art. rev 2REZ. 135KB Jun 04 2011 12:08:21 AM
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS
UNIVALENCE FOR INTEGRAL OPERATORS
by
Daniel Breaz, Nicoleta Breaz
Abstract: We study in this paper two integral operators and we determine the conditions for
univalence for these integral operators.
Let A be the class of the functions f, which are analytic in the unit disc
U = {z ∈ C ; z < 1} and f (0) = f ' (0) − 1 = 0 and denote by S the class of univalent
functions.
Teorema 1 [4] If f ∈ S , α ∈ C and α ≤ 1 / 4 then the function:
Gα ( z ) = ∫ [ f ′(t )] dt
α
z
0
is univalent in U.
Teorema 2 [3] If the function g ∈ S , α ∈ C , α ≤ 1 / 4n , then the function defined by
[
]
Gα ,n ( z ) = ∫ f ′(t n ) dt
z
is univalent in U for n ∈ N .
Teorema 3 [2]
Let α , a ∈ C , Re α > 0 and f ∈ A .
If
0
α
*
1− z
2 Re α
zf " ( z )
≤ 1 (∀) z ∈ U
f ' ( z)
Re α
then (∀) β ∈ C , Re β ≥ Reα , the function
z
Fβ ( z ) = β ∫ t β −1 f ' (t )
0
is univalent.
51
1/ β
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS
Teorema 4 [1] If the function g is holomorphic in U and g ( z ) < 1 in U then
(∀)ξ ∈ U and z ∈ U the following inequalities hold:
g (ξ ) − g ( z )
1 − g ( z )g (ξ )
g ' ( z) ≤
the equalities hold in case g ( z ) =
ξ −z
,
1 − zξ
≤
1 − g ( z)
ε (z + t)
1 + tz
1− z
, where ε = 1 and
g (ξ ) − g (0)
1 − g (0)g (ξ )
g (ξ ) =
2
2
Remark 5 [1]
For z = 0, the inequalities (1) are the form:
and
(1)
u < 1.
≤ξ
ξ + g ( 0)
.
1 + g ( 0) ⋅ ξ
Considering g(0) = a and ξ = z ⇒ g ( z ) ≤
z+a
(∀) z ∈ U .
1+ a ⋅ z
Lemma 6 (Schwartz)
If the function g is holomorphic in U, g(0) = 0 and g (z ) ≤ 1 (∀) z ∈ U , then:
g ( z) ≤ z
(∀)z ∈ U and g ' (0) ≤ 1
the equalities hold in case g(z) = z, where =1.
Theorem 7. Let α, , , , complex number with the properties Reδ = a >0, f,g ∈ A
f = z + a 2 z 2 + ... , g = z + b2 z 2 + ...,
f "( z) 1
≤ , (∀) z ∈ U ,
f ' ( z) n
(2)
g" ( z ) 1
≤ , (∀) z ∈ U ,
g ' ( z) n
n + 2a n + 2a 2 a
⋅
αβ ≤
2
n
n
52
(3)
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS
and
+
α
1
Then (∀)γ ∈ C , Re γ ≥ a the function:
β
1
< 1.
[
(4)
] [
]
z
α
β
Dα , β ,γ , n ( z ) = γ ∫ t γ −1 ⋅ f ' (t n ) ⋅ g ' (t n ) dt
0
1/ γ
is univalent (∀)n ∈ N * \ {1} .
Proof: We consider the function:
h( z ) = ∫0 [ f ′(t n )]α [ g ′(t n )] β dt
z
(5)
The function
p( z ) =
αβ
1
⋅
h" ( z )
h' ( z )
(6)
where αβ satisfies the conditions (3).
We obtain:
{
h′′( z )
1 [ f ′(t n )]α ⋅ [ g ′(t n )] β
⋅
=
⋅
p( z ) =
αβ h ′( z ) αβ [ f ′(t n )]α ⋅ [ g ′(t n )] β
1
=
=
αβ
1
⋅
(
α ⋅ n ⋅ z n −1 ⋅ f ′( z n )
)
α −1
}′ =
[ ] + [ f ′( z )]
[ f ′( z )] ⋅ [g ′( z )]
⋅ f ′′( z n ) ⋅ g ′( z n )
n
β
α
α α ⋅ n ⋅ z n −1 ⋅ f ′′( z n )
β n ⋅ z n −1 ⋅ g ′′( z n )
⋅
+
⋅
αβ
αβ
f ′( z n )
g ′( z n )
We respect the conditions (2), (4) and (7) we have:
53
n
n
α
β
(
⋅ β ⋅ n ⋅ z n −1 g ′( z n )
(7)
)
β −1
⋅ g ′′( z n )
=
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS
p( z ) =
≤
≤
α nz n−1 ⋅ f " ( z n ) β nz n−1 ⋅ g" ( z n )
⋅
+
⋅
≤
αβ
αβ
f '(z n )
g'(z n )
α nz n −1 ⋅ f " ( z n )
β n ⋅ z n −1 ⋅ g " ( z n )
⋅
+
⋅
≤
αβ
αβ
f '(z n )
g'(z n )
α
β
f "(z n )
g" ( z n )
n −1
n
z
⋅ n ⋅ z n −1 ⋅
+
⋅
⋅
⋅
≤
α β
f '(z n ) α β
g'(z n )
≤
⋅n⋅
β
1
1 1
1 1
1
+ ⋅n⋅ =
+
< 1.
n α
n α
β
p (0) = 0
By Schwartz lemma we have:
αβ
1
⋅
h" ( z )
h" ( z )
n −1
≤ z
≤ z ⇔
≤ αβ ⋅ z n −1 ⇔
h' ( z )
h' ( z )
1 − z 2a
⇔
a
zh" ( z )
⋅
≤ αβ
h' ( z )
1 − z 2a
⋅
a
n
⋅ z
Let’s the function Q : [0,1] → R, Q( x) =
(8)
1 − x 2a n
⋅x ,x = z .
a
We have
2
n 2a
Q( x) ≤
⋅
, (∀) x ∈ [0,1] .
n + 2 a n + 2a
n
.
Respect the conditions (3) and (8) we obtain:
54
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS
1 − z 2a
a
z ⋅ h" ( z )
⋅
≤ 1.
h' ( z )
In this conditions applying the theorem 3 we obtain:
[
] [
]
z
α
β
Dα , β ,γ , n ( z ) = γ ∫ t γ −1 ⋅ f ' (t n ) ⋅ g ' (t n ) dt
0
1/ γ
is univalent (∀)n ∈ N * \ {1} .
Corollary 8 [5]. Let α , γ ∈ C , Re α = a > 0, g ∈ A
If
g" ( z ) 1
≤
(∀) z ∈ U
g ' ( z) n
and
n + 2 a n + 2a
2 n
then (∀) β ∈ C , Re β ≥ a, the function
γ ≤
[
n / 2a
]
z
γ
G β ,γ ,n ( z ) = β ∫ t β −1 g ' (t n )
0
1/ β
is univalent (∀)n ∈ N * \ {1} .
Theorem 9. Let α, , , complex number, Re δ = c > 0 , and the functions f , g ∈ A
f = z + a 2 z 2 + ... , g = z + b2 z 2 + ..., .
If f and g satisfy the conditions
f "( z)
g" ( z )
UNIVALENCE FOR INTEGRAL OPERATORS
by
Daniel Breaz, Nicoleta Breaz
Abstract: We study in this paper two integral operators and we determine the conditions for
univalence for these integral operators.
Let A be the class of the functions f, which are analytic in the unit disc
U = {z ∈ C ; z < 1} and f (0) = f ' (0) − 1 = 0 and denote by S the class of univalent
functions.
Teorema 1 [4] If f ∈ S , α ∈ C and α ≤ 1 / 4 then the function:
Gα ( z ) = ∫ [ f ′(t )] dt
α
z
0
is univalent in U.
Teorema 2 [3] If the function g ∈ S , α ∈ C , α ≤ 1 / 4n , then the function defined by
[
]
Gα ,n ( z ) = ∫ f ′(t n ) dt
z
is univalent in U for n ∈ N .
Teorema 3 [2]
Let α , a ∈ C , Re α > 0 and f ∈ A .
If
0
α
*
1− z
2 Re α
zf " ( z )
≤ 1 (∀) z ∈ U
f ' ( z)
Re α
then (∀) β ∈ C , Re β ≥ Reα , the function
z
Fβ ( z ) = β ∫ t β −1 f ' (t )
0
is univalent.
51
1/ β
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS
Teorema 4 [1] If the function g is holomorphic in U and g ( z ) < 1 in U then
(∀)ξ ∈ U and z ∈ U the following inequalities hold:
g (ξ ) − g ( z )
1 − g ( z )g (ξ )
g ' ( z) ≤
the equalities hold in case g ( z ) =
ξ −z
,
1 − zξ
≤
1 − g ( z)
ε (z + t)
1 + tz
1− z
, where ε = 1 and
g (ξ ) − g (0)
1 − g (0)g (ξ )
g (ξ ) =
2
2
Remark 5 [1]
For z = 0, the inequalities (1) are the form:
and
(1)
u < 1.
≤ξ
ξ + g ( 0)
.
1 + g ( 0) ⋅ ξ
Considering g(0) = a and ξ = z ⇒ g ( z ) ≤
z+a
(∀) z ∈ U .
1+ a ⋅ z
Lemma 6 (Schwartz)
If the function g is holomorphic in U, g(0) = 0 and g (z ) ≤ 1 (∀) z ∈ U , then:
g ( z) ≤ z
(∀)z ∈ U and g ' (0) ≤ 1
the equalities hold in case g(z) = z, where =1.
Theorem 7. Let α, , , , complex number with the properties Reδ = a >0, f,g ∈ A
f = z + a 2 z 2 + ... , g = z + b2 z 2 + ...,
f "( z) 1
≤ , (∀) z ∈ U ,
f ' ( z) n
(2)
g" ( z ) 1
≤ , (∀) z ∈ U ,
g ' ( z) n
n + 2a n + 2a 2 a
⋅
αβ ≤
2
n
n
52
(3)
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS
and
+
α
1
Then (∀)γ ∈ C , Re γ ≥ a the function:
β
1
< 1.
[
(4)
] [
]
z
α
β
Dα , β ,γ , n ( z ) = γ ∫ t γ −1 ⋅ f ' (t n ) ⋅ g ' (t n ) dt
0
1/ γ
is univalent (∀)n ∈ N * \ {1} .
Proof: We consider the function:
h( z ) = ∫0 [ f ′(t n )]α [ g ′(t n )] β dt
z
(5)
The function
p( z ) =
αβ
1
⋅
h" ( z )
h' ( z )
(6)
where αβ satisfies the conditions (3).
We obtain:
{
h′′( z )
1 [ f ′(t n )]α ⋅ [ g ′(t n )] β
⋅
=
⋅
p( z ) =
αβ h ′( z ) αβ [ f ′(t n )]α ⋅ [ g ′(t n )] β
1
=
=
αβ
1
⋅
(
α ⋅ n ⋅ z n −1 ⋅ f ′( z n )
)
α −1
}′ =
[ ] + [ f ′( z )]
[ f ′( z )] ⋅ [g ′( z )]
⋅ f ′′( z n ) ⋅ g ′( z n )
n
β
α
α α ⋅ n ⋅ z n −1 ⋅ f ′′( z n )
β n ⋅ z n −1 ⋅ g ′′( z n )
⋅
+
⋅
αβ
αβ
f ′( z n )
g ′( z n )
We respect the conditions (2), (4) and (7) we have:
53
n
n
α
β
(
⋅ β ⋅ n ⋅ z n −1 g ′( z n )
(7)
)
β −1
⋅ g ′′( z n )
=
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS
p( z ) =
≤
≤
α nz n−1 ⋅ f " ( z n ) β nz n−1 ⋅ g" ( z n )
⋅
+
⋅
≤
αβ
αβ
f '(z n )
g'(z n )
α nz n −1 ⋅ f " ( z n )
β n ⋅ z n −1 ⋅ g " ( z n )
⋅
+
⋅
≤
αβ
αβ
f '(z n )
g'(z n )
α
β
f "(z n )
g" ( z n )
n −1
n
z
⋅ n ⋅ z n −1 ⋅
+
⋅
⋅
⋅
≤
α β
f '(z n ) α β
g'(z n )
≤
⋅n⋅
β
1
1 1
1 1
1
+ ⋅n⋅ =
+
< 1.
n α
n α
β
p (0) = 0
By Schwartz lemma we have:
αβ
1
⋅
h" ( z )
h" ( z )
n −1
≤ z
≤ z ⇔
≤ αβ ⋅ z n −1 ⇔
h' ( z )
h' ( z )
1 − z 2a
⇔
a
zh" ( z )
⋅
≤ αβ
h' ( z )
1 − z 2a
⋅
a
n
⋅ z
Let’s the function Q : [0,1] → R, Q( x) =
(8)
1 − x 2a n
⋅x ,x = z .
a
We have
2
n 2a
Q( x) ≤
⋅
, (∀) x ∈ [0,1] .
n + 2 a n + 2a
n
.
Respect the conditions (3) and (8) we obtain:
54
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS
1 − z 2a
a
z ⋅ h" ( z )
⋅
≤ 1.
h' ( z )
In this conditions applying the theorem 3 we obtain:
[
] [
]
z
α
β
Dα , β ,γ , n ( z ) = γ ∫ t γ −1 ⋅ f ' (t n ) ⋅ g ' (t n ) dt
0
1/ γ
is univalent (∀)n ∈ N * \ {1} .
Corollary 8 [5]. Let α , γ ∈ C , Re α = a > 0, g ∈ A
If
g" ( z ) 1
≤
(∀) z ∈ U
g ' ( z) n
and
n + 2 a n + 2a
2 n
then (∀) β ∈ C , Re β ≥ a, the function
γ ≤
[
n / 2a
]
z
γ
G β ,γ ,n ( z ) = β ∫ t β −1 g ' (t n )
0
1/ β
is univalent (∀)n ∈ N * \ {1} .
Theorem 9. Let α, , , complex number, Re δ = c > 0 , and the functions f , g ∈ A
f = z + a 2 z 2 + ... , g = z + b2 z 2 + ..., .
If f and g satisfy the conditions
f "( z)
g" ( z )