Urban Design Assignment 2
Assessment
2:
Urban
Design
-‐
15222
David
Hull
-‐
02043622
UAP
Elements
• What
are
the
distinct
elements
of
land
use
allocation
and
transport
provision
evident
in
the
UAP?
• How
are
higher
density
built
form
typologies
and
open
space
areas
integrated
within
the
UAP?
• What
would
be
the
benefits
of
these
strategies
for
the
UAP
and
its
surroundings?
The
vision
of
Wentworth
Point
is
to
contribute
to
the
growing
population
of
the
region,
through
high-‐density
sustainable
living
that
embraces
it’s
environmental
location
and
acts
as
an
extension
of
the
existing
surrounding
activated
precincts
(Wentworth
Point
Precinct
DCP
2014,
page
4.)
The
method
of
land
use
allocation
revolves
around
three
key
components;
stakeholders,
limitations
of
the
precinct
and
viable
options
(FAO
Corporate
Document
Repository,
1995).
The
elements
of
land
use
allocation
are
clearly
defined
in
the
UAP
and
can
be
broken
up
into
the
precinct
landscape
and
buildings,
public
spaces,
streets
and
transport
provisions.
The
objective
of
this
report
is
to
use
the
above
three
components
to
justify
whether
the
strategies
in
place
align
with
the
vision
for
the
future
of
Wentworth
Point,
or
whether
these
elements
of
land
allocation
can
be
improved
upon.
The
building
forms
comprise
of
high
density,
small,
medium
to
high-‐rise
housing,
strategically
allocated
to
manage
the
growing
population
of
the
region
and
increase
housing
choice,
which
is
a
fundamental
objective
of
the
DCP
(Wentworth
Point
Precinct
DCP
2014,
page
4.).
The
land
allocation
of
the
western
and
eastern
residential
precincts
is
strategically
divided
to
evenly
benefit
from
the
retail
and
community
buildings
located
in
the
village
centre.
The
land
allocation,
combined
with
the
variety
of
scale
of
the
building
form,
strategically
meets
the
DCP
objective
to
create
an
innovative
and
dynamic
urban
environment
of
high
quality
living,
whist
also
creating
distinct,
high-‐density
urban
communities.
The
plaza
with
retail
buildings
activate
the
waterfront
with
outdoor
dining
and
meet
the
DCP’s
strategy
to
enhance
the
natural
setting
along
Homebush
Bay
and
create
high
quality
places.
In
analysing
the
two
residential
precincts
based
on
stakeholders,
limitations
and
viable
options;
I
believe
the
western
residential
neighbourhood
is
disadvantaged
being
isolated
from
the
heavily
activated
peninsula
and
waterfront
plaza
on
the
eastern
foreshore.
Although
the
Parramatta
River
foreshore
path
serves
it’s
purpose
of
accessing
the
Sydney
Olympic
Park
Ferry
Wharf,
it
could
benefit
from
further
activation
such
as
outdoor
dining
and
retail
which
makes
the
Homebush
Bay
foreshore
path
so
well
designed.
Pocket
parks
are
distributed
through
the
two
defined
residential
precincts
as
well
as
open
spaced
corridors
providing
accessibility
to
the
waterfront.
The
pockets
of
park
areas
strategically
break
up
the
density
of
the
residential
region,
reducing
congestion
of
housing
and
aesthetically
improving
the
precinct.
The
relationship
between
the
buildings
and
corridors
successfully
encompasses
the
DCP
vision
to
embrace
its
position
along
the
Parramatta
River,
as
well
as
providing
access
to
the
Parramatta
River
and
Homebush
Bay
foreshore
and
ferry
wharf.
There
is
limited
open
space
within
the
higher
density
built
form
typology
of
the
eastern
neighbourhood,
however
this
can
justified
being
surrounded
by
the
Peninsula
Park
and
recreation
areas,
public
school
and
playing
fields.
Further
emphasis
on
trees
lining
the
streets
and
greenery
within
the
eastern
neighbourhood
could
help
improve
the
natural
environmental
aesthetics
that
the
pocket
parks
bring
to
its
western
neighbour.
Streets
and
transport
provisions
is
a
key
area
of
concern
raised
in
public
submissions
regarding
the
Wentworth
DCP,
with
particular
focus
on
parking,
traffic,
public
transport
and
pedestrian
and
cycle
access
which
are
all
a
bi-‐product
of
high
density
housing
(NSW
Department
of
Planning
&
Infrastructure,
page
6).
The
primary
objective
for
the
UAP
should
be
to
manage
public
transport
inefficiencies
for
stakeholders,
thereby
reducing
the
reliance
of
private
vehicles.
Besides
widening
roads
and
assuring
street
parking
is
on
all
local
streets
throughout
the
residential
precincts,
alleviating
traffic
and
parking
concerns
is
best
managed
through
the
public
transport
network.
Additional
ferry
services
and
extended
hours
of
operation
for
buses
will
achieve
this
objective,
as
well
as
improve
the
connectivity
with
the
neighbouring
precincts,
being
a
fundamental
objective
of
the
DCP.
Extending
already
existing
pedestrian
and
cycle
lanes
and
improving
bicycle
undercover
protection
and
security
around
the
public
transport
hubs,
will
improve
the
connectivity
and
accessibility
for
stakeholders
and
reduce
their
reliance
on
private
vehicles.
Assuring
the
activation
and
lighting
of
open
space
corridors
and
foreshore
paths
will
also
improve
connectivity
for
stakeholders
other
than
cars.
The
successful
integration
of
high
density
built
forms,
open
spaces
and
street
and
transport
provisions
contribute
to
the
vision
of
the
Wentworth
DCP.
An
increase
of
high-‐density
living
will
always
impact
on
the
natural
environment
of
the
surrounding
area
and
the
quality
of
living
for
the
residence.
“We
must
provide
facilities
for
recreation,
reset
and
relaxation
that
are
available
to
all
citizens
in
every
walk
of
life.
We
must
consider
the
urban
citizen
who
wants
his
recreation
within
the
city.
We
must,
in
particular,
consider
the
pressing
need
of
the
low-‐income
families
living
amid
the
congestion,
noise,
drabness,
and
unbroken
monotony
of
asphalt
and
brick
characteristic
of
the
deprived
areas
of
our
cities.
Here,
obviously,
we
have
the
greatest
deficit
of
green
space
and
recreational
facilities.”
Seymour
Jr.
W.
page
3.
Public
Realm
• What
are
the
specific
strategies
applied
to
creating
a
meaningful
public
realm?
• What
are
the
successful
and
less
successful
urban
design
elements
of
the
public
realm?
The
primary
focus
of
public
realms
should
be
on
how
people
interact
with
their
surrounding
environment;
ARC,
page
1.
The
public
realms
of
the
Wentworth
DCP
include
the
streets
and
pathways,
open
spaces,
parks
and
pocket
parks,
as
well
as
the
public
buildings
and
facilities.
Sustainable
design
strategies
to
improve
streetscapes
within
the
context
of
a
public
realm
focus
on
aesthetics,
connectivity,
health
and
social
functionality,
while
also
optimizing
local
economic
trade.
Streets
and
pathways
within
the
Wentworth
DCP
succeed
on
an
aesthetic
level
by
introducing
tree
lines
and
landscaped
gardens
wherever
possible
that
divide
the
high
level
built
form.
On
a
functional
level,
pathways
are
wide
to
promote
foot
traffic
and
include
street
furniture
(benches)
for
convenience.
The
majority
of
streets
include
cycle
paths
to
reduce
the
community’s
reliance
on
private
vehicles
whilst
optimizing
space
on
both
sides
of
the
street
for
parallel
parking.
Shop
frontages
and
awnings
are
easily
visible
and
accessible
to
promote
the
economic
landscape.
Safety
it
prioritized
with
site
access
for
emergency
vehicles,
wide
and
flat
pathways
and
both
street
and
pedestrian
lighting.
Within
the
high-‐density
residential
precincts,
parking
will
always
be
limited
and
the
DCP
public
realm
streetscape
has
not
done
enough
to
manage
demand.
Streets
are
not
equipped
to
handle
traffic
congestion
with
limited
road
access
points,
further
emphasized
on
weekends
and
during
public
events
at
Olympic
Park.
Besides
widening
streets,
the
best
means
to
reduce
the
pressure
of
the
existing
road
network
is
better
public
transport
connectivity,
extended
hours
of
operation
and
regularity.
The
open
spaces,
parks
and
pocket
parks
and
natural
corridors
are
a
well
thought
out
asset
of
the
Wentworth
DCP
public
realm.
“It
is
the
redevelopment
of
the
smaller
parks,
reserves
and
street
closures
that
makes
a
difference
to
the
local
community.”,
Jasprizza,
R,
page
292-‐294.
They
are
strategically
designed
in
a
manner
that
is
visually
appealing,
practical,
connected
and
sustainable,
while
responding
to
the
recreational
needs
of
the
community.
The
quality
landscape
design
and
positioning
of
the
pocket
parks
influence
the
character
and
image
of
the
public
realm,
whilst
creating
a
positive
impact
on
the
health,
wellbeing
and
social
interaction
of
the
residence.
The
parks
are
multi-‐functional
and
adaptable
to
the
needs
of
the
residence,
particularly
around
the
eastern
peninsula,
which
promotes
interaction
for
a
wider
demographic.
The
peninsula
park
and
wetlands
in
particular
promote
environmental
sustainability,
biodiversity
and
connection
with
the
natural
landscape,
which
was
an
objective
of
the
DCP.
The
less
successful
elements
of
public
realm
in
relation
to
the
parks
and
open
spaces
could
focus
on
the
wetlands
area,
whist
being
aesthetically
appealing,
it
may
not
meet
the
needs
of
the
recreational
demands
for
the
local
residence.
The
financial
sustainability
of
the
open
parks
and
recreational
areas
is
critical
and
may
need
to
be
addressed,
to
ensure
sustainable
ongoing
maintenance
costs
and
achieve
projected
life
cycles
(Public
Realm
–
Urban
Design
Guidelines,
Page
23)
Public
buildings
and
facilities
have
been
well
addressed,
with
particular
attention
around
the
Ferry
Wharf,
foreshore
walks
and
the
maritime
plaza.
The
foreshore
walks
are
strategically
activated
to
improve
accessibility
to
the
ferry
wharf
as
well
as
connection
between
the
two
residential
precincts.
The
Homebush
Bay
foreshore
and
maritime
plaza
strategically
activates
the
space
to
create
social
interaction,
exemplified
by
the
rowing
and
yacht
club
facilities.
The
connectivity
of
the
ferry
wharf
is
a
less
successful
element
of
the
public
realm,
with
no
bicycle
storage
facilities,
limited
parking
and
poorly
synchronized
connections
with
the
bus
transport.
The
DCP
also
does
not
address
public
buildings
such
as
a
library
or
community
halls.
Investing
in
quality
public
places
is
essential
for
a
well-‐balanced,
socially
inclusive
community
and
boosts
confidence
for
an
area.
A
high
standard
of
public
realms
stimulate
growth
in
the
visitor
economy,
increase
the
price
of
property
as
well
as
the
income
and
profit
for
local
businesses.
Health
and
Public
Safety
• What
types
of
design
solutions
have
been
suggested
to
improve
public
health
and
safety?
Design
solutions
of
the
DCP
revolve
around
outdoor
living
and
a
connection
with
the
natural
environment.
Green
infrastructure
and
the
connection
between
residential
built
forms
and
green
open
spaces
emphasize
health
and
safety
and
community
living
and
engagement.
The
Wentworth
DCP
uses
principles
recommended
in
Crime
Prevention
through
Environmental
Design
(CPTED)
to
mitigate
antisocial
behavior
(Wentworth
Point
Precinct
DCP
2014,
page
30).
Such
design
solutions
include;
• Casual
surveillance
in
all
public
realms,
• Adequate
lighting
on
streets
and
walkway
• Maximizing
visibility
into
building
entrances
and
ground
floor
dwelling
fronts.
• Where
possible,
buildings
are
designed
with
glass
panels
and
openings
so
lifts,
lobbies
and
openings
are
clearly
visible
from
public
domains.
Safety
has
been
heightened
with
improvements
made
to
the
connectivity
of
public
transport,
such
as
synchronizing
timetables
of
trains,
buses
and
ferries.
In
the
design
of
streets
and
built
forms,
safety
is
prioritized
with
site
access
for
emergency
vehicles
and
allocated
speed
zones
in
relevant
areas
(schools,
high
density
housing
areas,
etc)
As
mentioned
previously
and
in
relation
to
public
health,
wide
pathways
and
cycle
paths
are
evident
to
optimize
foot
traffic
and
activity,
reducing
the
reliance
of
private
vehicles
for
connectivity.
The
foreshore
is
activated
and
designed
to
promote
health
and
walkability.
Parks
and
open-‐spaces
are
multi-‐functional
with
recreational
spaces
to
promote
outdoor
living,
as
well
as
the
rowing
and
yacht
club
to
emphasize
sport
and
physical
activity.
Green
Infrastructure
• What
are
the
green
infrastructure
(landscaping,
trees,
vertical
gardens/green
roof
and
urban
food
production)
and
recommendations
for
creating
a
better
quality
of
urban
living?
The
vision
of
the
DCP
is
to
embrace
the
locality
and
natural
environment
has
been
achieved
by
limiting
the
impact
on
the
waterfront,
wetlands
and
already
existing
natural
settings.
Typologies
of
green
infrastructure
are
evident
throughout
the
DCP,
with
the
landscaping
of
tree-‐lined
streets,
the
abundance
of
open
spaces
and
activation
of
the
waterfront.
Where
practical
the
streets
are
lined
with
trees
and
green
gardens,
which
strategically
break
up
the
built
forms
in
high-‐density
areas.
Green
infrastructure
is
evident
in
the
pocket
parks
and
open
linear
spaces
(corridors),
creating
a
natural
connectivity
between
the
residential
built
forms
and
the
activated
waterfront.
The
landscaping
of
the
foreshore
includes
trees
and
natural
gardens
to
promote
an
emotional
connection
between
the
residence
and
the
natural
environment.
The
recreation
park
along
the
peninsula
adapts
to
the
wetlands,
the
objective
of
design
being
to
limit
the
impact
of
the
green
environment
whilst
creating
a
network
of
walkways
for
the
residence
to
connect
and
benefit
from
the
natural
setting.
Place
Making
• Have
other
techniques
(if
any,
except
above
questions)
been
incorporated
in
urban
design
strategies
for
the
UAP
to
enhance
place
making
for
communities?
Place
making
strategies
that
enhance
the
community
should
capitalize
on
the
assets
within
the
public
realm.
Its
inspiration
should
come
from
the
community
itself
and
contribute
to
the
public’s
health,
happiness
and
wellbeing
(Project
for
Public
Places,
p1).
Public
art
and
interactive
open
spaces
are
examples
of
place
making
strategies
that
create
community
involvement
and
wellbeing.
Public
art
is
located
in
key
focal
points
throughout
the
residential
precincts
and
open
spaces,
helping
to
generate
community
identity
and
maximizes
visibility
in
key
areas.
The
use
of
public
art
helps
define
areas
and
creates
a
sense
of
pride
for
the
community.
The
outdoor
landscape
creates
community
interaction
through
the
use
of
public
furniture
along
streets
and
walkways,
outdoors
dining
along
the
waterfront
and
recreational
areas.
Built
forms
along
the
waterfront
such
as
the
outdoor
dining,
plaza
and
rowing
and
yacht
club
provide
space
for
community
engagement
and
utilizes
the
foreshore
and
river
as
a
community
asset.
Key
Recommendations
and
conclusions:
Overall
the
objective
of
providing
sustainable
living
that
embraces
the
natural
surroundings
and
acts
as
an
extension
of
the
existing
surrounding
activated
precincts,
is
well
detailed
in
the
Wentworth
DCP.
There
are
areas
that
can
be
improved
to
provide
a
higher
quality
of
living
for
its
residence,
which
has
been
outlined
below;
• The
DCP
does
not
detail
adequate
facilities
for
community
use,
such
as
a
library
or
community
hall.
A
library/community
hall
would
benefit
place
making
and
community
engagement.
If
height
restrictions
permit,
a
library
above
the
plaza
or
a
community
hall
within
the
maritime
precinct
would
be
well
positioned
nearby
the
school
and
around
the
activated
waterfront
by
Homebush
Bay.
• The
DCP
fails
in
its
objective
of
being
an
extension
of
the
surrounding
activated
communities,
due
to
the
poor
public
transport
connectivity.
Connections
between
precincts
can
be
improved
with
synchronised
timetables
between
each
mode
of
public
transport
(train,
bus,
ferry),
as
well
as
improved
parking
and
cycle
storage
nearby
transport
nodes.
• The
western
residential
neighbourhood
is
isolated,
with
limited
connectivity
to
its
eastern
neighbour.
The
eastern
residential
precinct
benefits
from
much
more
activity
and
public
realms
(school,
wetlands,
peninsula,
waterfront,
etc).
The
waterfront
along
Parramatta
River
could
benefit
from
further
activation
such
as
outdoor
dining
and
retail
that
makes
the
Homebush
Bay
foreshore
path
so
affective.
• Currently
the
only
sporting
ground
that
exist
in
the
UAP
belong
to
the
school.
The
precinct
would
benefit
from
a
shared
school/community
use
of
the
school
playing
field
outside
of
school
hours.
• There
are
no
landmarks
within
the
UAP.
Excluding
public
art,
an
easily
identifiable
physical
object
in
the
urban
landscape
would
help
community
pride
as
well
as
act
as
a
point
of
reference
for
key
areas
of
the
precinct.
References:
1. FAO
Corporate
Document
Repository,
(1995).
Planning
for
sustainable
use
of
land
resources;
Towards
a
new
approach.
Available
at
http://www.fao.org/docrep/v8047e/v8047e05.htm.
(accessed
30.05.16)
2. NSW
Department
of
Planning
&
Infrastructure
(2014).
Wentworth
Point
Urban
Activation
Precinct
Finalisation
Report,
page
6.
Available
at
http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/~/media/Files/DPE/Reports/we
ntworth-‐point-‐urban-‐activation-‐precinct-‐finalisation-‐report-‐
2014.ashx
(accessed
23.05.16)
3. ARC.
What
is
a
Public
Realm,
page
1.
Available
at
http://www.arc-‐
online.co.uk/public-‐realm/what-‐is-‐public-‐realm,
(accessed
20.05.16)
4. Local
Government
Association
of
South
Australia,
Public
Realm
–
Urban
Design
Guidelines,
Page
23,
Available
at
https://www.lga.sa.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/Public%20Re
alm%20Urban%20Design%20Guidelines.pdf
(Accessed
23.05.16)
5. Projects
for
Public
Spaces,
What
is
Place
Making,
p1.
Available
at
http://www.pps.org/reference/what_is_placemaking/
(accessed
28.05.16)
6. Jasprizza,
Roger.
“Small
Spaces
Make
a
Difference”
Landscape
Australia
1999
Nov.-‐2000
Jan.,
v.21,
n.4
(84),
p.292-‐294
7. Robert
C.
Weaver,
Seymour
Jr.
W.
“Recreational
Needs
in
Urban
Areas”
(From
Whitney
North
Seymour
Jr.
An
Introduction
to
Small
Urban
Spaces,
p3.
2:
Urban
Design
-‐
15222
David
Hull
-‐
02043622
UAP
Elements
• What
are
the
distinct
elements
of
land
use
allocation
and
transport
provision
evident
in
the
UAP?
• How
are
higher
density
built
form
typologies
and
open
space
areas
integrated
within
the
UAP?
• What
would
be
the
benefits
of
these
strategies
for
the
UAP
and
its
surroundings?
The
vision
of
Wentworth
Point
is
to
contribute
to
the
growing
population
of
the
region,
through
high-‐density
sustainable
living
that
embraces
it’s
environmental
location
and
acts
as
an
extension
of
the
existing
surrounding
activated
precincts
(Wentworth
Point
Precinct
DCP
2014,
page
4.)
The
method
of
land
use
allocation
revolves
around
three
key
components;
stakeholders,
limitations
of
the
precinct
and
viable
options
(FAO
Corporate
Document
Repository,
1995).
The
elements
of
land
use
allocation
are
clearly
defined
in
the
UAP
and
can
be
broken
up
into
the
precinct
landscape
and
buildings,
public
spaces,
streets
and
transport
provisions.
The
objective
of
this
report
is
to
use
the
above
three
components
to
justify
whether
the
strategies
in
place
align
with
the
vision
for
the
future
of
Wentworth
Point,
or
whether
these
elements
of
land
allocation
can
be
improved
upon.
The
building
forms
comprise
of
high
density,
small,
medium
to
high-‐rise
housing,
strategically
allocated
to
manage
the
growing
population
of
the
region
and
increase
housing
choice,
which
is
a
fundamental
objective
of
the
DCP
(Wentworth
Point
Precinct
DCP
2014,
page
4.).
The
land
allocation
of
the
western
and
eastern
residential
precincts
is
strategically
divided
to
evenly
benefit
from
the
retail
and
community
buildings
located
in
the
village
centre.
The
land
allocation,
combined
with
the
variety
of
scale
of
the
building
form,
strategically
meets
the
DCP
objective
to
create
an
innovative
and
dynamic
urban
environment
of
high
quality
living,
whist
also
creating
distinct,
high-‐density
urban
communities.
The
plaza
with
retail
buildings
activate
the
waterfront
with
outdoor
dining
and
meet
the
DCP’s
strategy
to
enhance
the
natural
setting
along
Homebush
Bay
and
create
high
quality
places.
In
analysing
the
two
residential
precincts
based
on
stakeholders,
limitations
and
viable
options;
I
believe
the
western
residential
neighbourhood
is
disadvantaged
being
isolated
from
the
heavily
activated
peninsula
and
waterfront
plaza
on
the
eastern
foreshore.
Although
the
Parramatta
River
foreshore
path
serves
it’s
purpose
of
accessing
the
Sydney
Olympic
Park
Ferry
Wharf,
it
could
benefit
from
further
activation
such
as
outdoor
dining
and
retail
which
makes
the
Homebush
Bay
foreshore
path
so
well
designed.
parks
are
distributed
through
the
two
defined
residential
precincts
as
well
as
open
spaced
corridors
providing
accessibility
to
the
waterfront.
The
pockets
of
park
areas
strategically
break
up
the
density
of
the
residential
region,
reducing
congestion
of
housing
and
aesthetically
improving
the
precinct.
The
relationship
between
the
buildings
and
corridors
successfully
encompasses
the
DCP
vision
to
embrace
its
position
along
the
Parramatta
River,
as
well
as
providing
access
to
the
Parramatta
River
and
Homebush
Bay
foreshore
and
ferry
wharf.
There
is
limited
open
space
within
the
higher
density
built
form
typology
of
the
eastern
neighbourhood,
however
this
can
justified
being
surrounded
by
the
Peninsula
Park
and
recreation
areas,
public
school
and
playing
fields.
Further
emphasis
on
trees
lining
the
streets
and
greenery
within
the
eastern
neighbourhood
could
help
improve
the
natural
environmental
aesthetics
that
the
parks
bring
to
its
western
neighbour.
Streets
and
transport
provisions
is
a
key
area
of
concern
raised
in
public
submissions
regarding
the
Wentworth
DCP,
with
particular
focus
on
parking,
traffic,
public
transport
and
pedestrian
and
cycle
access
which
are
all
a
bi-‐product
of
high
density
housing
(NSW
Department
of
Planning
&
Infrastructure,
page
6).
The
primary
objective
for
the
UAP
should
be
to
manage
public
transport
inefficiencies
for
stakeholders,
thereby
reducing
the
reliance
of
private
vehicles.
Besides
widening
roads
and
assuring
street
parking
is
on
all
local
streets
throughout
the
residential
precincts,
alleviating
traffic
and
parking
concerns
is
best
managed
through
the
public
transport
network.
Additional
ferry
services
and
extended
hours
of
operation
for
buses
will
achieve
this
objective,
as
well
as
improve
the
connectivity
with
the
neighbouring
precincts,
being
a
fundamental
objective
of
the
DCP.
Extending
already
existing
pedestrian
and
cycle
lanes
and
improving
bicycle
undercover
protection
and
security
around
the
public
transport
hubs,
will
improve
the
connectivity
and
accessibility
for
stakeholders
and
reduce
their
reliance
on
private
vehicles.
Assuring
the
activation
and
lighting
of
open
space
corridors
and
foreshore
paths
will
also
improve
connectivity
for
stakeholders
other
than
cars.
The
successful
integration
of
high
density
built
forms,
open
spaces
and
street
and
transport
provisions
contribute
to
the
vision
of
the
Wentworth
DCP.
An
increase
of
high-‐density
living
will
always
impact
on
the
natural
environment
of
the
surrounding
area
and
the
quality
of
living
for
the
residence.
“We
must
provide
facilities
for
recreation,
reset
and
relaxation
that
are
available
to
all
citizens
in
every
walk
of
life.
We
must
consider
the
urban
citizen
who
wants
his
recreation
within
the
city.
We
must,
in
particular,
consider
the
pressing
need
of
the
low-‐income
families
living
amid
the
congestion,
noise,
drabness,
and
unbroken
monotony
of
asphalt
and
brick
characteristic
of
the
deprived
areas
of
our
cities.
Here,
obviously,
we
have
the
greatest
deficit
of
green
space
and
recreational
facilities.”
Seymour
Jr.
W.
page
3.
Public
Realm
• What
are
the
specific
strategies
applied
to
creating
a
meaningful
public
realm?
• What
are
the
successful
and
less
successful
urban
design
elements
of
the
public
realm?
The
primary
focus
of
public
realms
should
be
on
how
people
interact
with
their
surrounding
environment;
ARC,
page
1.
The
public
realms
of
the
Wentworth
DCP
include
the
streets
and
pathways,
open
spaces,
parks
and
parks,
as
well
as
the
public
buildings
and
facilities.
Sustainable
design
strategies
to
improve
streetscapes
within
the
context
of
a
public
realm
focus
on
aesthetics,
connectivity,
health
and
social
functionality,
while
also
optimizing
local
economic
trade.
Streets
and
pathways
within
the
Wentworth
DCP
succeed
on
an
aesthetic
level
by
introducing
tree
lines
and
landscaped
gardens
wherever
possible
that
divide
the
high
level
built
form.
On
a
functional
level,
pathways
are
wide
to
promote
foot
traffic
and
include
street
furniture
(benches)
for
convenience.
The
majority
of
streets
include
cycle
paths
to
reduce
the
community’s
reliance
on
private
vehicles
whilst
optimizing
space
on
both
sides
of
the
street
for
parallel
parking.
Shop
frontages
and
awnings
are
easily
visible
and
accessible
to
promote
the
economic
landscape.
Safety
it
prioritized
with
site
access
for
emergency
vehicles,
wide
and
flat
pathways
and
both
street
and
pedestrian
lighting.
Within
the
high-‐density
residential
precincts,
parking
will
always
be
limited
and
the
DCP
public
realm
streetscape
has
not
done
enough
to
manage
demand.
Streets
are
not
equipped
to
handle
traffic
congestion
with
limited
road
access
points,
further
emphasized
on
weekends
and
during
public
events
at
Olympic
Park.
Besides
widening
streets,
the
best
means
to
reduce
the
pressure
of
the
existing
road
network
is
better
public
transport
connectivity,
extended
hours
of
operation
and
regularity.
The
open
spaces,
parks
and
parks
and
natural
corridors
are
a
well
thought
out
asset
of
the
Wentworth
DCP
public
realm.
“It
is
the
redevelopment
of
the
smaller
parks,
reserves
and
street
closures
that
makes
a
difference
to
the
local
community.”,
Jasprizza,
R,
page
292-‐294.
They
are
strategically
designed
in
a
manner
that
is
visually
appealing,
practical,
connected
and
sustainable,
while
responding
to
the
recreational
needs
of
the
community.
The
quality
landscape
design
and
positioning
of
the
parks
influence
the
character
and
image
of
the
public
realm,
whilst
creating
a
positive
impact
on
the
health,
wellbeing
and
social
interaction
of
the
residence.
The
parks
are
multi-‐functional
and
adaptable
to
the
needs
of
the
residence,
particularly
around
the
eastern
peninsula,
which
promotes
interaction
for
a
wider
demographic.
The
peninsula
park
and
wetlands
in
particular
promote
environmental
sustainability,
biodiversity
and
connection
with
the
natural
landscape,
which
was
an
objective
of
the
DCP.
The
less
successful
elements
of
public
realm
in
relation
to
the
parks
and
open
spaces
could
focus
on
the
wetlands
area,
whist
being
aesthetically
appealing,
it
may
not
meet
the
needs
of
the
recreational
demands
for
the
local
residence.
The
financial
sustainability
of
the
open
parks
and
recreational
areas
is
critical
and
may
need
to
be
addressed,
to
ensure
sustainable
ongoing
maintenance
costs
and
achieve
projected
life
cycles
(Public
Realm
–
Urban
Design
Guidelines,
Page
23)
Public
buildings
and
facilities
have
been
well
addressed,
with
particular
attention
around
the
Ferry
Wharf,
foreshore
walks
and
the
maritime
plaza.
The
foreshore
walks
are
strategically
activated
to
improve
accessibility
to
the
ferry
wharf
as
well
as
connection
between
the
two
residential
precincts.
The
Homebush
Bay
foreshore
and
maritime
plaza
strategically
activates
the
space
to
create
social
interaction,
exemplified
by
the
rowing
and
yacht
club
facilities.
The
connectivity
of
the
ferry
wharf
is
a
less
successful
element
of
the
public
realm,
with
no
bicycle
storage
facilities,
limited
parking
and
poorly
synchronized
connections
with
the
bus
transport.
The
DCP
also
does
not
address
public
buildings
such
as
a
library
or
community
halls.
Investing
in
quality
public
places
is
essential
for
a
well-‐balanced,
socially
inclusive
community
and
boosts
confidence
for
an
area.
A
high
standard
of
public
realms
stimulate
growth
in
the
visitor
economy,
increase
the
price
of
property
as
well
as
the
income
and
profit
for
local
businesses.
Health
and
Public
Safety
• What
types
of
design
solutions
have
been
suggested
to
improve
public
health
and
safety?
Design
solutions
of
the
DCP
revolve
around
outdoor
living
and
a
connection
with
the
natural
environment.
Green
infrastructure
and
the
connection
between
residential
built
forms
and
green
open
spaces
emphasize
health
and
safety
and
community
living
and
engagement.
The
Wentworth
DCP
uses
principles
recommended
in
Crime
Prevention
through
Environmental
Design
(CPTED)
to
mitigate
antisocial
behavior
(Wentworth
Point
Precinct
DCP
2014,
page
30).
Such
design
solutions
include;
• Casual
surveillance
in
all
public
realms,
• Adequate
lighting
on
streets
and
walkway
• Maximizing
visibility
into
building
entrances
and
ground
floor
dwelling
fronts.
• Where
possible,
buildings
are
designed
with
glass
panels
and
openings
so
lifts,
lobbies
and
openings
are
clearly
visible
from
public
domains.
Safety
has
been
heightened
with
improvements
made
to
the
connectivity
of
public
transport,
such
as
synchronizing
timetables
of
trains,
buses
and
ferries.
In
the
design
of
streets
and
built
forms,
safety
is
prioritized
with
site
access
for
emergency
vehicles
and
allocated
speed
zones
in
relevant
areas
(schools,
high
density
housing
areas,
etc)
As
mentioned
previously
and
in
relation
to
public
health,
wide
pathways
and
cycle
paths
are
evident
to
optimize
foot
traffic
and
activity,
reducing
the
reliance
of
private
vehicles
for
connectivity.
The
foreshore
is
activated
and
designed
to
promote
health
and
walkability.
Parks
and
open-‐spaces
are
multi-‐functional
with
recreational
spaces
to
promote
outdoor
living,
as
well
as
the
rowing
and
yacht
club
to
emphasize
sport
and
physical
activity.
Green
Infrastructure
• What
are
the
green
infrastructure
(landscaping,
trees,
vertical
gardens/green
roof
and
urban
food
production)
and
recommendations
for
creating
a
better
quality
of
urban
living?
The
vision
of
the
DCP
is
to
embrace
the
locality
and
natural
environment
has
been
achieved
by
limiting
the
impact
on
the
waterfront,
wetlands
and
already
existing
natural
settings.
Typologies
of
green
infrastructure
are
evident
throughout
the
DCP,
with
the
landscaping
of
tree-‐lined
streets,
the
abundance
of
open
spaces
and
activation
of
the
waterfront.
Where
practical
the
streets
are
lined
with
trees
and
green
gardens,
which
strategically
break
up
the
built
forms
in
high-‐density
areas.
Green
infrastructure
is
evident
in
the
parks
and
open
linear
spaces
(corridors),
creating
a
natural
connectivity
between
the
residential
built
forms
and
the
activated
waterfront.
The
landscaping
of
the
foreshore
includes
trees
and
natural
gardens
to
promote
an
emotional
connection
between
the
residence
and
the
natural
environment.
The
recreation
park
along
the
peninsula
adapts
to
the
wetlands,
the
objective
of
design
being
to
limit
the
impact
of
the
green
environment
whilst
creating
a
network
of
walkways
for
the
residence
to
connect
and
benefit
from
the
natural
setting.
Place
Making
• Have
other
techniques
(if
any,
except
above
questions)
been
incorporated
in
urban
design
strategies
for
the
UAP
to
enhance
place
making
for
communities?
Place
making
strategies
that
enhance
the
community
should
capitalize
on
the
assets
within
the
public
realm.
Its
inspiration
should
come
from
the
community
itself
and
contribute
to
the
public’s
health,
happiness
and
wellbeing
(Project
for
Public
Places,
p1).
Public
art
and
interactive
open
spaces
are
examples
of
place
making
strategies
that
create
community
involvement
and
wellbeing.
Public
art
is
located
in
key
focal
points
throughout
the
residential
precincts
and
open
spaces,
helping
to
generate
community
identity
and
maximizes
visibility
in
key
areas.
The
use
of
public
art
helps
define
areas
and
creates
a
sense
of
pride
for
the
community.
The
outdoor
landscape
creates
community
interaction
through
the
use
of
public
furniture
along
streets
and
walkways,
outdoors
dining
along
the
waterfront
and
recreational
areas.
Built
forms
along
the
waterfront
such
as
the
outdoor
dining,
plaza
and
rowing
and
yacht
club
provide
space
for
community
engagement
and
utilizes
the
foreshore
and
river
as
a
community
asset.
Key
Recommendations
and
conclusions:
Overall
the
objective
of
providing
sustainable
living
that
embraces
the
natural
surroundings
and
acts
as
an
extension
of
the
existing
surrounding
activated
precincts,
is
well
detailed
in
the
Wentworth
DCP.
There
are
areas
that
can
be
improved
to
provide
a
higher
quality
of
living
for
its
residence,
which
has
been
outlined
below;
• The
DCP
does
not
detail
adequate
facilities
for
community
use,
such
as
a
library
or
community
hall.
A
library/community
hall
would
benefit
place
making
and
community
engagement.
If
height
restrictions
permit,
a
library
above
the
plaza
or
a
community
hall
within
the
maritime
precinct
would
be
well
positioned
nearby
the
school
and
around
the
activated
waterfront
by
Homebush
Bay.
• The
DCP
fails
in
its
objective
of
being
an
extension
of
the
surrounding
activated
communities,
due
to
the
poor
public
transport
connectivity.
Connections
between
precincts
can
be
improved
with
synchronised
timetables
between
each
mode
of
public
transport
(train,
bus,
ferry),
as
well
as
improved
parking
and
cycle
storage
nearby
transport
nodes.
• The
western
residential
neighbourhood
is
isolated,
with
limited
connectivity
to
its
eastern
neighbour.
The
eastern
residential
precinct
benefits
from
much
more
activity
and
public
realms
(school,
wetlands,
peninsula,
waterfront,
etc).
The
waterfront
along
Parramatta
River
could
benefit
from
further
activation
such
as
outdoor
dining
and
retail
that
makes
the
Homebush
Bay
foreshore
path
so
affective.
• Currently
the
only
sporting
ground
that
exist
in
the
UAP
belong
to
the
school.
The
precinct
would
benefit
from
a
shared
school/community
use
of
the
school
playing
field
outside
of
school
hours.
• There
are
no
landmarks
within
the
UAP.
Excluding
public
art,
an
easily
identifiable
physical
object
in
the
urban
landscape
would
help
community
pride
as
well
as
act
as
a
point
of
reference
for
key
areas
of
the
precinct.
References:
1. FAO
Corporate
Document
Repository,
(1995).
Planning
for
sustainable
use
of
land
resources;
Towards
a
new
approach.
Available
at
http://www.fao.org/docrep/v8047e/v8047e05.htm.
(accessed
30.05.16)
2. NSW
Department
of
Planning
&
Infrastructure
(2014).
Wentworth
Point
Urban
Activation
Precinct
Finalisation
Report,
page
6.
Available
at
http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/~/media/Files/DPE/Reports/we
ntworth-‐point-‐urban-‐activation-‐precinct-‐finalisation-‐report-‐
2014.ashx
(accessed
23.05.16)
3. ARC.
What
is
a
Public
Realm,
page
1.
Available
at
http://www.arc-‐
online.co.uk/public-‐realm/what-‐is-‐public-‐realm,
(accessed
20.05.16)
4. Local
Government
Association
of
South
Australia,
Public
Realm
–
Urban
Design
Guidelines,
Page
23,
Available
at
https://www.lga.sa.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/Public%20Re
alm%20Urban%20Design%20Guidelines.pdf
(Accessed
23.05.16)
5. Projects
for
Public
Spaces,
What
is
Place
Making,
p1.
Available
at
http://www.pps.org/reference/what_is_placemaking/
(accessed
28.05.16)
6. Jasprizza,
Roger.
“Small
Spaces
Make
a
Difference”
Landscape
Australia
1999
Nov.-‐2000
Jan.,
v.21,
n.4
(84),
p.292-‐294
7. Robert
C.
Weaver,
Seymour
Jr.
W.
“Recreational
Needs
in
Urban
Areas”
(From
Whitney
North
Seymour
Jr.
An
Introduction
to
Small
Urban
Spaces,
p3.