CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION
A. The Research Procedure
The research conducted in September 26
th
2016. Before conducting the research, the researcher asked the headmaster and the English teacher for permission at the
school. After getting the permission, the researcher conducted through the
following steps :
1. Determined the subject of the research, namely the students at the eleventh grade of SMAN 1 Ambarawa Pringsewu.
2. Designed the test which was the multiple choice test about conditional sentence type I for each of pre-test and post-test.
3. Determined the sample of the research by using cluster random sampling. 4. Held the try-out test to know the reliability and validity of the test, this test
was given to the students out of research sample, it was XI MIPA 1 5. After getting the valid and reliable items of the tests, the researcher gave
the valid and reliable items of pretest to sample. In this research the sample was XI MIPA 2 as an experimental class and XI MIPA 3 as a
control class. Holding the pre-test is to know the students‟ conditional
sentence mastery before they had treatment. 6. Analyzed the data gotten through the pre-test.
7. The treatment was conducted three times after the researcher gave the pretest to the sample. The researcher did the treatment of common
mistake game to the experimental class.
8. After treatment, the researcher gave post-test to the sample in order to know the students‟ conditional sentence mastery after the treatment.
9. To know the normality and homogeneity result of the data gotten through pretest and posttest, the researcher analyzed the data by using SPSS.
10. Before making the conclusion, the researcher tested the hypothesis. 11. As the last process of the research, the researcher reported the result of the
research.
B. Description of Treatment
InSMAN 1 Ambarawa Pringsewu, the English subject was taught four time a week. This research was conducted in five meetings.They involvedpre-test, three
times treatments and post-test. Each meeting were held on 90 minutes. On September 27
th
and 28
th
, 2016 the researcher gave the try-out pre-test and post-test XI MIPA 1. On October 4
th
, 2016 the researcher administered pre-test in control class XI MIPA 3 and experimental class XI MIPA 2. In the next meeting, the
researcher gave the treatments. The treatments were held in three times, it began on October 4
th
, 2016 until October 18
rd
, 2016. After the treatments, the researcher administered the post-test in control class and experimental class on October 18
th
, 2016. The result of the pre-test and post-test that were in score form were as the
data of the research. In the process of treatments all activities could run well.
1. Description of the First Treatment
On October 4
th
, 2016 the first treatment the students looked nervous. Before doing treatment the researcher greeted the students, prayed together, checked the
attendant list, and gave motivation to make them interested in teaching learning process.
The researcher asked to the students what conditional sentence is. Some students knew conditional sentence but they were still confused. So the researcher gave
explanation what conditional sentence is and reminded them about the formula of it. To make the students easy to understand conditional sentence, in the first
treatment the researcher focused on conditional sentence type I positive, negative, interrogative forms and gavesome examples of sentences in the form
ofconditional sentence type I. The Students are required to understand sentence patterns of conditional sentence type I. Then the researcher explained to the
students what common mistake game itself and divided the students into several groups which consist of 5 students in each group.
In the first treatment, the researcher gave some examples of sentences in conditional sentence type I form to the students, and then the researcher asked the
students to make six groups which each of group consisted of five students. Then researcher gave each group five pieces of paper that contained five sentences. The
researcher gave chance to every member of group to analyze and arrange correctly for one sentence in one minute. After that, the researcher made the discussion
about the result with the student and told how to correct the mistake in the sentences. Group who could correct all mistake was as winner. The students
looked interested in teaching learning process.
Kategori