IJIELT, Vol. 3 No. 2 December 2017 THE EFFECT OF USING BIO-POEM STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY IN DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH Rizki Amelia State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia rizki4meliagmail.com Firza Khaira Maulida State Isl
THE EFFECT OF USING BIO-POEM STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’
WRITING ABILITY IN DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH
Rizki Amelia
State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
rizki4melia@gmail.com
Firza Khaira Maulida
State Islamic University Sultan Syarif Kasim of Riau, Indonesia
firzapira@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
The aim of this research was to find out whether there was any significant
effect of using bio-poem strategy on students‟ ability in writing descriptive
paragraph at Mts Darul Falah Salo Kampar Regency. This research was
Experimental Research. The design was quasi-experimental research. The
writer formulated the problems that would be answered by using the
quantitative research. The subject of the research was the second year
students of MTs Darul Falah Salo Kampar Regency academic year
2016/2017. The object of this research was bio poem strategy and their
writing ability on descriptive paragraph. The writer took two classes:
experimental and control. Experiment class was with 17 students, and
control class was with also 17 students. To analyze the data, the writer
adopted independent sample T-test formula by using SPSS 20 version. After
analyzing the data, the writer found that the students‟ writing ability was
taught by using bio-poem strategy at MTs Darul Falah Salo was categorized
into good level. The students‟ writing ability was taught without using biopoem strategy at MTs Darul Falah Salo was categorized into less level.
Writer found that Ha: sig. (2 tailed) 0.05, Ho is Accepted
If probably (sig) < 0.05, Ho is Rejected
According to Pallant (2003: 58)
classes were normally distributed.
If the "Sig" column of either test is
Therefore, the writer used independent
sample T-test.
higher than 0.05, the data are normally
Furthermore in order to know
distributed. From the table IV.15 above,
whether the object writer had the same
the significant value of post-test
variance or not , the writer previously
experimental and control classes were
described the homogenity analysis as
0.077 and 0.200. Because of sig > 0.05
follows:
(0.077> 0.05) and (0.200 > 0.05), the
initial data of experimental and control
Table 6
Test of Homogenity of Variences
Levene
Statistic
.634
df1
df2
1
Based on the table above , the
probability ( sig) was 0.432. It was
higher than 0.05 (0.432> 0.05). It can be
concluded that the data was homogen.
Sig.
32
.432
After knowing that the data were
normally distributed and homogent, the
writer would show the description of
independent sample t-test analysis as
follows:
Table 7
Group Statistic of Post test of Experimental and Control Classess
Group
N
Score Post Test Experimental
Experimental
and Control
Control
Class
Based on the table IV.16, it can
be seen that the total students from each
class was 17. The mean of the
experimental class was 70,24 and the
mean of control class is 54,12. While,
IJIELT, Vol. 3 No. 2 December 2017
Mean
17
70.24
Std.
Deviation
6.359
17
54.12
4.923
Std. Error
Mean
1.542
1.194
standard deviation of experimental class
was 6,395 and standard deviation of
control class was 4,932. Standard error
mean of experimental class was 1,542
and control class was 1,194.
|163
Rizki Amelia, Firza Khaira Maulida - The Effect of Using Bio-Poem Strategy
Table 8
Independent Sample t-test of Post-Test
in Experimental Class and Control Class
Levene's
Test for
Equality
of
Variances
F Sig.
t-test for Equality of Means
T
95%
Confidence
Sig.
Mean Std. Error Interval of
Df
(2the
Difference Difference
tailed)
Difference
Lower Upper
Equal
Score Post variances .634 .432 8.263 32 .000
Test
assumed
Experiment
Equal
and
variances
Control
8.263 30.110 .000
not
Class
assumed
After getting the output of
SPSS analysis, the writer interpreted the
output of independent sample t-test
shows that the t-test result is 8,263 its df
is 32, significant is 0,432, mean
difference is 16,118 its standard error is
1,91 lower difference interval is 12 and
upper difference interval is 20.
Based on Independent T-test
analysis for post-test writing ability on
descriptive
paragraph
score
of
experimental and control group above,
it showed that there is a significant
difference at post test writing ability on
descriptive
paragraph
between
experimental and control group. T-test
result is 8,263, its df is 32, standard
deviation of experimental group is
6,359 and control group 4,923. So, in
the conclusion sig 2-tailed is 0.000, the
2-tailed value is smaller than 0.05
164|
16.118
1.951
12.145 20.091
16.118
1.951
12.135 20.101
a. Hypothesis Testing
Statistically, the hypotheses are
formulated as:
Ho : sig. (2 tailed)>0.05
Ha : sig. (2 tailed)
WRITING ABILITY IN DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH
Rizki Amelia
State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
rizki4melia@gmail.com
Firza Khaira Maulida
State Islamic University Sultan Syarif Kasim of Riau, Indonesia
firzapira@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
The aim of this research was to find out whether there was any significant
effect of using bio-poem strategy on students‟ ability in writing descriptive
paragraph at Mts Darul Falah Salo Kampar Regency. This research was
Experimental Research. The design was quasi-experimental research. The
writer formulated the problems that would be answered by using the
quantitative research. The subject of the research was the second year
students of MTs Darul Falah Salo Kampar Regency academic year
2016/2017. The object of this research was bio poem strategy and their
writing ability on descriptive paragraph. The writer took two classes:
experimental and control. Experiment class was with 17 students, and
control class was with also 17 students. To analyze the data, the writer
adopted independent sample T-test formula by using SPSS 20 version. After
analyzing the data, the writer found that the students‟ writing ability was
taught by using bio-poem strategy at MTs Darul Falah Salo was categorized
into good level. The students‟ writing ability was taught without using biopoem strategy at MTs Darul Falah Salo was categorized into less level.
Writer found that Ha: sig. (2 tailed) 0.05, Ho is Accepted
If probably (sig) < 0.05, Ho is Rejected
According to Pallant (2003: 58)
classes were normally distributed.
If the "Sig" column of either test is
Therefore, the writer used independent
sample T-test.
higher than 0.05, the data are normally
Furthermore in order to know
distributed. From the table IV.15 above,
whether the object writer had the same
the significant value of post-test
variance or not , the writer previously
experimental and control classes were
described the homogenity analysis as
0.077 and 0.200. Because of sig > 0.05
follows:
(0.077> 0.05) and (0.200 > 0.05), the
initial data of experimental and control
Table 6
Test of Homogenity of Variences
Levene
Statistic
.634
df1
df2
1
Based on the table above , the
probability ( sig) was 0.432. It was
higher than 0.05 (0.432> 0.05). It can be
concluded that the data was homogen.
Sig.
32
.432
After knowing that the data were
normally distributed and homogent, the
writer would show the description of
independent sample t-test analysis as
follows:
Table 7
Group Statistic of Post test of Experimental and Control Classess
Group
N
Score Post Test Experimental
Experimental
and Control
Control
Class
Based on the table IV.16, it can
be seen that the total students from each
class was 17. The mean of the
experimental class was 70,24 and the
mean of control class is 54,12. While,
IJIELT, Vol. 3 No. 2 December 2017
Mean
17
70.24
Std.
Deviation
6.359
17
54.12
4.923
Std. Error
Mean
1.542
1.194
standard deviation of experimental class
was 6,395 and standard deviation of
control class was 4,932. Standard error
mean of experimental class was 1,542
and control class was 1,194.
|163
Rizki Amelia, Firza Khaira Maulida - The Effect of Using Bio-Poem Strategy
Table 8
Independent Sample t-test of Post-Test
in Experimental Class and Control Class
Levene's
Test for
Equality
of
Variances
F Sig.
t-test for Equality of Means
T
95%
Confidence
Sig.
Mean Std. Error Interval of
Df
(2the
Difference Difference
tailed)
Difference
Lower Upper
Equal
Score Post variances .634 .432 8.263 32 .000
Test
assumed
Experiment
Equal
and
variances
Control
8.263 30.110 .000
not
Class
assumed
After getting the output of
SPSS analysis, the writer interpreted the
output of independent sample t-test
shows that the t-test result is 8,263 its df
is 32, significant is 0,432, mean
difference is 16,118 its standard error is
1,91 lower difference interval is 12 and
upper difference interval is 20.
Based on Independent T-test
analysis for post-test writing ability on
descriptive
paragraph
score
of
experimental and control group above,
it showed that there is a significant
difference at post test writing ability on
descriptive
paragraph
between
experimental and control group. T-test
result is 8,263, its df is 32, standard
deviation of experimental group is
6,359 and control group 4,923. So, in
the conclusion sig 2-tailed is 0.000, the
2-tailed value is smaller than 0.05
164|
16.118
1.951
12.145 20.091
16.118
1.951
12.135 20.101
a. Hypothesis Testing
Statistically, the hypotheses are
formulated as:
Ho : sig. (2 tailed)>0.05
Ha : sig. (2 tailed)