Students’ Behaviour Data Collection Techniques

The quantitative data were obtained from the questionnaire given to the expert. It was analyzed through descriptive statistics. A Likert Scale was used since it was appropriate for obtaining the judgments and opinion. The statements in the questionnaires were given score weight. The score for the evaluation statements were: 4 : SA, if the respondents strongly agree with the statements. 3 : A, if the respondents agree with the statements. 2 : D, if the respondents disagree with the statements. 1 : SD, if the respondents strongly disagree with the statements. The data, then, was analyzed to find the mean of the score. Mean = total score Number of case After finding the mean, the data were converted into the data conversion with some categorizations. The data conversion was used to describe the results using descriptive analysis. Based on Sugiono 2012 below is the data conversion table. Table 3.6 : Data Conversion Table Mean Score Categorization 3.26 – 4.00 Very good 2.51 – 3.25 Good 1.76 – 2.50 Fair 1.00 – 1.75 Poor The materials are considered appropriate and can be applied if the mean more than 2.51; while if the materials are below 2.51, it cannot be applied yet and need some revisions.

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS

In this chapter, the results of the needs analysis, the process of writing the course grid, designing the first draft, expert’s judgment and revision would be presented. A. Result of the Design Product 1. The Results of the Need Analysis There were two parts of the results of the needs analysis. They were the description of the learners and the description of target needs and learning needs. The results of the needs analysis are described below. a. The Description of the Students’ Age. There were two classes of the first grade in Budi Mulia Dua Sedayu Elementary School. The sample of the research study was 19 students in the academic year 20132014. They were in Kapulaga class. Actually, there were 28 students in this class. However, only 19 students agreed to have the interview. The others ran away when the researcher try to get close to them,. As the sample, there were 11 boys and 8 girls. Their age range was from 6 to 7 years old. The data of the students can be seen in the table below: Table 4.1 : The Description of the Students’ Age Students Gender Age years Boys Girls 19 11 8 6–7 49