Paper-14-Acta24.2010. 258KB Jun 04 2011 12:03:10 AM

Acta Universitatis Apulensis
ISSN: 1582-5329

No. 24/2010
pp. 161-172

THE GEODESIC CURVATURE AND GEODESIC TORSION OF
THE INTERSECTION CURVE OF TWO SURFACES

Bahar Uyar Düldül AND Mustafa Çalışkan
Abstract. In this paper, we study the geodesic torsion and the geodesic curvature of intersection curve of two regular surfaces given by parametric-parametric
and implicit-implicit equations. We express the curvature vector and the curvature
by means of the geodesic curvatures of the intersection curve and the normal vectors
of the surfaces.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 53A05, 53A04.
1. Introduction
It is well known that the curvatures of a space curve given by its parametric
equation can be found easily [3, 8, 9]. But, if the space curve is given as an intersection of two surfaces in Euclidean 3-space, the curvature computations become
harder. For that reason, a lot of methods were given for computing the curvatures of
the intersection curve and also the curvatures (normal, mean, Gaussian) of the intersecting surfaces. Some of these methods include algorithms to compute curvatures
and some consist curvature formulas [4, 5, 7].

Surfaces are generally given by their parametric or implicit equations. Because of this, surface-surface intersection problem appears commonly as parametricparametric, parametric-implicit and implicit-implicit in which the intersection is
transversal or tangential. If the normal vectors of two surfaces are not parallel at
the intersecting points, the intersection is called transversal intersection. Under such
an intersection, the tangent vector of the intersection curve can be computed easily
by vector product of two normals.
Aléssio and Guadalupe present formulas on geodesic torsion and geodesic curvature for the intersection curve of two spacelike surfaces in Lorentz-Minkowski 3-space
[2]. Hartmann, [5], provides formulas for computing the curvature and torsion of the
intersection curve. Goldman derives curvature formulas for implicit curves and surfaces using the classical curvature formulas in Differential Geometry for parametric
curves and surfaces [4].
161

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...

Willmore gives the method for computing the Frenet apparatus of the transversal
intersection curve of two implicit surfaces, [9].
Ye and Maekawa derive the Frenet vectors and curvatures of the intersection
curve for all three types of transversal and tangential intersections. They obtain
also the normal curvatures -in the direction of the tangent vector- of the surfaces at
the intersecting points. Finally, they give algorithms for the evaluation of higherorder derivatives, [10].
Using the Implicit Function Theorem, Aléssio gives a method to compute the

unit tangent, the unit principal normal and the unit binormal vectors, also the
curvature and the torsion of the intersection curve of two implicit surfaces, [1].
In this study; first, after giving the method for computing the geodesic torsion
and geodesic curvature of the intersection curve of two parametric surfaces, the
curvature vector and the curvature of the intersection curve are expressed with the
geodesic curvatures of the curve and the normal vectors of the surfaces. Later, we
calculate the geodesic torsion and geodesic curvature of the intersection curve of two
regular surfaces given implicitly.
2. Preliminaries
Let α = α(s) be a unit-speed curve on a regular surface in R3 . Then, t = α′ (s)
is called the unit tangent vector at the point α(s). The vector t′ = α′′ (s) measures
the way the curve is turning and is called the curvature vector. The length of the
curvature vector denotes the curvature κ(s) of the curve α, i.e. κ(s) = ||t′ ||.
Let us consider the Darboux frame {t, V, N} instead of the Frenet frame on the
curve α, where N is the surface normal restricted to α and V = N × t. Then, we
have
 ′
κg V + κ n N
 t =
V′ = −κg t

+ τg N ,
(2.1)
 ′
N = −κn t − τg V

where κn is the normal curvature of the surface in the direction of the tangent
vector t; τg and κg are the geodesic torsion and geodesic curvature of the curve α,
respectively, [6]. Thus, the geodesic torsion and geodesic curvature of α are given
by, from (2.1),
τg = hV′ , Ni, κg = ht′ , Vi,
(2.2)
where h, i denotes the scalar product.
3.Parametric-parametric surface intersection
3.1. Geodesic Torsion
In this section, we give the geodesic torsion of the transversal intersection curve
of two surfaces.
162

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...


Let A and B be two regular intersecting surfaces with the parametrizations
X(u, v) and Y(p, q), respectively, i.e.
Xu × Xv 6= 0, Yp × Yq 6= 0.
Then, the unit normal vectors of the surfaces A and B are given by
NA =

Yp × Yq
Xu × Xv
, NB =
.
||Xu × Xv ||
||Yp × Yq ||

Since the normal vectors NA and NB are not parallel at the intersecting points, then
the unit tangent vector of the intersection curve at a point P = X(u, v) = Y(p, q)
is given by
NA × NB
.
(3.1)
t=

||NA × NB ||

Let us denote the intersection curve of the surfaces A and B with α(s), where
s is the arc length parameter and denote the Darboux frames of α by {t, VA , NA }
and {t, VB , NB } on the surfaces A and B, respectively. Thus, from (2.2), we have
′
′
τgA = h VA , NA i, τgB = h VB , NB i.

Since α is the intersection curve, we may also write

α(s) = X(u(s), v(s)) = Y(p(s), q(s))
which yield
α′ (s) = t = Xu u′ + Xv v ′ = Yp p′ + Yq q ′ .

(3.2)

Then, the geodesic torsion of the intersection curve α with respect to the surface A
is
n

2
2 o
1
τgA = √
(EM − F L) u′ + (EN − GL) u′ v ′ + (F N − GM ) v ′
EG − F 2
(3.3)
in which u′ , v ′ can be obtained by (as given by [10])


u′ =
v′ =

1
EG−F 2
1
EG−F 2

(Ght, Xu i − F ht, Xv i)
,

(Eht, Xv i − F ht, Xu i)

(3.4)

where E, F, G and L, M, N are, respectively, the first and second fundamental form
coefficients of the surface A (The formula (3.3) can be found in classic books on
differential geometry).
163

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...

Similarly, the geodesic torsion of the intersection curve α with respect to the
surface B is found from
n
2
2 o
1
(em − f ℓ) p′ + (en − gℓ) p′ q ′ + (f n − gm) q ′
,
(3.5)

τgB = p
eg − f 2

where e, f, g and ℓ, m, n denote, respectively, the first and second fundamental form
coefficients of the surface B; and p′ , q ′ can be computed from
(
1
p′ = eg−f
2 (ght, Yp i − f ht, Yq i)
.
(3.6)
1

q = eg−f 2 (eht, Yq i − f ht, Yp i)
3.2. Geodesic Curvature
In this section, we are going to evaluate the geodesic curvatures of the intersection
curve α according to the surfaces A and B.
The second derivative of the intersection curve α is obtained by (3.2) as
 ′
t = Xuu (u′ )2 + 2Xuv u′ v ′ + Xvv (v ′ )2 + Xu u′′ + Xv v ′′

.
(3.7)
= Ypp (p′ )2 + 2Ypq p′ q ′ + Yqq (q ′ )2 + Yp p′′ + Yq q ′′
Thus, from (2.2), the geodesic curvature of the intersection curve α with respect to
A is
n


√ 1
κA
=
Fu − E2v hXu , ti − E2u hXv , ti (u′ )2
g
EG−F 2
+ (Gu hXu , ti − Ev hXv , ti) u′ v ′
o



+ G2v hXu , ti − Fv − G2u hXv , ti (v ′ )2


(3.8)


+ EG − F 2 (u′ v ′′ − v ′ u′′ )

(The formula (3.8) can be found in classic books on differential geometry). Since
u′ , v ′ are known by (3.4), we need to evaluate u′′ , v ′′ to find the geodesic curvature
of the intersection curve.
From (3.7), we have
Xu u′′ + Xv v ′′ = Yp p′′ + Yq q ′′ + Λ,

(3.9)

where
Λ = Ypp p′

2

+ 2Ypq p′ q ′ + Yqq q ′


2

− Xuu u′

2

− 2Xuv u′ v ′ − Xvv v ′

2

.

If we take the vector product of both hand sides of (3.9) by Yq and Yp , we obtain
(Xu × Yq )u′′ + (Xv × Yq )v ′′ = (Yp × Yq )p′′ + Λ × Yq

(Xu × Yp )u′′ + (Xv × Yp )v ′′ = (Yq × Yp )q ′′ + Λ × Yp
164

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...

which yield

p′′ = a11 u′′ + a12 v ′′ + a13
,
q ′′ = a21 u′′ + a22 v ′′ + a23

(3.10)

where
a11 =
a21 =

det(Xu ,Yq ,NB )



eg−f 2

det(Yp ,Xu ,NB )



eg−f 2

, a12 =
, a22 =

det(Xv ,Yq ,NB )



eg−f 2

det(Yp ,Xv ,NB )



eg−f 2

, a13 =
, a23 =

det(Yq ,Λ,NB )



eg−f 2

det(Λ,Yp ,NB )



eg−f 2

,
.

Taking the scalar product of both hand sides of (3.9) with NB yields
hXu , NB iu′′ + hXv , NB iv ′′ = hΛ, NB i

(3.11)

and taking the scalar product of both hand sides of (3.7) with t gives
hXu , tiu′′ + hXv , tiv ′′ = −hXuu , ti u′

2

− 2hXuv , tiu′ v ′ − hXvv , ti v ′

2

.

(3.12)

(3.11) and (3.12) constitute a linear system with respect to u′′ and v ′′ which has
nonvanishing coefficients determinant, i.e. ∆ = ||Xu × Xv ||.||NA × NB || =
6 0. Thus,
u′′ and v ′′ can be computed by solving this linear system.
Similarly, the geodesic curvature of the intersection curve with respect to the
surface B is given by
n

e
e 
1

fp − 2q hYp , ti − 2p hYq , ti (p′ )2
κB
=
g
2
eg−f

+ (gp hYp , ti − eq hYq , ti) p′ q ′
o
g

g 
+ 2q hYp , ti − fq − 2p hYq , ti (q ′ )2

(3.13)

p
+ eg − f 2 (p′ q ′′ − q ′ p′′ ),

where p′′ and q ′′ can be found from (3.10).
3.3. Curvature vector and Curvature
In this section, we express the curvature vector (hence the curvature) of the
intersection curve with geodesic curvatures.
Since the curvature vector t′ of the intersection curve is perpendicular to the
tangent vector t, it can be represented as a linear combination of the normal vectors
NA and NB , i.e.
t′ = λNA + µNB .
(3.14)

165

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...

Now, let us find the unknowns λ and µ. By taking the scalar product of both
hand sides of (3.14) with VA and VB , we get
λ=

1 B
κ ,
sin θ g

µ=−

1 A
κ ,
sin θ g

(3.15)

where θ is the angle between the normal vectors of the surfaces.
If we substitute (3.15) into (3.14), we obtain the curvature vector of the intersection curve as

1
A
A B
.
(3.16)
t′ =
κB
g N − κg N
sin θ
Hence, we may give:
Theorem 1. Let α be a unit speed intersection curve of two regular surfaces
A and B. Then, the relation between the curvature and geodesic curvatures of the
intersection curve is
q
2
2
1
B
κ=
κA
+ κB
− 2κA
g
g
g κg cos θ,
| sin θ|
where θ is the angle between the normal vectors.

4. Implicit-implicit surface intersection
In this part, we give the geodesic torsion and geodesic curvature of the intersection curve of the regular surfaces A and B which are given by their implicit functions
f (x, y, z) = 0 and g(x, y, z) = 0, respectively.
Since ∇f = (fx , fy , fz ) 6= 0 and ∇g = (gx , gy , gz ) 6= 0, the normal vectors are
given by
∇g
∇f
, NB =
.
NA =
||∇f ||
||∇g||

The tangent vector of the intersection curve is then given by
t=

∇f × ∇g
.
||∇f × ∇g||

(4.1)

4.1. Geodesic Torsion
Let us denote the intersection curve with α(s) = (x(s), y(s), z(s)), where s is the
arc-length parameter.

Using τgA = h VA , NA i and VA = NA × t, we get
τgA =

1

||∇f ||2 .||∇f

× ∇g||

h||∇f ||2 ∇g − h∇f, ∇gi∇f, (∇f )′ i.
166

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...

Since

(∇f )′ = fxx x′ + fxy y ′ + fxz z ′ , fxy x′ + fyy y ′ + fyz z ′ , fxz x′ + fyz y ′ + fzz z ′ ,

we also have
τgA =

1
||∇f ×∇g||

{gx (fxx x′ + fxy y ′ + fxz z ′ ) + gy (fxy x′ + fyy y ′ + fyz z ′ )

+gz (fxz x′ + fyz y ′ + fzz z ′ )} −

cot θ
||∇f ||2

{fx (fxx x′ + fxy y ′ + fxz z ′ )

+fy (fxy x′ + fyy y ′ + fyz z ′ ) + fz (fxz x′ + fyz y ′ + fzz z ′ )} ,
where θ is the angle between the normal vectors. Thus, we have the following
theorem:
Theorem 2. Let A and B be two intersecting surfaces given by the implicit functions f = 0, g = 0. Then, the geodesic torsion of the intersection curve according to
A and B is given, respectively, by


1
cot θ
A
τg =
∇G −
∇F ΦT
||∇f × ∇g||
||∇f ||2
and
τgB =
where




−1
cot θ
∇F +
∇G
ΨT,
||∇f × ∇g||
||∇g||2

∇F = [fx fy fz ],

∇G = [gx gy gz ],


fxx fxy fxz
Φ =  fxy fyy fyz  ,
fxz fyz fzz





x′
T =  y′  ,
z′



gxx gxy gxz
Ψ =  gxy gyy gyz  .
gxz gyz gzz

4.2. Geodesic curvature
Since α′ (s) = t = (x′ , y ′ , z ′ ) and α′′ (s) = t′ = (x′′ , y ′′ , z ′′ ), the geodesic curvature
of the intersection curve at the point α(s0 ) = P with respect to the surface A is, [7],
κA
g =


1  ′ ′′
(y z − y ′′ z ′ )fx + (z ′ x′′ − z ′′ x′ )fy + (x′ y ′′ − x′′ y ′ )fz .
||∇f ||
167

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...
x′ , y ′ , z ′ are known by (4.1). Thus, we must find x′′ , y ′′ , z ′′ to evaluate the geodesic
curvature.
Using ht′ , ti = 0 gives us the first linear equation with respect to x′′ , y ′′ , z ′′ as
x′ x′′ + y ′ y ′′ + z ′ z ′′ = 0.

(4.2)

On the other hand; since ht, ∇f i = 0 and ht, ∇gi = 0, we have
ht′ , ∇f i = −ht, (∇f )′ i, ht′ , ∇gi = −ht, (∇g)′ i
which yield the other two linear equations:
2
− fzz z ′

−2 fxy x′ y ′ + fxz x′ z ′ + fyz y ′ z ′

fx x′′ + fy y ′′ + fz z ′′ = −fxx x′

2

− fyy y ′

2

− gyy y ′

2

(4.3)

2

(4.4)

2
− gzz z ′

−2 gxy x′ y ′ + gxz x′ z ′ + gyz y ′ z ′ .

gx x′′ + gy y ′′ + gz z ′′ = −gxx x′

(4.2), (4.3) and (4.4) constitute a linear system with respect to x′′ , y ′′ , z ′′ with
nonzero coefficients determinant (∆ = ||∇f × ∇g|| =
6 0). Hence, solving this system
completes the geodesic curvature of the intersection curve.
Similarly,
κB
g =


1  ′ ′′
(y z − y ′′ z ′ )gx + (z ′ x′′ − z ′′ x′ )gy + (x′ y ′′ − x′′ y ′ )gz .
||∇g||

5. Examples
5.1. The intersection of parametric-parametric surfaces
Let the surface A be the sphere given by
X(u, v) = (cos u cos v, sin u cos v, sin v),

0 ≤ u ≤ π, 0 ≤ v ≤ 2π

and the surface B be the cylinder given by
1
1 1
Y(p, q) = ( cos p + , sin p, q),
2
2 2

− π ≤ p ≤ π,

− 1.5 ≤ q ≤ 1.5,

respectively (Figure 1).
Let us find the geodesic torsions, geodesic curvatures, curvature
 and curva √vector
√ 

2
π
π π
ture of the intersection curve at the point P = X 4 , 4 = Y 2 , 2 = 12 , 12 , 22 .
168

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...

Figure 1: The intersection of the sphere and the cylinder

derivatives of the surface A at P are Xu = − 12 , 21 , 0 ,Xv =
 The partial
√ 



− 21 , − 12 , 22 , Xuu = − 21 , − 12 , 0 , Xuv = 21 , − 12 , 0 , Xvv = − 12 , − 12 , − 22 .
Thus, we get the unit normal
and the first and second fundamental form coeffi
√ 
1 1
A
cients of A at P as N = 2 , 2 , 22 , E = −L = 12 , G = 1, Ev = N = −1, F =
Eu = Fu = Fv = Gu = Gv = M = 0.

Similarly, for the surface
B at the point P we have Yp = − 12 , 0, 0 , Yq =

(0, 0, 1) , Ypp = 0, − 12 , 0 , Ypq = Yqq = 0, NB = (0, 1, 0), e = 14 , g = 1, ℓ =
− 21 , f = ep = eq = fp = fq = gp = gq = m = n = 0.


Then, the tangent vector of the intersection curve at P is t =











6
3
3 , 0, 3

.

Using (3.4)
and (3.6), we find u′ = v ′ = 36 , p′ = 2 3 6 , q ′ = 33 at P . So, Λ =

√ 

0, 0, 32 , u′′ = v ′′ = 29 , p′′ = 49 , q ′′ = − 2 9 2 are obtained.
If we substitute these results into (3.3) and (3.5), we get the geodesic torsions as

2 2
A
B
;
τg = 0, τg =
3

169

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...

and into (3.8) and (3.13), the geodesic curvatures as


2 3
5 3
B
A
, κg = −
κg =
9
9
of the intersection curve at the point P .

√ 
Hence, from (3.16) the curvature vector at P is t′ = − 92 , − 34 , − 2 9 2 and then

the curvature at P is κ = 92 39.
Using the implicit functions of these surfaces and the method of Ye and Maekawa
[10], Aléssio had given the above curvature vector and curvature by means of the
normal curvatures of the intersection curve in the direction of t, [1].
5.2. The intersection of implicit-implicit surfaces
Let the surface A be the saddle surface given by f (x, y, z) = z − xy = 0 and the
surface B be the elliptic paraboloid given by g(x, y, z) = x2 + y 2 + z − 3 = 0 (Figure
2). The normal vectors of A and B at the intersection point P = (1, −2, −2) are
∇f = (2, −1, 1) and ∇g = (2, −4, 1), respectively. We also have at P
fxx = fxz = fyy = fyz = fzz = 0, fxy = −1
and
gxy = gxz = gyz = gzz = 0, gxx = gyy = 2.

Thus, we obtain ||∇f × ∇g|| = 3 5, ∇F = [2 − 1 1], ∇G = [2 − 4 1] and
 1 





2 0 0
0 −1 0
5


T =  0  , Φ =  −1 0 0  , Ψ =  0 2 0 
0 0 0
0
0 0
− √25

16
which yield τgA = 61 and τgB = − 105
.
To find the geodesic curvatures of the intersection curve, we must solve the linear
system obtained by (4.2), (4.3) and (4.4):

′′

x′′ − 2z ′′ =
′′

2x − y + z

′′

=

0
0

2
2x′′ − 4y ′′ + z ′′ = − .
5
The solution of this system is x′′ =

4
75 ,

y ′′ =

2
15 ,

z ′′ =

curvature of the intersection curve with respect to A is
B is

κB
g

=


2 105
175 .

170

2
75 . √Hence,
2 30
κA
g = 75 and

the geodesic
according to

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...

Figure 2: The intersection of the saddle surface and the elliptic paraboloid
The curvature vector of the intersection curve at P is t′ =
curvature is κ =



2 30
75 .

4 2 2
75 , 15 , 75



and the

References
[1] O. Aléssio, Geometria diferencial de curvas de interseção de duas superfı́cies
implı́citas, TEMA Tend. Mat. Apl. Comput. 7, 2, (2006), 169-178.
[2] O. Aléssio, I. V. Guadalupe, Determination of a transversal intersection curve
of two spacelike surfaces in Lorentz-Minkowski 3-space L3 , Hadronic Journal, 30,
3, (2007), 315-342.
[3] M. P. Carmo, Differential geometry of curves and surfaces, Prentice-Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1976.
[4] R. Goldman, Curvature formulas for implicit curves and surfaces, Computer
Aided Geometric Design 22, (2005), 632-658.
[5] E. Hartmann, G2 Interpolation and blending on surfaces, The Visual Computer, 12, (1996), 181-192.
[6] B. O’Neill, Elementary Differential Geometry, Academic Press, New York,
1966.
[7] N. M. Patrikalakis, T. Maekawa, Shape Interrogation for Computer Aided
Design and Manufacturing, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.
[8] D. J. Struik, Lectures on classical differential geometry, Addison Wesley,
Cambridge, MA, 1950.
[9] T. J. Willmore, An Introduction to Differential Geometry, Clarendon Press,
Oxford, 1959.
171

B. U. Düldül, M. Çalışkan - The geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion...

[10] X. Ye and T. Maekawa, Differential geometry of intersection curves of two
surfaces, Computer Aided Geometric Design 16, (1999), 767-788.
Bahar Uyar Düldül
Sinop Technical and Vocational High School, Sinop, Turkey
e-mail: [email protected]
Mustafa Çalışkan
Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Arts and Science
Department of Mathematics, 55139, Samsun, Turkey
e-mail: [email protected]

172

Dokumen yang terkait

AN ALIS IS YU RID IS PUT USAN BE B AS DAL AM P E RKAR A TIND AK P IDA NA P E NY E RTA AN M E L AK U K A N P R AK T IK K E DO K T E RA N YA NG M E N G A K IB ATK AN M ATINYA P AS IE N ( PUT USA N N O MOR: 9 0/PID.B /2011/ PN.MD O)

0 82 16

ANALISIS FAKTOR YANGMEMPENGARUHI FERTILITAS PASANGAN USIA SUBUR DI DESA SEMBORO KECAMATAN SEMBORO KABUPATEN JEMBER TAHUN 2011

2 53 20

EFEKTIVITAS PENDIDIKAN KESEHATAN TENTANG PERTOLONGAN PERTAMA PADA KECELAKAAN (P3K) TERHADAP SIKAP MASYARAKAT DALAM PENANGANAN KORBAN KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS (Studi Di Wilayah RT 05 RW 04 Kelurahan Sukun Kota Malang)

45 393 31

FAKTOR – FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PENYERAPAN TENAGA KERJA INDUSTRI PENGOLAHAN BESAR DAN MENENGAH PADA TINGKAT KABUPATEN / KOTA DI JAWA TIMUR TAHUN 2006 - 2011

1 35 26

A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON “SPA: REGAIN BALANCE OF YOUR INNER AND OUTER BEAUTY” IN THE JAKARTA POST ON 4 MARCH 2011

9 161 13

Pengaruh kualitas aktiva produktif dan non performing financing terhadap return on asset perbankan syariah (Studi Pada 3 Bank Umum Syariah Tahun 2011 – 2014)

6 101 0

Pengaruh pemahaman fiqh muamalat mahasiswa terhadap keputusan membeli produk fashion palsu (study pada mahasiswa angkatan 2011 & 2012 prodi muamalat fakultas syariah dan hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta)

0 22 0

Pendidikan Agama Islam Untuk Kelas 3 SD Kelas 3 Suyanto Suyoto 2011

4 108 178

ANALISIS NOTA KESEPAHAMAN ANTARA BANK INDONESIA, POLRI, DAN KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 2011 SEBAGAI MEKANISME PERCEPATAN PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PERBANKAN KHUSUSNYA BANK INDONESIA SEBAGAI PIHAK PELAPOR

1 17 40

KOORDINASI OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN (OJK) DENGAN LEMBAGA PENJAMIN SIMPANAN (LPS) DAN BANK INDONESIA (BI) DALAM UPAYA PENANGANAN BANK BERMASALAH BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG RI NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN

3 32 52