The interview style questionnaires cross sectional study results
4.1.3 Focus group discussion
Participants are medical officers, medical assistants and nurses in charge of outpatients’ clinic in all intervention clinics in all three districts. The sessions were held separately conducted by researchers of respective districts. Aims of the sessions are to explore the problems that might affect the management of patients thus their outcome and finally to get the opinions regarding ways to improve blood pressure control. The FGD mainly focused on the knowledge of the health care provider regarding the standard and latest management of hypertension according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines CPG. FGD were carried out in all intervention and control clinics among the staff that involved in clinical the management of hypertensive patients who are medical officers, medical assistants, staff nurses and community nurses. The sessions took place in the clinic meeting room during the non busy afternoon for duration of at least 1 hour. From that discussion we found several major problems, 1. Almost all paramedics and nurses admitted that they never used the CPG in management of hypertensive patients as opposed to medical officers. 2. Majority of paramedics and nurses have limited knowledge about hypertensive disease. 3. Majority of paramedics have limited knowledge regarding the range of hypertensive drugs and dosage 4. Almost all staff said they were overloaded with work because lack of staff and as a result they could not give their best in the management of patients. 5. Many medical officers said that their treatment is limited by the availability of latest drugs. 6. Most staff said there lack of structured programmes on management of hypertension in their clinics such as CME.Parts
» Health System Research In Perak 2006 – 2009
» Objective Methodology Results Discussion
» CI 14.7-28.0 to 67.7 CI 59.7-75.6.
» Problem Statement Problem Analysis
» Variables Table 5. Variables definition
» Techniques for Data Collection Pre-Testing
» Plan for Data Analysis and Interpretation Include Dummy Tables
» Results of Evaluation of Safety Device
» Statement of Principal Finding
» Strengths and Weaknesses of the Study
» Strengths and Weakness in Relation to Other Studies Rate of Unsafe Households
» Meaning of the Study Possible Mechanism and Implication for Clinicians Policymakers
» Unanswered Questions and Future Research
» Introduction Objectives Methodology Results Discussion
» Benefits of psychoeducation INTRODUCTION
» Rationale of study INTRODUCTION
» Potential utilisation of research
» Inclusion criteria Sample size and sampling method
» Exclusion criteria Sample size and sampling method
» Data collection tools and techniques
» Socio-demography of caregivers RESULTS
» Socio-demography of schizophrenic patients Knowledge of caregivers on schizophrenia
» Outcome of patients with schizophrenia
» FBISSF scores of caregivers in the intervention group
» FBISSF scores of caregivers in the control group
» Opinions of staff regarding the psychoeducation programme
» Knowledge of caregivers on schizophrenia
» Defaulter rates Comparison with other studies .1 Readmission rates
» Family burden Comparison with other studies .1 Readmission rates
» Feasibility of the psychoeducation programme
» Introduction Objective Methodology Results Discussion
» Ethical Consideration Sampling METHODOLOGY
» Comparison on Change in Asthma Control Based on ACT in the Post Intervention Cohort
» Statement of Principle Findings
» Strengths and Weaknesses in Relation to Other Studies
» Meaning of the Study Possible Mechanisms and Implication for Policy Makers Clinicians
» Introduction Objectives Methodology Results
» Background Problem statement INTRODUCTION
» Sample Size and Sampling Method Sampling
» Methodology Sampling 0 CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION
» Conclusion Recommendations 0 CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION
» Background and problem analysis
» Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria
» Sample Size and sampling method Variables Data collection techniques
» Comparison between hospital and health clinics baseline data
» Problems and Limitations DISCUSSIONS
» Discussions of Results DISCUSSIONS
» Overview of research design Study type
» Ethical considerations Variables Variables
» Data collection techniques METHODOLOGY
» Health seeking practice: choice of health care provider
» Strengths weaknesses of the study
» Comparison with other studies
» Meaning of study implication for policy makers
» Methodology Results Discussion If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» The interview style questionnaires cross sectional study results
» Results of knowledge about hypertensive disease and
» Focus group discussion Phase I
» Pre intervention data collection
» Implementation of Intervention packages
» Post Intervention data Phase III
» DISCUSSION If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Introduction Objective Methodology Results
» Conclusion Recommendations If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Prevalence of Obesity in Perak, Malaysia
» Diet Intervention Interventional Package .1
» Physical Activity Variables Table 1. Variables
» Introduction Objective Methodology If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Results If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» INTRODUCTION If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Pre-intervention Evaluation of the Diabetic Foot Care Education Programme
» Tidak Setuju 2. Tidak pasti 3. Setuju A Latihan
Show more