Daniel acta 9. 99KB Jun 04 2011 12:08:35 AM
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS
No 9/2005
THE UNIVALENT CONDITION FOR AN INTEGRAL
OPERATOR
ON THE CLASSES S (α) AND T2
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz
Abstract.In this paper we present a few conditions of univalency for the
operator Fα,β on the classes of the univalent functions S (p) and T2 . These are
actually generalizations(extensions) of certain results published in the paper
[1].
AMS 2000 Subject Classification: 30C45.
Keywords and phrases: Unit disk, analytical function, univalent function,integral operator.
1.Introduction
Let be the class of analytical functions, A = {f : f = z + a2 z 2 + ...} , z ∈ U ,
where U is the unit disk , U = {z : |z| < 1} and denote S the class of univalent
functions in the unit disk.
Let p the real number with the property 0 < p ≤ 2. We define the class
S (p) as the class
of the functions f ∈ A, that satisfy the conditions f (z) 6= 0
′′
and (z/f (z)) ≤ p, z ∈ U and if f ∈ S (p) then the following property is true
2 ′
z f (z)
2
f 2 (z) − 1 ≤ p |z| , z ∈ U, relation proved in [3].
We denote
2 ′ with T2 the class of the univalent functions that satisfy the
(z)
condition zf 2f(z)
− 1 < 1, z ∈ U , and also have the property f ′′ (0) = 0.
These functions have the form f = z + a3 z 3 + a4 z 4 + .... For 0 < µ < 1 we have
a subclass of functions
by Tµ,2 , containing the functions f ∈ T2 that
2 denoted
z f ′ (z)
satisfy the property f 2 (z) − 1 < µ < 1, z ∈ U .
Next we present a few well known results related to these classes, results
on which shall rely in this paper.
63
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
The Schwartz Lemma. Let the analytic function g be regular in the unit
disc U and g (0) = 0. If |g (z)| ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U, then
|g (z)| ≤ |z| , ∀z ∈ U
(1)
and equality holds only if g (z) = εz, where |ε| = 1.
Theorem 1.[2]. Let α ∈ C, Reα > 0 and f ∈ A. If
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
zf ′′ (z)
′
≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U
f (z)
(2)
then ∀β ∈, Reβ ≥ Reα, the function
Fβ (z) = β
Zz
0
1/β
tβ−1 f ′ (t) dt
(3)
is univalent.
Theorem 2.[1]. Let fi ∈T2 , fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 + ..., ∀i = 1, 2, so that
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
6
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
(4)
If |fi (z)| ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
z
Z
Fα,β (z) = β
tβ−1
0
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
·
f2 (t)
t
!1
1
β
α
dt ∈ S.
(5)
Theorem 3.[1]. Let fi ∈T2,µ , fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 + ..., ∀i = 1, 2, so that
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
2 (µ + 2)
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
(6)
If |fi (z)| ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
z
Z
Fα,β (z) = β
0
tβ−1
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
·
f2 (t)
t
!1
α
1
β
dt ∈ S.
(7)
Theorem 4.[1]. Let fi ∈S (p) , 0 < p < 2, fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 + ..., ∀i =
1, 2, so that
64
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
2 (p + 2)
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
(8)
If |fi (z)| ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
z
Z
Fα,β (z) = β
tβ−1
0
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
·
f2 (t)
t
!1
1
β
α
2.Main results
dt ∈ S.
(9)
Theorem 5. Let M ≥ 1,fi ∈T2 , fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 + ..., ∀i = 1, 2, so
that
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
(4M + 2)
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
(10)
If |fi (z)| ≤ M, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
Fα,β (z) =
Proof.
z
Z
β
tβ−1
0
f1 (t)
t
We consider the function h (z) =
!1
α
f2 (t)
·
t
Rz f1 (t) α1
t
0
·
!1
1
β
α
f2 (t)
t
dt
1
α
∈ S.
(11)
dt.
We observe that h (0) = h′ (0) − 1 = 0.
By calculating the derivatives of the order I and II for this function we
obtain:
′
h (z) =
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
f2 (t)
·
t
!1
α
(12)
respectively
h′′ (z) =
1
1 ′
h (z) · B1 + h′ (z) · B2
α
α
where
65
(13)
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
Bk =
z
zfk′ (z) − fk (z)
·
, k = 1, 2.
fk (z)
z2
!
We calculate the fraction
′′
zh (z)
=
h′ (z)
zh′′ (z)
h′ (z)
z · α1 h′ (z) ·
(14)
and we obtain:
2
P
k=1
h′ (z)
Bk
2
1 X
Bk , ∀z ∈ U.
=z· ·
α k=1
(15)
Replacing Bk , k = 1, 2, in formula (15) we obtain:
1
zh′′ (z)
=
′
h (z)
α
zf1′ (z)
1
−1 +
f1 (z)
α
!
zf2′ (z)
−1 .
f2 (z)
!
(16)
We evaluate the modulus and we multiply in both terms of the relation
2Reα
(16) with 1−|z|
, obtain:
Reα
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
!
2
zh′′ (z)
z 2 f ′ (z) |f (z)|
1 − |z|2Reα X
i
i
′
≤
+1 .
h (z)
|α| Reα i=1 fi2 (z) |z|
(17)
Because |fi (z)| ≤ M, ∀z ∈ U , ∀i = 1, 2 and applying Schwarz Lemma we
obtain that
|fi (z)|
≤ M, ∀z ∈ U, ∀i = 1, 2.
|z|
(18)
We apply this relation in the above inequality and we obtain:
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
But
!
2
z 2 f ′ (z)
zh′′ (z)
1 − |z|2Reα X
i
′
≤
M + 1 .
h (z)
|α| Reα i=1 fi2 (z)
z 2 f ′ (z)
z 2 f ′ (z)
z 2 f ′ (z)
i
i
i
= 2
2
− 1 + 1 ≤ 2
− 1 + 1, ∀z ∈ U, ∀i = 1, 2.
fi (z)
fi (z)
fi (z)
2 ′
(z)
Because f ∈ T2 , so zf 2f(z)
− 1 < 1.
Applying this property and (20) in (19), obtain that:
66
(19)
(20)
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
2Reα
1 − |z|
Reα
2Reα
zh′′ (z)
(4M + 2)
1
−
|z|
(4M + 2)
′
≤
≤
, ∀z ∈ U.
h (z)
|α| Reα
|α| Reα
Because Reα >
(4M +2)
,
|α|
(21)
we obtain that
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
zh′′ (z)
′
≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U.
h (z)
(22)
Applying Theorem 1 we obtain that Fα,β ∈ S.
Remark. Theorem 5 is a generalization of the Theorem 2.
Theorem 6. Let M ≥ 1, fi ∈T2,µ , fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 + ..., ∀i = 1, 2,
so that
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
2 (µM + M + 1)
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
(23)
If |fi (z)| ≤ M, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
z
Z
Fα,β (z) = β
0
tβ−1
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
·
f2 (t)
t
!1
α
1
β
dt ∈ S.
(24)
Proof. Considering the same steps as in the above proof we obtain:
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
!
2
zh′′ (z)
z 2 f ′ (z)
1 − |z|2Reα X
i
− 1 M + M + 1 .
′
≤
h (z)
|α| Reα i=1 fi2 (z)
(25)
2 ′ (z)
− 1 < µ, ∀z ∈ U.
But f ∈ T2,µ , which implies that zf 2f(z)
In these conditions we obtain:
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
zh′′ (z)
2 (µM + M + 1)
, ∀z ∈ U.
′
≤
h (z)
|α| Reα
By applying the relation (23) we obtain that
67
1−|z|2Reγ
Reγ
(26)
′′
zh (z)
h′ (z) ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U.
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
So according to the Theorem 1 the function Fα,β is univalent.
Remark. Theorem 6 is a generalization of the Theorem 3.
Theorem 7. Let M ≥ 1, fi ∈S (p) , 0 < p < 2, fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 +
..., ∀i = 1, 2, so that
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
2 (pM + M + 1)
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
(27)
If |fi (z)| ≤ M, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
Fα,β (z) =
z
Z
β
tβ−1
0
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
f2 (t)
·
t
!1
α
1
β
dt
∈ S.
(28)
Proof. Considering the same steps as in the above proof we obtain:
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
!
2
z 2 f ′ (z)
zh′′ (z)
1 − |z|2Reα X
i
− 1 M + M + 1 .
′
≤
h (z)
|α| Reα i=1 fi2 (z)
(29)
But f ∈ S (p) , so
z 2 f ′ (z)
− 1 ≤ p |z|2 , ∀z ∈ U.
2
f (z)
(30)
In these conditions we obtain:
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
so,
2
zh′′ (z)
1 − |z|2Reα X
p |z|2 M + M + 1 , ∀z ∈ U,
′
≤
h (z)
|α| Reα i=1
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
zh′′ (z)
2 (pM + M + 1)
′
≤
.
h (z)
|α| Reα
By applying in (32) the relation (27) we obtain that
1, ∀z ∈ U.
68
(31)
(32)
1−|z|2Reγ
Reγ
′′
zh (z)
h′ (z) ≤
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
So according to the Theorem 1 the function Fα,β is univalent.
Remark. Theorem 7 is a generalization of the Theorem 4.
References
[1] Breaz, D.,Breaz, N., The univalent conditions for an integral operator
on the classes S (p) and T2 , Preprint,2004.
[2] Pascu, N.N., An improvement of Becker’s univalence criterion, Proceedings of the Commemorative Session Simion Stoilow, Brasov, (1987), 43-48.
[3] Singh, V., On class of univalent functions, Internat. J. Math &Math.
Sci. 23(2000), 12, 855-857. [4] Yang, D., Liu, J., On a class of univalent
functions, Internat. J. Math &Math. Sci. 22(1999), 3, 605-610.
D. Breaz:
Department of Mathematics
”‘1 Decembrie 1918”’ University of Alba Iulia
Alba Iulia, str. N. Iorga, No. 11-13, 510009, Romania
E-mail address: dbreaz@uab.ro
N. Breaz:
Department of Mathematics
”‘1 Decembrie 1918”’ University of Alba Iulia
Alba Iulia, str. N. Iorga, No. 11-13, 510009, Romania
E-mail address: nbreaz@uab.ro
69
No 9/2005
THE UNIVALENT CONDITION FOR AN INTEGRAL
OPERATOR
ON THE CLASSES S (α) AND T2
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz
Abstract.In this paper we present a few conditions of univalency for the
operator Fα,β on the classes of the univalent functions S (p) and T2 . These are
actually generalizations(extensions) of certain results published in the paper
[1].
AMS 2000 Subject Classification: 30C45.
Keywords and phrases: Unit disk, analytical function, univalent function,integral operator.
1.Introduction
Let be the class of analytical functions, A = {f : f = z + a2 z 2 + ...} , z ∈ U ,
where U is the unit disk , U = {z : |z| < 1} and denote S the class of univalent
functions in the unit disk.
Let p the real number with the property 0 < p ≤ 2. We define the class
S (p) as the class
of the functions f ∈ A, that satisfy the conditions f (z) 6= 0
′′
and (z/f (z)) ≤ p, z ∈ U and if f ∈ S (p) then the following property is true
2 ′
z f (z)
2
f 2 (z) − 1 ≤ p |z| , z ∈ U, relation proved in [3].
We denote
2 ′ with T2 the class of the univalent functions that satisfy the
(z)
condition zf 2f(z)
− 1 < 1, z ∈ U , and also have the property f ′′ (0) = 0.
These functions have the form f = z + a3 z 3 + a4 z 4 + .... For 0 < µ < 1 we have
a subclass of functions
by Tµ,2 , containing the functions f ∈ T2 that
2 denoted
z f ′ (z)
satisfy the property f 2 (z) − 1 < µ < 1, z ∈ U .
Next we present a few well known results related to these classes, results
on which shall rely in this paper.
63
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
The Schwartz Lemma. Let the analytic function g be regular in the unit
disc U and g (0) = 0. If |g (z)| ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U, then
|g (z)| ≤ |z| , ∀z ∈ U
(1)
and equality holds only if g (z) = εz, where |ε| = 1.
Theorem 1.[2]. Let α ∈ C, Reα > 0 and f ∈ A. If
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
zf ′′ (z)
′
≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U
f (z)
(2)
then ∀β ∈, Reβ ≥ Reα, the function
Fβ (z) = β
Zz
0
1/β
tβ−1 f ′ (t) dt
(3)
is univalent.
Theorem 2.[1]. Let fi ∈T2 , fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 + ..., ∀i = 1, 2, so that
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
6
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
(4)
If |fi (z)| ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
z
Z
Fα,β (z) = β
tβ−1
0
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
·
f2 (t)
t
!1
1
β
α
dt ∈ S.
(5)
Theorem 3.[1]. Let fi ∈T2,µ , fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 + ..., ∀i = 1, 2, so that
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
2 (µ + 2)
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
(6)
If |fi (z)| ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
z
Z
Fα,β (z) = β
0
tβ−1
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
·
f2 (t)
t
!1
α
1
β
dt ∈ S.
(7)
Theorem 4.[1]. Let fi ∈S (p) , 0 < p < 2, fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 + ..., ∀i =
1, 2, so that
64
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
2 (p + 2)
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
(8)
If |fi (z)| ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
z
Z
Fα,β (z) = β
tβ−1
0
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
·
f2 (t)
t
!1
1
β
α
2.Main results
dt ∈ S.
(9)
Theorem 5. Let M ≥ 1,fi ∈T2 , fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 + ..., ∀i = 1, 2, so
that
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
(4M + 2)
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
(10)
If |fi (z)| ≤ M, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
Fα,β (z) =
Proof.
z
Z
β
tβ−1
0
f1 (t)
t
We consider the function h (z) =
!1
α
f2 (t)
·
t
Rz f1 (t) α1
t
0
·
!1
1
β
α
f2 (t)
t
dt
1
α
∈ S.
(11)
dt.
We observe that h (0) = h′ (0) − 1 = 0.
By calculating the derivatives of the order I and II for this function we
obtain:
′
h (z) =
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
f2 (t)
·
t
!1
α
(12)
respectively
h′′ (z) =
1
1 ′
h (z) · B1 + h′ (z) · B2
α
α
where
65
(13)
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
Bk =
z
zfk′ (z) − fk (z)
·
, k = 1, 2.
fk (z)
z2
!
We calculate the fraction
′′
zh (z)
=
h′ (z)
zh′′ (z)
h′ (z)
z · α1 h′ (z) ·
(14)
and we obtain:
2
P
k=1
h′ (z)
Bk
2
1 X
Bk , ∀z ∈ U.
=z· ·
α k=1
(15)
Replacing Bk , k = 1, 2, in formula (15) we obtain:
1
zh′′ (z)
=
′
h (z)
α
zf1′ (z)
1
−1 +
f1 (z)
α
!
zf2′ (z)
−1 .
f2 (z)
!
(16)
We evaluate the modulus and we multiply in both terms of the relation
2Reα
(16) with 1−|z|
, obtain:
Reα
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
!
2
zh′′ (z)
z 2 f ′ (z) |f (z)|
1 − |z|2Reα X
i
i
′
≤
+1 .
h (z)
|α| Reα i=1 fi2 (z) |z|
(17)
Because |fi (z)| ≤ M, ∀z ∈ U , ∀i = 1, 2 and applying Schwarz Lemma we
obtain that
|fi (z)|
≤ M, ∀z ∈ U, ∀i = 1, 2.
|z|
(18)
We apply this relation in the above inequality and we obtain:
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
But
!
2
z 2 f ′ (z)
zh′′ (z)
1 − |z|2Reα X
i
′
≤
M + 1 .
h (z)
|α| Reα i=1 fi2 (z)
z 2 f ′ (z)
z 2 f ′ (z)
z 2 f ′ (z)
i
i
i
= 2
2
− 1 + 1 ≤ 2
− 1 + 1, ∀z ∈ U, ∀i = 1, 2.
fi (z)
fi (z)
fi (z)
2 ′
(z)
Because f ∈ T2 , so zf 2f(z)
− 1 < 1.
Applying this property and (20) in (19), obtain that:
66
(19)
(20)
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
2Reα
1 − |z|
Reα
2Reα
zh′′ (z)
(4M + 2)
1
−
|z|
(4M + 2)
′
≤
≤
, ∀z ∈ U.
h (z)
|α| Reα
|α| Reα
Because Reα >
(4M +2)
,
|α|
(21)
we obtain that
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
zh′′ (z)
′
≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U.
h (z)
(22)
Applying Theorem 1 we obtain that Fα,β ∈ S.
Remark. Theorem 5 is a generalization of the Theorem 2.
Theorem 6. Let M ≥ 1, fi ∈T2,µ , fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 + ..., ∀i = 1, 2,
so that
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
2 (µM + M + 1)
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
(23)
If |fi (z)| ≤ M, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
z
Z
Fα,β (z) = β
0
tβ−1
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
·
f2 (t)
t
!1
α
1
β
dt ∈ S.
(24)
Proof. Considering the same steps as in the above proof we obtain:
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
!
2
zh′′ (z)
z 2 f ′ (z)
1 − |z|2Reα X
i
− 1 M + M + 1 .
′
≤
h (z)
|α| Reα i=1 fi2 (z)
(25)
2 ′ (z)
− 1 < µ, ∀z ∈ U.
But f ∈ T2,µ , which implies that zf 2f(z)
In these conditions we obtain:
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
zh′′ (z)
2 (µM + M + 1)
, ∀z ∈ U.
′
≤
h (z)
|α| Reα
By applying the relation (23) we obtain that
67
1−|z|2Reγ
Reγ
(26)
′′
zh (z)
h′ (z) ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U.
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
So according to the Theorem 1 the function Fα,β is univalent.
Remark. Theorem 6 is a generalization of the Theorem 3.
Theorem 7. Let M ≥ 1, fi ∈S (p) , 0 < p < 2, fi (z) = z + ai3 z 3 + ai4 z 4 +
..., ∀i = 1, 2, so that
α, β ∈ C, Reα ≥
2 (pM + M + 1)
, Reβ ≥ Reα.
|α|
(27)
If |fi (z)| ≤ M, ∀z ∈ U, i = 1, 2 then ∀β ∈ C the function
Fα,β (z) =
z
Z
β
tβ−1
0
f1 (t)
t
!1
α
f2 (t)
·
t
!1
α
1
β
dt
∈ S.
(28)
Proof. Considering the same steps as in the above proof we obtain:
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
!
2
z 2 f ′ (z)
zh′′ (z)
1 − |z|2Reα X
i
− 1 M + M + 1 .
′
≤
h (z)
|α| Reα i=1 fi2 (z)
(29)
But f ∈ S (p) , so
z 2 f ′ (z)
− 1 ≤ p |z|2 , ∀z ∈ U.
2
f (z)
(30)
In these conditions we obtain:
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
so,
2
zh′′ (z)
1 − |z|2Reα X
p |z|2 M + M + 1 , ∀z ∈ U,
′
≤
h (z)
|α| Reα i=1
1 − |z|2Reα
Reα
zh′′ (z)
2 (pM + M + 1)
′
≤
.
h (z)
|α| Reα
By applying in (32) the relation (27) we obtain that
1, ∀z ∈ U.
68
(31)
(32)
1−|z|2Reγ
Reγ
′′
zh (z)
h′ (z) ≤
Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz - The univalent condition for an integral ...
So according to the Theorem 1 the function Fα,β is univalent.
Remark. Theorem 7 is a generalization of the Theorem 4.
References
[1] Breaz, D.,Breaz, N., The univalent conditions for an integral operator
on the classes S (p) and T2 , Preprint,2004.
[2] Pascu, N.N., An improvement of Becker’s univalence criterion, Proceedings of the Commemorative Session Simion Stoilow, Brasov, (1987), 43-48.
[3] Singh, V., On class of univalent functions, Internat. J. Math &Math.
Sci. 23(2000), 12, 855-857. [4] Yang, D., Liu, J., On a class of univalent
functions, Internat. J. Math &Math. Sci. 22(1999), 3, 605-610.
D. Breaz:
Department of Mathematics
”‘1 Decembrie 1918”’ University of Alba Iulia
Alba Iulia, str. N. Iorga, No. 11-13, 510009, Romania
E-mail address: dbreaz@uab.ro
N. Breaz:
Department of Mathematics
”‘1 Decembrie 1918”’ University of Alba Iulia
Alba Iulia, str. N. Iorga, No. 11-13, 510009, Romania
E-mail address: nbreaz@uab.ro
69