digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 51
Figure 4.1.45 chart of 17
th
Question by low- proficiency level
Figure 4.1.46 chart of 17
th
Question by intermediate-
proficiency level
i. Note-taking Strategies
In this study, this strategy is represented in items questions number 17, Taking notes on the important points of
the text.
1. Taking notes on the important points of the text. items
number 17
Based on the chart above, the low-proficiency level show that 8 of 25 students rarely taking notes on the important
point of the text and 3 of 25 students did not use that strategy. While the intermediate-proficiency level show that
10 of 24 students usually taking notes on the important point of the text and 3 of 25 students did not use that strategy. It
shows the intermediate-proficiency level often written down key word of the text and it can help them to organize the
important information and get completely comprehending reading rather than the low-proficiency level.
2 5
7 8
3 2
4
6 8
10
1 10
8
2 3
2 4
6 8
10 12
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 52
Figure 4.1.47 chart of 22
th
Question by low- proficiency level
Figure 4.1.48 chart of 22
th
Question by intermediate-
proficiency level
j. Summarizing Strategies
In this study, this strategy is represented in items questions number 22, summarizing the main ideas.
1. Summarizing the main ideas.items number 22
Based on the chart above, the low-proficiency cy level show that 11 of 25 students sometimes summarizing the main
ideas and 3 of 25 students were not used that strategy. While the intermediate-proficiency level show that 9 of 24 students
sometimes summarizing the main ideas and 3 of 24 students did not use that strategy.
In addition, the use of twenty-four individual reading strategies are summarized under the heading of pre-reading,
while reading, and post-reading and analyzed based on the categorization of 10 categories based on low-proficiency level
and intermediate-proficiency level in table 4.1.1 as below:
3 4
11 4
3 2
4 6
8 10
12
2 7
9 3
3 2
4 6
8 10
