Ň
Ň
R RR
R
RR
RT
R
R
TRRT
R
T
T
R
TR T
T Ň
Predicted ─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼───
──────┼─────────┼─────────┼──────────
Prob:
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1
Group:
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
T
Predicted Probability is of Membership for TINGGI The
Cut Value is .50
Symbols: R - RENDAH
T - TINGGI
Each Symbol Represents .5 Cases.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
63
Lampiran 5.
KEGIATAN PENELITIAN
Gambar 1. Wawancara langsung dengan petani dilakukan diperbatasan
antara
Gambar 2. Wawancara langsung dengan petani
Universitas Sumatera Utara
64
Gambar 3. Cara penyiangan yang dilakukan pada sistem tanam Jajar
legowo 2:1
Gambar 4. Display Tanaman Padi pada sistem tanam Jajar Legowo 2 :1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
65
Gambar 5. Wawancara langsung dan menjawab quisoner dengan petani
Dilakukan di rumah ketua kelompok tani
Gambar 6. Hasil panen petani dengan menggunakn sistem tanam Jarwo 2 :1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
66
Gambar 7. Panen padi mencapai 7 ton/ha
Gambar 8. Kesibukan petani pada saat panen dengan menggunakan
sistem Tanam Jarwo 2:1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 1. TINGKAT ADOPSI PETANI TERHADAP SISTEM JARWO 2:1
Sampel
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
total
score
converate
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
1
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
3
3
4
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
3
2
4
2
2
4
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
1
1
2
4
3
2
1
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
1
4
1
2
4
4
2
1
4
1
1
4
4
1
4
1
2
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
4
4
2
1
1
3
3
4
4
1
4
3
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
1
4
4
3
4
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
4
4
2
1
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
2
1
4
1
1
1
1
4
4
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
1
2
1
4
1
4
4
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
1
2
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
4
4
1
2
2
4
4
1
4
2
4
2
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
3
2
2
2
4
3
3
3
2
1
2
1
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
4
2
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
10
35
35
34
36
14
15
31
15
12
12
16
34
35
19
15
19
18
16
36
36
18
32
16
34
16
34
36
16
32
32
32
32
34
35
35
35
29
33
18
1
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.6
1.4
1.5
3.1
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.6
3.4
3.5
1.9
1.5
1.9
1.8
1.6
3.6
3.6
1.8
3.2
1.6
3.4
1.6
3.4
3.6
1.6
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.5
2.9
3.3
1.8
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
56
Lampiran 2. PENILAIAN PETANI TERHADAP PENYULUH
Sampel
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
1
4
4
4
2
1
2
2
2
4
2
1
3
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
4
4
1
4
2
3
3
2
4
3
4
1
3
4
1
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
1
3
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
4
4
1
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
4
1
3
4
1
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
2
4
2
1
3
4
1
4
1
2
1
4
3
1
4
1
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
1
4
4
1
1
1
3
4
4
4
3
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
4
1
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
1
4
1
3
4
4
4
3
2
2
2
1
2
4
3
3
1
1
3
2
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
1
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
4
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
2
3
3
2
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
4
4
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
3
4
2
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
2
3
4
2
4
4
1
4
3
4
4
4
4
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
3
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
2
3
4
2
4
4
3
2
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
3
3
4
1
2
3
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
3
4
2
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
3
2
3
3
4
4
2
1
1
4
2
1
1
2
3
3
4
4
3
1
2
2
3
1
4
2
4
4
4
4
2
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
4
4
3
2
3
4
4
4
2
1
1
4
1
1
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
3
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
1
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
Total
Score
converate
19
39
44
44
36
17
20
34
21
20
20
18
33
39
21
20
19
20
20
25
33
20
44
18
44
34
35
43
35
44
33
39
20
33
39
21
44
44
19
35
1.7
3.5
4.0
4.0
3.3
1.5
1.8
3.1
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.6
3.0
3.5
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.8
2.3
3.0
1.8
4.0
1.6
4.0
3.1
3.2
3.9
3.2
4.0
3.0
3.5
1.8
3.0
3.5
1.9
4.0
4.0
1.7
3.2
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
57
Lampiran 3.
Sampel
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
KARAKTERISTIK PETANI
Tingkat
Adopsi
0
1
1
1
1
45
55
48
51
47
Pendapatan
1
1
1
2
1
Pendidikan
9
6
9
6
6
Penyuluhan
0
0
1
1
1
Biaya Tenaga
Kerja
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
36
25
1
1
9
12
0
0
0
0
1
0
47
55
2
1
9
6
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
53
49
56
48
1
2
1
2
6
12
6
9
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
51
47
36
58
47
1
2
2
1
1
6
9
12
6
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
24
53
60
49
52
48
49
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
42
58
19
57
55
60
47
28
50
58
51
62
44
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
6
6
6
6
6
9
9
6
6
9
6
9
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
45
52
2
2
9
6
0
1
0
1
umur
Universitas Sumatera Utara
58
Lampiran 4.
HASIL OUTPUT ANALISIS KARAKTERISTIK
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
95% Confidence
Collinearity
Correlations
Coefficients
Coefficients
Model
Interval for B
t
Lower
B
Std. Error
Statistics
Sig.
Upper Zero-
Beta
Partial Part Tolerance VIF
Bound Bound order
(Constant)
.726
.692
1.049
.301
-.680
2.133
x1
.000
.010
.008
.040
.968
-.019
.020
.293
.007
.006
.574
1.741
x2
.310
.171
.292
1.808
.079
-.038
.658
.198
.296
.262
.807
1.240
x3
-.087
.047
-.369
-1.839
.075
-.182
.009
-.324
-.301
.522
1.917
-.394
-1.192
.242 -1.095
.285
.192
5.206
.191
5.233
-
1
.266
-
x4
-.405
.340
.182
-.200
.173
x5
.622
.352
.586
1.768
.086
-.093
1.337
.306
.290
.256
a. Dependent
Variable: y
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
Selected Cases
a
N
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
Total
Unselected Cases
Total
Percent
40
100.0
0
.0
40
100.0
0
.0
40
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
RENDAH
0
TINGGI
1
BLOCK 0 : BEGINNING BLOCK
Universitas Sumatera Utara
59
a,b
Classification Table
Predicted
Y
Observed
Step 0
Y
RENDAH
TINGGI
Percentage Correct
RENDAH
0
18
.0
TINGGI
0
22
100.0
Overall Percentage
55.0
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 0
Constant
S.E.
.201
Wald
.318
df
.399
Sig.
1
Exp(B)
.528
1.222
Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0
Variables
df
Sig.
X1
3.442
1
.064
X2(1)
1.576
1
.209
X3
4.188
1
.041
X4(1)
3.740
1
.053
X5(1)
1.212
1
.271
11.516
5
.042
Overall Statistics
BLOCK 1 : Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square
Step 1
df
Sig.
Step
13.300
5
.021
Block
13.300
5
.021
Model
13.300
5
.021
Universitas Sumatera Utara
60
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
a
1
41.751
Nagelkerke R Square
.283
.378
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than
.001.
Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Step
Chi-square
1
df
Sig.
5.368
8
.718
Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Y = RENDAH
Observed
Step 1
Y = TINGGI
Expected
Observed
Expected
Total
1
4
3.691
0
.309
4
2
3
3.112
1
.888
4
3
2
2.689
2
1.311
4
4
3
1.995
1
2.005
4
5
2
1.891
2
2.109
4
6
1
1.864
3
2.136
4
7
1
1.215
3
2.785
4
8
1
.704
3
3.296
4
9
0
.548
4
3.452
4
10
1
.291
3
3.709
4
Classification Table
a
Predicted
Y
Observed
Step 1
Y
RENDAH
RENDAH
TINGGI
Overall Percentage
TINGGI
Percentage Correct
10
8
55.6
3
19
86.4
72.5
a. The cut value is .500
Universitas Sumatera Utara
61
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
a
Step 1 X1
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Lower
Upper
.002
.047
.002
1
.964
1.002
.914
1.099
-2.075
1.084
3.665
1
.005
.126
.015
1.051
-.456
.263
2.999
1
.008
.634
.378
1.062
X4(1)
-1.437
.882
2.655
1
.103
.238
.042
1.339
X5(1)
1.022
.922
1.229
1
.268
2.779
.456
16.922
Constant
5.227
4.260
1.505
1
.220 186.169
X2(1)
X3
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: X1, X2, X3, X4,
X5.
Correlation Matrix
Constant
Step 1
Constant
X1
X2(1)
X3
X4(1)
X5(1)
1.000
-.816
-.583
-.841
-.231
-.154
X1
-.816
1.000
.221
.475
.143
-.003
X2(1)
-.583
.221
1.000
.595
.125
-.080
X3
-.841
.475
.595
1.000
.030
.075
X4(1)
-.231
.143
.125
.030
1.000
-.197
X5(1)
-.154
-.003
-.080
.075
-.197
1.000
Universitas Sumatera Utara
62
Step number: 1
Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities
8 ┼
┼
Ň
Ň
Ň
F
Ň
R
6 ┼
Ň
Ň
Ň
E
Ň
Q
Ň
U
4 ┼
E
Ň
N
Ň
C
Ň
Y
2 ┼
R
Ň
R
T
T
┼
T
Ň
T
Ň
T
Ň
T
┼
T
Ň
T
T
Ň
T
T
Ň
T
T
┼
T
T
T
T
R
R
RT
RT
T
T
RT
T
T
RT
T
T
Ň
Ň
R RR
R
RR
RT
R
R
TRRT
R
T
T
R
TR T
T Ň
Ň
R RR
R
RR
RT
R
R
TRRT
R
T
T
R
TR T
T Ň
Predicted ─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼───
──────┼─────────┼─────────┼──────────
Prob:
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1
Group:
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
T
Predicted Probability is of Membership for TINGGI The
Cut Value is .50
Symbols: R - RENDAH
T - TINGGI
Each Symbol Represents .5 Cases.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
63
Lampiran 5.
KEGIATAN PENELITIAN
Gambar 1. Wawancara langsung dengan petani dilakukan diperbatasan
antara
Gambar 2. Wawancara langsung dengan petani
Universitas Sumatera Utara
64
Gambar 3. Cara penyiangan yang dilakukan pada sistem tanam Jajar
legowo 2:1
Gambar 4. Display Tanaman Padi pada sistem tanam Jajar Legowo 2 :1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
65
Gambar 5. Wawancara langsung dan menjawab quisoner dengan petani
Dilakukan di rumah ketua kelompok tani
Gambar 6. Hasil panen petani dengan menggunakn sistem tanam Jarwo 2 :1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
66
Gambar 7. Panen padi mencapai 7 ton/ha
Gambar 8. Kesibukan petani pada saat panen dengan menggunakan
sistem Tanam Jarwo 2:1
Universitas Sumatera Utara