sigma11-048. 424KB Jun 04 2011 12:10:52 AM

Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications

SIGMA 7 (2011), 048, 15 pages

Superintegrable Oscillator and Kepler Systems
on Spaces of Nonconstant Curvature
via the St¨
ackel Transform⋆
´
Angel
BALLESTEROS † , Alberto ENCISO ‡ , Francisco J. HERRANZ † , Orlando RAGNISCO §
and Danilo RIGLIONI §


Departamento de F´ısica, Universidad de Burgos, E-09001 Burgos, Spain
E-mail: angelb@ubu.es, fjherranz@ubu.es



Instituto de Ciencias Matem´
aticas (CSIC-UAM-UCM-UC3M), Consejo Superior

de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas, C/ Nicol´
as Cabrera 14-16, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
E-mail: aenciso@icmat.es

§

Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`
a di Roma Tre and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
sezione di Roma Tre, Via Vasca Navale 84, I-00146 Roma, Italy
E-mail: ragnisco@fis.uniroma3.it, riglioni@fis.uniroma3.it

Received March 18, 2011, in final form May 12, 2011; Published online May 14, 2011
doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2011.048
Abstract. The St¨ackel transform is applied to the geodesic motion on Euclidean space,
through the harmonic oscillator and Kepler–Coloumb potentials, in order to obtain maximally superintegrable classical systems on N -dimensional Riemannian spaces of nonconstant curvature. By one hand, the harmonic oscillator potential leads to two families of
superintegrable systems which are interpreted as an intrinsic Kepler–Coloumb system on
a hyperbolic curved space and as the so-called Darboux III oscillator. On the other, the
Kepler–Coloumb potential gives rise to an oscillator system on a spherical curved space as
well as to the Taub-NUT oscillator. Their integrals of motion are explicitly given. The
role of the (flat/curved) Fradkin tensor and Laplace–Runge–Lenz N -vector for all of these

Hamiltonians is highlighted throughout the paper. The corresponding quantum maximally
superintegrable systems are also presented.
Key words: coupling constant metamorphosis; integrable systems; curvature; harmonic oscillator; Kepler–Coulomb; Fradkin tensor; Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector; Taub-NUT; Darboux
surfaces
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 37J35; 70H06; 81R12

1

Introduction

The coupling constant metamorphosis or St¨ackel transform was formerly introduced in [1, 2] and
further developed and applied to several classical and quantum Hamiltonian systems in [3, 4, 5,
6, 7]. This approach has proven to be a useful tool in order to relate different (super)integrable
systems together with their associated symmetries and to deduce new integrable Hamiltonian
systems starting from known ones.
For our purposes, the classical St¨
ackel transform can be briefly summarized as follows [3, 4].
Consider the conjugate coordinates and momenta q, p ∈ RN with canonical Poisson bracket



This paper is a contribution to the Special Issue “Symmetry, Separation, Super-integrability and Special
Functions (S4 )”. The full collection is available at http://www.emis.de/journals/SIGMA/S4.html

´ Ballesteros, A. Enciso, F.J. Herranz, O. Ragnisco and D. Riglioni
A.

2

{qi , pj } = δij and the notation:
q2 =

N
X

qi2 ,

p2 =

i=1


N
X

p2i ,

i=1

|q| =

p
q2 .

˜ the “final” system given
Let H be an “initial” Hamiltonian, HU an “intermediate” one and H
by
H=

p2
+ V (q),
µ(q)


HU =

p2
+ U (q),
µ(q)

2
˜ = H = p + V˜ (q),
H
U
µ
˜(q)

(1.1)

such that µ
˜ = µU and V˜ = V /U . Then, each second-order integral of motion (symmetry) S
˜ through an “intermediate” symmetry SU of HU .
of H leads to a new one S˜ corresponding to H

In particular, if S and SU are written as
S=

N
X

aij (q)pi pj + W (q) = S0 + W (q),

SU = S0 + WU (q),

(1.2)

i,j=1

˜ in the form
then one gets a second-order symmetry of H
˜
S˜ = S0 − WU H.

(1.3)


The aim of this paper is to apply the above procedure when the “initial” Hamiltonian H is
the N -dimensional (N D) free Euclidean motion, and when HU is either the isotropic harmonic
oscillator or the Kepler–Coulomb (KC) Hamiltonian. It is well known that these three systems
are maximally superintegrable (MS), that is, they are endowed with the maximum number of
2N − 1 functionally independent integrals of motion (in these cases, all of them are quadratic
in the momenta). These three systems and their MS property are briefly recalled in the next
˜ that
section, and we will see that the St¨
ackel transform gives rise to several MS systems H
are defined on Riemannian spaces of nonconstant curvature. Moreover, we will show that the
new potential V˜ can be interpreted as either an (intrinsic) oscillator or a KC potential on the
corresponding curved manifold. In this way, by starting from the Euclidean Fradkin tensor [8],
ackel
formerly studied by Demkov in [9], and the Laplace–Runge–Lenz (LRL) N -vector, the St¨
transform provides for each case its curved analogue (see [10, 11, 12] and references therein).
In particular, we show in Section 3 that if HU is chosen to be the harmonic oscillator we
˜ is endowed with a curved Fradkin
obtain two different final MS Hamiltonians, for which H
tensor; these are a KC system on a hyperbolic space of nonconstant curvature and the so-called

Darboux III oscillator [13, 14, 15]. In Section 4 we take HU as the (flat) KC Hamiltonian and
the St¨
ackel transform leads to other two different MS systems together with their curved LRL
N -vector; both of them are interpreted as intrinsic oscillators on curved Riemannian manifolds.
Surprisingly enough, one of them is the N D generalization of the Taub-NUT oscillator [16, 17,
18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23]. We stress that for some systems the dimension N = 2 is rather special as
the underlying manifold remains flat, meanwhile for N ≥ 3 such systems are defined on proper
curved spaces (see Sections 3.1 and 4.1). This is similar to what happens in the classifications
of 2D and 3D integrable systems on spaces of constant curvature (including the flat Euclidean
one) [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31] which exhibit some differences according to the dimension
and, in general, the 3D case is usually the cornerstone for the generalization of a given system
to arbitrary dimension.
As a byproduct of this construction, the “growth” of the Fradkin tensor and the LRL vector
from their Euclidean “seeds” to their curved counterparts can be highlighted from a global perspective. These results are comprised in Table 1 in the last section. Furthermore we also present
in Table 2 the MS quantization for all of the above systems together with their “additional”
quantum Fradkin/LRL symmetries.

Superintegrable Oscillator and Kepler Systems on Spaces of Nonconstant Curvature

2


3

Harmonic oscillator and Kepler potentials on Euclidean space

In order to fix a suitable common framework, we briefly recall the well-known basics of the
superintegrability properties of the Hamiltonians describing free motion, harmonic oscillator
and KC potentials on the N D Euclidean space EN .
ackel procedure we consider the one defining
As the “initial” Hamiltonian H (1.1) for the St¨
the geodesic motion on EN plus a relevant constant α:
H=

1 2
p + α.
2

(2.1)

Obviously this is a MS system, and there are many possibilities to choose its integrals of motion.

We shall make use, throughout the paper, of the following results.
Proposition 1.
(i) The Hamiltonian (2.1) is endowed with the following constants of motion.
• (2N − 3) angular momentum integrals (m = 2, . . . , N ):
X
X
(qi pj − qj pi )2 ,
S(m) =
S (m) =
1≤i0:

r ∈ (0, ∞);

η 0, being the case with η < 0 a different physical oscillator potential.
The symmetry properties for Hη are summarized in
Proposition 7.
(i) The Hamiltonian Hη (4.5) characterizes two intrinsic oscillator potentials on the corresponding Riemannian space of nonconstant curvature (4.6) according to (4.7).
(ii) Hη is endowed with the (2N − 3) angular momentum integrals (2.2) together with the
components of the curved LRL N -vector given by (i = 1, . . . , N ):
S˜i =


N
X
k=1

qi
pk (qk pi − qi pk ) + η

|q|

such that

N
X
i=1

S˜i2 = 2L2 (Hη − α) + η 2 Hη2 .

(iii) The set {Hη , S (m) , S(m) , S˜i } (m = 2, . . . , N and a fixed index i) is formed by 2N − 1
functionally independent functions.

Superintegrable Oscillator and Kepler Systems on Spaces of Nonconstant Curvature

11

Table 1. Maximally superintegrable classical oscillator and KC Hamiltonians in N dimensions.
• Geodesic motion on Euclidean space
H=

S

(m)

=

X

1
2

p2 + α

∗ Common (2N − 3) angular momentum integrals of motion
X
(qi pj − qj pi )2 , S(m) =
(qi pj − qj pi )2 , S (N ) = S(N ) ≡ L2

1≤i

Dokumen yang terkait

AN ALIS IS YU RID IS PUT USAN BE B AS DAL AM P E RKAR A TIND AK P IDA NA P E NY E RTA AN M E L AK U K A N P R AK T IK K E DO K T E RA N YA NG M E N G A K IB ATK AN M ATINYA P AS IE N ( PUT USA N N O MOR: 9 0/PID.B /2011/ PN.MD O)

0 82 16

ANALISIS FAKTOR YANGMEMPENGARUHI FERTILITAS PASANGAN USIA SUBUR DI DESA SEMBORO KECAMATAN SEMBORO KABUPATEN JEMBER TAHUN 2011

2 53 20

EFEKTIVITAS PENDIDIKAN KESEHATAN TENTANG PERTOLONGAN PERTAMA PADA KECELAKAAN (P3K) TERHADAP SIKAP MASYARAKAT DALAM PENANGANAN KORBAN KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS (Studi Di Wilayah RT 05 RW 04 Kelurahan Sukun Kota Malang)

45 393 31

FAKTOR – FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PENYERAPAN TENAGA KERJA INDUSTRI PENGOLAHAN BESAR DAN MENENGAH PADA TINGKAT KABUPATEN / KOTA DI JAWA TIMUR TAHUN 2006 - 2011

1 35 26

A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON “SPA: REGAIN BALANCE OF YOUR INNER AND OUTER BEAUTY” IN THE JAKARTA POST ON 4 MARCH 2011

9 161 13

Pengaruh kualitas aktiva produktif dan non performing financing terhadap return on asset perbankan syariah (Studi Pada 3 Bank Umum Syariah Tahun 2011 – 2014)

6 101 0

Pengaruh pemahaman fiqh muamalat mahasiswa terhadap keputusan membeli produk fashion palsu (study pada mahasiswa angkatan 2011 & 2012 prodi muamalat fakultas syariah dan hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta)

0 22 0

Pendidikan Agama Islam Untuk Kelas 3 SD Kelas 3 Suyanto Suyoto 2011

4 108 178

ANALISIS NOTA KESEPAHAMAN ANTARA BANK INDONESIA, POLRI, DAN KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 2011 SEBAGAI MEKANISME PERCEPATAN PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PERBANKAN KHUSUSNYA BANK INDONESIA SEBAGAI PIHAK PELAPOR

1 17 40

KOORDINASI OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN (OJK) DENGAN LEMBAGA PENJAMIN SIMPANAN (LPS) DAN BANK INDONESIA (BI) DALAM UPAYA PENANGANAN BANK BERMASALAH BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG RI NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN

3 32 52