Pengaruh Konseling saat Antenatal Care terhadap Pengetahuan Ibu Hamil tentang Tanda Bahaya Kehamilan di Kecamatan Beringin Kabupaten Deli Serdang Tahun 2014
Lampiran 1. PERNYATAAN KESEDIAAN MENJADI RESPONDEN
Yang bertandatangan dibawah ini: Nama : …………………………………………………. Umur : …………………………………………………. Alamat : ………………………………………………….
Setelah mendapatkan penjelasan tentang penelitian ini maka saya menyatakan bersedia berpartisipasi menjadi subjek dalam penelitian yang akan dilakukan oleh saudari Raisha Octavariny “Pengaruh Konseling Saat Antenatal Care terhadap
Pengetahuan Ibu Hamil tentang Tanda Bahaya Kehamilan di Kecamatan
Beringin Kabupaten Deli Serdang Tahun 2014”.Saya menyadari sepenuhnya bahwa penelitian ini sangat bermanfaat untuk kepentingan ilmiah dan upaya untuk mendukung Program Keselamatan Ibu Hamil Indentitas responden digunakan hanya untuk keperluan penelitian dan akan dijaga kerahasiaannya.
Demikian pernyataan ini dibuat dengan sukarela tanpa ada paksaan dari pihak manapun agar dapat dipergunakan sesuai keperluan.
Medan, ………… 2014 Peneliti
Raisha Octavariny
Lampiran 2. KUESIONER PENELITIAN
PENGARUH KONSELING SAAT ANTENATAL CARE TERHADAP
PENGETAHUAN IBU HAMIL TENTANG TANDA BAHAYA KEHAMILAN
DI KECAMATAN BERINGIN KABUPATEN
DELI SERDANG TAHUN 2014No. Responden : Pendidikan : Alamat : Umur : Pekerjaan : No Tanda Bahaya Ceklist Bahaya Tindakan
1. Perdarahan pervaginam pada kehamilan dibawah 20 minggu
2. Mual muntah yang berlebihan
3. Pusing, kelelahan, wajah kemerahan dan mimisan
4. Perdarahan pervaginam pada kehamilan diatas 20 minggu
5. Sakit kepala yang berat
6. Penglihatan Kabur
7. Bengkak di kaki, tangan dan wajah
8. Keluar cairan pervaginam pada kehamilan lanjut
9. Gerakan janin tidak terasa
10. Nyeri abdomen yang hebat
11. Lemah, capai, terengah-engah, kulit pucat, jantung berdebar lebih kencang.
Lampiran 3. Master Data Penelitian
Lampiran 4.
ANALISIS UNIVARIAT
Kelompok Konseling Statisticsumur (tahun) N Valid
36 Missing Mean
2.14 Median
2.00 Variance .180
Umur Responden (tahun)
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 15-19
1
2.8
2.8
2.8 20-24
29
80.6
80.6
83.3 25-29
6
16.7 16.7 100.0 Total 36 100.0 100.0
Statistics pendidikan
N Valid
36 Missing Mean
3.19 Median
3.00 Variance .961
Pendidikan
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SD
2
5.6
5.6
5.6 SMP
4
11.1
11.1
16.7 SMA/SMK
19
52.8
52.8
69.4 D III
7
19.4
19.4
88.9 S1
4
11.1 11.1 100.0 Total 36 100.0 100.0
Pekerjaan
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid
IRT
14
38.9
38.9
38.9 Kar
7
19.4
19.4
58.3 pet
9
25.0
25.0
83.3 wir
6
16.7 16.7 100.0 Total 36 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid buruk
27
75.0
75.0
75.0 baik
9
25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 36 100.0 100.0
Kelompok Tidak Konseling Statistics
umur (tahun) N Valid
36 Missing Mean
2.08 Median
2.00 Variance .193
Umur Responden (tahun)
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 15-19
2
5.6
5.6
5.6 20-24
29
80.6
80.6
86.1 25-29
5
13.9 13.9 100.0 Total 36 100.0 100.0
Statistics
pendidikan N Valid
36 Missing Mean
2.86 Median
3.00 Variance .180
Pendidikan Total Kategorik
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SMP
6
16.7
16.7
16.7 SMA/SMK
29
80.6
80.6
97.2 D III
1
2.8 2.8 100.0 Total 36 100.0 100.0
pekerjaan responden
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid
IRT 23 63,9 63,9 63,9 Karyawan 1 2,8 2,8 66,7 Petani 7 19,4 19,4 86,1 Wiraswasta 5 13,9 13,9 100,0 Total 36 100,0 100,0
Pengetahuan
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Buruk
31
86.1
86.1
86.1 Baik
5
13.9 13.9 100.0 Total 36 100.0 100.0
ANALISIS BIVARIAT Perbedaan Umur Ibu Hamil yang Konseling dengan yang Tidak Konseling T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean N Std.
Deviation Std. Error
Mean Pair 1 umur responden (tahun) konseling
22,44 36 1,963 ,327 umur responden (tahun) tidak konseling
22,25 36 1,826 ,304
Paired Samples Correlations N Correlation Sig.
Pair 1 umur responden (tahun) konseling & umur responden (tahun) tidak konseling 36 -,143 ,404
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences T dfSig. (2-tailed) Mean Std. Deviation Std.
Error Mean 95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference Lower Upper Pair 1 umur responden (tahun) konseling
35 ,687 Perbedaan Pendidikan Ibu Hamil yang Konseling dengan yang Tidak Konseling Case Processing Summary
- umur responden (tahun) tidak konseling ,194 2,867 ,478 -,776 1,164 ,407
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent pendidikan * pelaksanaan konseling 72 100.0% .0% 72 100.0%
Kepatuhan konseling Total tidak konseling konseling pendidikan rendah Count
1 1.000 Continuity Correction
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) Exact Sig.
(2-sided) Exact Sig.
(1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .000
a
b
36.0
.000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .000 1 1.000 Fisher's Exact Test
1.000 .623 Linear-by-Linear Association
.000 1 1.000 N of Valid Cases
b
72
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,00.
72.0 % within pendidikan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within konseling 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
36.0
6
30
6
12 Expected Count
6.0
6.0
12.0 % within pendidikan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within konseling 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% % of Total 8.3% 8.3% 16.7% tinggi Count
30
60 Expected Count
72 Expected Count
30.0
30.0
60.0 % within pendidikan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within konseling 83.3% 83.3% 83.3% % of Total 41.7% 41.7% 83.3%
Total Count
36
36
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Perbedaan Pekerjaan Ibu Hamil yang Konseling dengan yang Tidak Konseling Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent pekerjaan * pelaksanaan 72 100.0% .0% 72 100.0% konseling
Kepatuhan Konseling tidak konseling konseling Total pekerjaan Bekerja Count
13
22
35 Expected Count
17.5
17.5
35.0 % within pekerjaan 37.1% 62.9% 100.0% % within konseling 36.1% 61.1% 48.6% % of Total 18.1% 30.6% 48.6% tidak bekerja Count
23
14
37 Expected Count
18.5
18.5
37.0 % within pekerjaan 62.2% 37.8% 100.0% % within konseling 63.9% 38.9% 51.4% % of Total 31.9% 19.4% 51.4%
Total Count
36
36
72 Expected Count
36.0
36.0
72.0 % within pekerjaan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within konseling 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.Value Df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4.503 1 .034 Continuity
b 3.558
1 .059 Correction Likelihood Ratio 4.552 1 .033 Fisher's Exact Test
.059 .029
b
N of Valid Cases
72
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Hubungan Umur, pendidikan dan pekerjaan terhadap Pengetahuan Ibu Hamil yang Mendapatkan Konseling
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent umur responden (tahun) 36 100.0% .0% 36 100.0%
- pengk pendidikan * pengk 36 100.0% .0% 36 100.0% pekerjaan * pengk 36 100.0% .0% 36 100.0%
umur * pengetahuan responden konseling Crosstabulation
pengetahuan responden konseling buruk baik Total umur11 <20 Count
1
1 Expected Count .7 .3
1.0 % within umur11 100.0% .0% 100.0% % within pengetahuan
3.8% .0% 2.8% responden konseling % of Total 2.8% .0% 2.8%
>=20 Count
25
10
35 Expected Count
25.3
9.7
35.0 % within umur11 71.4% 28.6% 100.0% % within pengetahuan
96.2% 100.0% 97.2% responden konseling % of Total 69.4% 27.8% 97.2%
Total Count
26
10
36 Expected Count
26.0
10.0
36.0 % within umur11 72.2% 27.8% 100.0% % within pengetahuan
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% responden konseling % of Total 72.2% 27.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .396 1 .529
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .662 1 .416 Fisher's Exact Test
1.000 .722 Linear-by-Linear
.385 1 .535 Association
b
N of Valid Cases
36 a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,28.
Crosstab
a
36.0 % within pendidikan 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% % within pengk 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) Exact Sig.
(2-sided) Exact Sig.
(1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .267
1 .606 Continuity Correction
27.0
b
.000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .286 1 .592 Fisher's Exact Test
1.000 .525 Linear-by-Linear Association
.259 1 .611 N of Valid Cases
b
36
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,50.
9.0
36 Expected Count
pengetahuan Total Buruk Baik pendidikan total kategorik rendah Count
Tinggi Count
5
1
6 Expected Count
4.5
1.5
6.0 % within pendidikan 83.3% 16.7% 100.0% % within pengk 18.5% 11.1% 16.7% % of Total 13.9% 2.8% 16.7%
22
9
8
30 Expected Count
22.5
7.5
30.0 % within pendidikan 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within pengk 81.5% 88.9% 83.3% % of Total 61.1% 22.2% 83.3%
Total Count
27
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Crosstab
Pengetahuan
Buruk Baik Total
pekerjaan bekerja Count
15
7
22 Expected Count
16.5
5.5
22.0 % within pekerjaan 68.2% 31.8% 100.0% % within peng 55.6% 77.8% 61.1% % of Total 41.7% 19.4% 61.1%
Tidak Count
12
2
14 bekerja Expected Count
10.5
3.5
14.0 % within pekerjaan 85.7% 14.3% 100.0% % within pengk 44.4% 22.2% 38.9% % of Total 33.3% 5.6% 38.9%
Total Count
27
9
36 Expected Count
27.0
9.0
36.0 % within pekerjaan
75.0% 25.0% 100.0% kategorik % within pengk1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value Df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.403 1 .236
b
Continuity Correction .623 1 .430 Likelihood Ratio 1.483 1 .223 Fisher's Exact Test
.432 .218 Linear-by-Linear
1.364 1 .243 Association
b
N of Valid Cases
36 a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,50.
Hubungan Umur, pendidikan dan pekerjaan terhadap Pengetahuan Ibu Hamil yang Tidak Mendapatkan Konseling Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent umur responden (tahun) 36 100.0% .0% 36 100.0%
- peng pendidikan * peng 36 100.0% .0% 36 100.0% pekerjaan * peng 36 100.0% .0% 36 100.0%
umur * pengetahuan responden tidak konseling Crosstabulation
pengetahuan responden tidak konseling buruk baik Total umur10 <20 Count
2
2 Expected Count 1.8 .2
2.0 % within umur10 100.0% .0% 100.0% % within pengetahuan responden tidak 6.2% .0% 5.6% konseling % of Total 5.6% .0% 5.6%
>=20 Count
30
4
34 Expected Count
30.2
3.8
34.0 % within umur10 88.2% 11.8% 100.0% % within pengetahuan responden tidak 93.8% 100.0% 94.4% konseling % of Total 83.3% 11.1% 94.4%
Total Count
32
4
36 Expected Count
32.0
4.0
36.0 % within umur10 88.9% 11.1% 100.0% % within pengetahuan responden tidak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% konseling % of Total 88.9% 11.1% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .265 1 .607
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .486 1 .486 Fisher's Exact Test
1.000 .787 Linear-by-Linear
.257 1 .612 Association
b
N of Valid Cases
36
a. 3 cells (75,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,22.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value Df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.161 1 .281
b
Continuity Correction .186 1 .666 Likelihood Ratio 1.978 1 .160 Fisher's Exact Test
.564 .378 Linear-by-Linear
1.129 1 .288 Association
b
N of Valid Cases
36
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,83.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Crosstab
Pengetahuan
Buruk Baik Total
pekerjaan kategorik bekerja Count
10
3
13 kontrol Expected Count
11.2
1.8
13.0 % within pekerjaan
76.9% 23.1% 100.0% kategorik kontrol % within pengk0 32.3% 60.0% 36.1% % of Total 27.8% 8.3% 36.1%
Tidak Count
21
2
23 bekerja Expected Count
19.8
3.2
23.0 % within pekerjaan
91.3% 8.7% 100.0% kategorik kontrol % within pengk0 67.7% 40.0% 63.9% % of Total 58.3% 5.6% 63.9%
Total Count
31
5
36 Expected Count
31.0
5.0
36.0 % within pekerjaan
86.1% 13.9% 100.0% kategorik kontrol % within pengk0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 86.1% 13.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value Df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.436 1 .231
b
Continuity Correction .485 1 .486 Likelihood Ratio 1.376 1 .241 Fisher's Exact Test
.328 .239 Linear-by-Linear
1.396 1 .237 Association
b
N of Valid Cases
36
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,81.
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.Value Df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.436 1 .231
b
Continuity Correction .485 1 .486 Likelihood Ratio 1.376 1 .241 Fisher's Exact Test
.328 .239 Linear-by-Linear
1.396 1 .237 Association
b
N of Valid Cases
36
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,81.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Uji T-Test UNTUK PENGETAHUAN TANDA BAHAYA KEHAMILAN
Group Statistics
Pelaksanaan Std. Std. Error Konseling N Mean Deviation Mean
Macam-macam Tanda Konseling
36 5.08 1.977 .329 BahayanKehamilan
Tidak Konseling
36 4.81 1.653 .276 Bahaya Konseling
36 3.75 1.296 .216 Tidak Konseling
36 3.42 .967 .161 Tindakan Konseling
36 5.06 1.999 .333 Tidak Konseling
36 4.81 1.653 .276 Pengetahuan Konseling
36 13.94 5.264 .877 Tidak Konseling
36 13.00 4.140 .690
Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence
Std.
Interval of the Sig. Mean Error Difference (2- Differe Differe
F Sig. t df tailed) nce nce Lower Upper Macam- Equal macam tanda variances 2.162 .146 .647 70 .520 .278 .429 -.579 1.134 bahaya assumed kehamilan Equal variances .647 67.876 .520 .278 .429 -.579 1.135 not assumed bahaya Equal
1.23 variances 2.634 .109 70 .220 .333 .269 -.204 .871
7 assumed Equal variances
1.23 64.770 .221 .333 .269 -.205 .872 not
7 assumed tindakan Equal variances 1.684 .199 .578
70 .565 .250 .432 -.612 1.112 assumed Equal variances
.578 67.613 .565 .250 .432 -.613 1.113 not assumed pengetahuan Equal variances 3.196 .078 .846 70 .400 .944 1.116 -1.282 3.171 assumed Equal variances
.846 66.318 .401 .944 1.116 -1.284 3.173 not assumed