Vegetation Analysis RESULT AND DISCUSSION

4.4. Accuracy Assessment

We use accuracy assessment in order to get information about this model representation in other area. We are selecting 1,149 Ha from 2,300 Ha research areas as accuracy assessment area. Accuracy assessments were conducted by implementing the model into accuracy assessment area and developing the suitability habitat for Anoa. Sampling area and accuracy assessment area were randomly generated from overall research area. Accuracy assessment classified 968 grid observations from 1,039 absence grid area, or 93.64 correctly classified, as not suitable habitat for Anoa and classified 103 grids from 110 grids as presence classified or suitable habitat for Anoa or 93.17 from total presence area in sampling grid. Overall classification accuracy resulted 93.21 from total accuracy assessment area were correctly classified. Overall accuracy assessment result indicate this model have high accuracy in predicting suitable habitat of Anoa and considered can represent overall parameter in predicting Anoa habitat suitability.

4.5. Vegetation Analysis

Vegetation analysis was conducted in purpose to get detail information about the vegetation structure where Anoa presence. In vegetation analysis we use purposive sampling method to distribute nested plots for vegetation analysis. Purposive sampling was used in selecting the study area since a specific characteristic of the area is required for the study, in this study the specific characteristics is location where Anoa presence. In vegetation analysis plants are classified into tree woody plants which has diameter at breast high more than 20 cm, poles woody plants which has diameter at breast high from 10 to 20 cm, sapling woody plants which has diameter at breast less than 10 cm and height more than 1.5 meter, seedling woody plants with height up to 1.5 meter, and undergrowth plant like herbs, ferns, liana, and grasses. The plot sizes in vegetation analysis are 20 x 20 m for trees, 10 x 10 m for poles, 5 x 5 m for sapling and 2 x 2 m for seedling and undergrowth plant. In this survey we conducted vegetation analysis in 24 sampling plot. Table 4.3 Seedling and Undergrowth Vegetation No. Local Name Scientific Name Family K KR F FR INP 1 Karondowana Alpinia galanga Zingiberaceae 625.00 5.08 0.25 5.26 10.35 2 Karondo Alpinia sp Zingiberaceae 625.00 5.08 0.25 5.26 10.35 3 Kurio Ardisia sp Myrsinaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 4 Asplenium sp1 Aspleniaceae 208.33 1.69 0.08 1.75 3.45 5 Asplenium sp2 Aspleniaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 6 Asplenium sp3 Aspleniaceae 208.33 1.69 0.08 1.75 3.45 7 Begonia sp Begoniaceae 625.00 5.08 0.21 4.39 9.47 8 Unidentified Rubiaceae 312.50 2.54 0.13 2.63 5.17 9 Rotan Kapingei Calamus sp1 Arecaceae 937.50 7.63 0.38 7.89 15.52 10 Rotan Noko Calamus sp2 Arecaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 11 Rotan Wana Calamus sp3 Arecaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 12 Pakis pohon Cyathea contamminans Cyatheaceae 416.67 3.39 0.17 3.51 6.90 13 Davallia sp1 Davalliaceae 416.67 3.39 0.17 3.51 6.90 14 Davallia sp2 Davalliaceae 208.33 1.69 0.08 1.75 3.45 15 Walopore Dinochloa barbata Poaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 16 Bambu halus Dinochloa sp Poaceae 416.67 3.39 0.17 3.51 6.90 17 Diplazium pallidum Athyriaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 18 Ehawana Dipteris conjugata Polypodiaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 19 Drynaria rigidula s.wbedd Polypodiaceae 208.33 1.69 0.04 0.88 2.57 20 Katatuma Elatostema sp Urticaceae 729.17 5.93 0.29 6.14 12.07 21 Euria sp Theaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 22 Langka Frecynetia insignis Blume Frecynnetiaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 23 Kabubakangkaloka Garcinia sp Clusiaceae 208.33 1.69 0.08 1.75 3.45 24 Geniophlebium sp Aspiadaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 25 Lumut Hypnodendron dendroides Hypnodendraceae 416.67 3.39 0.17 3.51 6.90 26 Tatari Kilingia sp Cyperaceae 208.33 1.69 0.08 1.75 3.45 27 Laviera montana Becc Monimiaceae 312.50 2.54 0.13 2.63 5.17 28 Lindsaea sp Lindsaeaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 29 Baka Litsea sp Lauraceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 30 Lygodium circinnatum Schizaeacea 208.33 1.69 0.08 1.75 3.45 31 Lambori Pandanus sarasinorum Pandanaceae 416.67 3.39 0.17 3.51 6.90 32 Pandan Pandanus sp Pandanaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 33 Pinang hijau Pinanga caessia Blume Arecaceae 1041.67 8.47 0.38 7.89 16.37 34 Balu Piper sp Piperaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 35 Psychotria malayana Jack Rubiaceae 416.67 3.39 0.17 3.51 6.90 36 Schefflera sp Araliaceae 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 37 Kadamuku Smilax leuchophylla Smilaceae 520.83 4.24 0.21 4.39 8.62 No. Local Name Scientific Name Family K KR F FR INP 38 Makubana Syzygium accuminatissima Myrtaceae 312.50 2.54 0.13 2.63 5.17 39 Syzygium sp3 Myrtaceae 416.67 3.39 0.17 3.51 6.90 40 Marangkappi Urophyllum sp Rubiaceae 208.33 1.69 0.04 0.88 2.57 41 Gaharu 104.17 0.85 0.04 0.88 1.72 From the table above we can see there are 41 species from 26 family of seedling and undergrowth plant in our sampling plot. From vegetation found in this plot, 20 species from 13 families were known as Anoa feed. Those vegetations that identified as Anoa feed are mostly from Arecaceae, Pandanaceae, Poaceae, Myrtaceae, and Zingiberaceae family. Pinanga caessia Blume from family Arecaceae which also identified as Anoa feed has the highest value in importance value. Pinanga caessia Blume also has the highest value in frequency value and density. This condition explains that Pinanga caessia Blume were found in many plot of sample we made. Which also means this species dominated the structure condition of sapling and undergrowth plan. Pinanga caessia Blume and Alpinia sp. were analyzed has high value in important value. From this analysis we can see that location where Anoa was found is rich of feed supply for Anoa. The domination of vegetation that identified as Anoa feed shows that; feed supply for Anoa still in good condition. The result from seedling undergrowth plant plot is maybe can explain Anoa feed supply because seedling and undergrowth plant is the vegetation that can be reached by Anoa. Anoa was also known like to consume the sprout of seedling plant. Table 4.4 Sapling Vegetation No Local Name Scientific Name Family K KR F FR INP 1 Damar Agathis celebica Koord Warb Araucariaceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 2 Kurio Ardisia sp Myrsinaceae 33.33 2.22 0.08 2.60 4.82 3 Pinang merahHarao Areca vestiarea Giseke Arecaceae 33.33 2.22 0.04 1.30 3.52 4 Unidentified Myrsinaceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 5 Unidentified Rubiaceae 33.33 2.22 0.08 2.60 4.82 6 Unidentified Lauraceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 7 Unidentified Unidentified 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 8 Urio Chionanthus nitens Oleaceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 9 Palohawana Chionantus Oleaceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 No Local Name Scientific Name Family K KR F FR INP ramiflorus 10 Chisocheton sp Meliaceae 50.00 3.33 0.13 3.90 7.23 11 Pakis pohon Cyathea contamminans Cyatheaceae 100.00 6.67 0.25 7.79 14.46 12 Taiti Disoxyllun sp Meliaceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 13 Tomanete Eurya accuminata Theaceae 33.33 2.22 0.08 2.60 4.82 14 Langka Freycinnetia insignis Freycinnetiaceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 15 Kabubakangkaloka Garcinia sp Clusiaceae 66.67 4.44 0.17 5.19 9.64 16 Hukawana Gnetum sp Gnetaceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 17 Mpomaria Litsea sp Lauraceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 18 Palili Lythocarpus celebicus Fagaceae 183.33 12.22 0.21 6.49 18.72 19 Lambori Pandanus sarasinorum Pandanaceae 33.33 2.22 0.08 2.60 4.82 20 Kau sop Phyllocladus hypophyllus Hook.F Podocarpaceae 133.33 8.89 0.25 7.79 16.68 21 Pinang hijauGompu Pinanga caessia Blume Arecaceae 166.67 11.11 0.29 9.09 20.20 22 Marangkappi Saurauia sp Actinidaceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 23 Sterculia oblogata Sterculiaceae 33.33 2.22 0.04 1.30 3.52 24 Makubana Syzygium accuminatissima Myrtaceae 133.33 8.89 0.33 10.39 19.28 25 Jambu jambu Syzygium sp1 Myrtaceae 50.00 3.33 0.13 3.90 7.23 26 Syzygium sp3 Myrtaceae 100.00 6.67 0.25 7.79 14.46 27 Timonius sp Rubiaceae 33.33 2.22 0.08 2.60 4.82 28 Ampoiwana Viburnum sambucinum Caprifoliaceae 33.33 2.22 0.08 2.60 4.82 29 Dolo Viburnum sp Caprifoliaceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 30 Karanahi Viburnum sp2 Caprifoliaceae 16.67 1.11 0.04 1.30 2.41 31 Gaharu 33.33 2.22 0.08 2.60 4.82 From Table 4.4 we can see in sapling sampling plot there are 31 species from 18 family of plant in this plot. Pinanga Caessia Blume also has the highest importance value in this sampling plot. While other species like Lythocarpus celebicus, Cyathea contamminan, Phyllocladus hypophyllus and Syzygium accuminatissima also have high value in importance value. Some of the species like Lythocarpus celebicus was known produce fruit that is feed for Anoa. In this sapling plot, 10 species from 7 families are identified as Anoa feed vegetation. From 10 species, five of them are dominated this plot. Those vegetations are Pinanga caessia Blume, Cyathea contamminans, Lythocarpus celebicus, Syzygium accuminatissima, and Syzygium sp. Domination of Anoa feed vegetation indicated the food availability in sapling plant still can meet Anoa demand of nutrition. Table 4.5 Poles Vegetation No Local Name Scientific Name Family K KR F FR D DR INP 1 Damar Agathis celebicaKoord Warb Araucariaceae 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.11 1.56 3.93 2 Pinang merah Areca vestiarea Giseke Arecaceae 12.50 2.75 0.04 1.45 0.10 1.55 5.75 3 Unidentified Unidentified 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.04 0.58 2.95 4 Kaha Castanopsis accuminatissima Fagaceae 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.11 1.56 3.93 5 Pakis pohon Cyathea contamminans Cyatheaceae 70.83 15.60 0.54 18.84 1.02 15.09 49.53 6 Loncaibo Dysoxyllun sp Meliaceae 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.07 1.09 3.45 7 Baka Litsea sp Lauraceae 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.03 0.48 2.85 8 Palili Lythocarpus celebicus Fagaceae 70.83 15.60 0.50 17.39 1.32 19.54 52.53 9 Nggera Myristica sp Myristicaceae 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.07 1.09 3.45 10 Lebanu kuni Neonuclea sp Rubiaceae 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.11 1.56 3.93 11 Kume Palaquium quercifolium Sapotaceae 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.11 1.56 3.93 12 Lambori Pandanus sarasinorum Pandanaceae 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.03 0.48 2.85 13 Kau sop Phyllocladus hypophyllus Podocarpaceae 33.33 7.34 0.25 8.70 0.45 6.63 22.66 14 Pinang hijau Pinanga caessia Blume Arecaceae 125.00 27.52 0.38 13.04 1.31 19.35 59.91 15 Makubana Syzygium accuminatissima Myrtaceae 54.17 11.93 0.33 11.59 1.19 17.60 41.12 16 Syzygium sp1 Myrtaceae 12.50 2.75 0.13 4.35 0.18 2.73 9.83 17 Syzygium sp2 Myrtaceae 8.33 1.83 0.04 1.45 0.09 1.40 4.68 18 Syzygium sp3 Myrtaceae 20.83 4.59 0.21 7.25 0.29 4.24 16.07 19 Bakalopi Rubiaceae 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.06 0.82 3.18 20 Bekawa 4.17 0.92 0.04 1.45 0.07 1.09 3.45 From the table above there are 20 species from 12 family of plant in poles category. Pinanga caessia Blume are the plant with the highest importance value. Other species that also have high importance value are Lythocarpus celebicus, Cyathea contamminans, and Syzygium accuminatissima. The result from poles sampling plot have a similar result with the sapling plot. There are several species that dominated both sampling plot. Those species are Pinanga caessia Blume, Lythocarpus celebicus, Cyathea contamminans, and Syzygium accuminatissima. In pole plot analysis, 9 species from 5 families were identified as Anoa feed vegetation. Dominated vegetation from this plot also represent the Anoa feed vegetation. Myrtaceae and Arecaceae family dominated this plot as representation of Anoa feed vegetation. Comparing with sapling plot, Anoa feed vegetation which dominated the plot have similarities in species. Those species dominated the both sampling plot in significant value than other species. Table 4.6 Tree Vegetation No Local Name Scientific Name Family K KR F FR D DR INP 1 Damar Agathis celebica Koord Warb Araucariaceae 20.83 14.08 0.50 13.33 3.52 22.21 49.63 2 Bekawa 4.17 2.82 0.08 2.22 0.47 2.98 8.02 3 sp1 Myrsinaceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.04 0.23 2.04 4 sp2 Lauraceae 3.13 2.11 0.08 2.22 0.25 1.58 5.91 5 sp3 Rubiaceae 4.17 2.82 0.13 3.33 0.29 1.81 7.96 6 sp4 Unidentified 4.17 2.82 0.08 2.22 0.46 2.90 7.93 7 sp5 Unidentified 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.12 0.74 2.56 8 sp6 Unidentified 2.08 1.41 0.08 2.22 0.25 1.59 5.22 9 Towako Calophyllum sp Clusiaceae 2.08 1.41 0.04 1.11 0.11 0.67 3.19 10 Kaha Castanopsis accuminatissima Fagaceae 5.21 3.52 0.08 2.22 1.08 6.82 12.57 11 Palohawana Chionantus ramiflorus Oleaceae 3.13 2.11 0.04 1.11 0.26 1.66 4.88 12 Pakanangi Cinnamommum parthenoxyllon Lauraceae 2.08 1.41 0.08 2.22 0.17 1.10 4.73 13 Kau Pangkao Dacrydium sp Podocarpaceae 2.08 1.41 0.04 1.11 0.20 1.27 3.79 14 Loncaibo Dysoxyllun sp Meliaceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.08 0.53 2.34 15 Wonce Euodia celebica Hask Rutaceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.10 0.63 2.45 16 Tomanete Eurya accuminata Theaceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.09 0.56 2.38 17 Mompo Ficus cellosa Moraceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.04 0.25 2.06 18 Langka Freycinnetia insignis Freycinnetiaceae 5.21 3.52 0.08 2.22 0.21 1.30 7.05 19 Palili Lythocarpus celebicus Fagaceae 18.75 12.68 0.50 13.33 1.62 10.24 36.25 20 Palili pohu Lythocarpus havilandii Fagaceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.12 0.74 2.56 21 Lythocarpus sp1 Fagaceae 3.13 2.11 0.04 1.11 0.19 1.18 4.40 22 Nggera Myristica vatua Myristicaceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.05 0.32 2.14 23 Lebanukuni Neonauclea sp Rubiaceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.12 0.74 2.56 24 Benuang Octomeles sumatrana Datistaceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.59 3.73 5.54 25 Kume Palaquium quercifolium Magnoliaceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.08 0.53 2.34 26 Kau sop Phyllocladus hypophyllus Podocarpaceae 6.25 4.23 0.17 4.44 0.46 2.91 11.58 27 Kau vatu Planchonella nitida Sapotaceae 2.08 1.41 0.04 1.11 0.23 1.45 3.97 28 Rododendron sp Ericaceae 4.17 2.82 0.13 3.33 0.48 3.01 9.16 29 Sterculia oblogata Sterculiaceae 4.17 2.82 0.08 2.22 0.36 2.27 7.31 30 Makubana Syzygium accuminatissima Myrtaceae 19.79 13.38 0.46 12.22 2.05 12.91 38.51 31 Syzygium sp1 Myrtaceae 4.17 2.82 0.08 2.22 0.35 2.23 7.27 32 Syzygium sp2 Myrtaceae 2.08 1.41 0.08 2.22 0.27 1.70 5.33 No Local Name Scientific Name Family K KR F FR D DR INP 33 Syzygium sp3 Myrtaceae 10.42 7.04 0.25 6.67 0.84 5.31 19.02 34 Syzygium sp4 Myrtaceae 1.04 0.70 0.04 1.11 0.11 0.71 2.52 35 Dolo Viburnum sp Caprifoliaceae 2.08 1.41 0.08 2.22 0.19 1.19 4.82 There are 35 species from 20 families in sampling plot which have diameter more than 20 cm or categorize as tree. Most of the species are endemic to Sulawesi Island. In tree plot sampling species that have the highest importance value are Agathis celebica. Importance value mean the vegetation which had high value in importance value are the vegetation which dominated in term of density, frequency, and basal area for poles and tree plot. In tree plot sampling Agathis celebica dominated because this species found in large number of plot and has a big diameter. Other species that also have high importance value is Lythocarpus celebicus or known as Palili for native Sulawesi people. Different with other plots, tree plot analysis recorded 7 species from 3 families which dominated from Myrtaceae family which commonly found in vegetation analysis sampling plot. Myrtaceae tree are dominated in term of family class of vegetation for overall vegetation record. Lythocarpus celebicus were species that have the highest value in importance value. Dominance of Lythocarpus celebicus tree which found in where Anoa sign were found probably considered as Anoa favorite place for find feed. Lythocarpus celebicus tree produce fruit that known as Anoa favorite feed. In some shelter, Palili fruit were found inside the shelter. From overall vegetation analysis, 25 species from 14 families Anoa feed were found in vegetation analysis sampling plot. Pinanga caessia Blume, Alpinia sp., Cyathea contamminans, Frecynetia insignis Blume, Syzygium accuminatissima, and Lythocarpus celebicus were commonly found in each plot and each class of vegetation. Beside those dominant vegetation, there also found others vegetation like Elastotema sp., Begonia sp., Pandanus sp., Piper sp., Dinochloa sp., Garcinia sp., Syzygium sp., Drynaria rigidula, Smilax leuchophylla, and some species from Zingiberaceae and Arecaceae family in sampling plot. There also some vegetation that not identified yet from it species and family. Figure 4.22 Palili Fruit

4.6. Morphometric