Socio-demography of schizophrenic patients Knowledge of caregivers on schizophrenia
46.3 SD=11.8 0.060
c Gender Male Female 25 46.3 29 53.7 23 41.8 32 58.2 0.781 Ethnicity Malay Chinese Indian Others 25 46.3 12 22.2 8 14.8 9 16.7 31 56.4 17 30.9 6 10.9 1 1.8 0.340 0.418 0.747 0.019 Marital status Single Married Divorced Widowwidowed 33 61.1 17 31.5 1 1.9 3 5.6 34 61.8 16 29.1 1 1.8 4 7.3 0.904 0.950 0.484 0.980 Household income RM500 RM 500- RM 999 RM 1,000-RM 1,499 RM1,500 No response 7 13.0 11 20.4 4 7.4 1018.5 22 40.7 10 18.1 8 14.5 3 5.5 4 7.3 3054.5 0.626 0.583 0.980 0.142 0.211 Education level No formal education Primary Secondary above 6 11.1 15 27.8 33 61.1 6 10.9 13 23.6 36 65.5 0.785 0.783 0.786 Duration of illness 9 years 10-19 years 20 years 26 48.1 13 24.1 15 27.8 15 28.8 18 34.6 19 36.5 0.040 0.430 0.464 a Data are presented as number percentage. b All statistical analysis were performed using the Chi-square test. c Statistical analyses using the Independent samples T-test. 59 Efective Implementation of a Structured Psychoeducation Programme among Caregivers of Schizophrenia Patients in the Community Similarly, there was no significant improvement in their knowledge when comparing knowledge scores at 3-months and 6-months p=0.208. Table 4 details the overall percentage score of all caregivers for individual questions in the Knowledge Questionnaire Form. From the summarised percentage scores, the particular area of the illness of which patients did not answer correctly can therefore be identified.4.4 Outcome of patients with schizophrenia
Patient outcomes were measured by the rate of readmission and default to follow- up Table 5. The readmission rate in the intervention group was lower compared to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant 5.6 vs. 9.1, p=0.479. However, a significantly higher number of patients in the control group defaulted their follow-up 11.1 vs. 25.5, p=0.032. Table 3. Knowledge scores of caregivers on schizophrenia in intervention and control groups at baseline and 3 6 months audit a Mean Knowledge Scores of Intervention Group Baseline Post-Test P1 b 3 Months P2 c 6 Months P3 d 13.78 15.87 0.001 18.15 0.001 18.65 0.156 Mean Knowledge Scores of Control Group Baseline 3 Months P4 e 6 Months P5 f 13.47 14.33 0.083 14.93 0.208 a Statistical analyses using the paired samples T-test. b Comparison between baseline and immediate post-intervention. c Comparison between immediate and 3-months post-intervention. d Comparison between 3-months and 6-months post-intervention. e Comparison between baseline and 3-months audit. f Comparison between 3- and 6-months audit.Parts
» Health System Research In Perak 2006 – 2009
» Objective Methodology Results Discussion
» CI 14.7-28.0 to 67.7 CI 59.7-75.6.
» Problem Statement Problem Analysis
» Variables Table 5. Variables definition
» Techniques for Data Collection Pre-Testing
» Plan for Data Analysis and Interpretation Include Dummy Tables
» Results of Evaluation of Safety Device
» Statement of Principal Finding
» Strengths and Weaknesses of the Study
» Strengths and Weakness in Relation to Other Studies Rate of Unsafe Households
» Meaning of the Study Possible Mechanism and Implication for Clinicians Policymakers
» Unanswered Questions and Future Research
» Introduction Objectives Methodology Results Discussion
» Benefits of psychoeducation INTRODUCTION
» Rationale of study INTRODUCTION
» Potential utilisation of research
» Inclusion criteria Sample size and sampling method
» Exclusion criteria Sample size and sampling method
» Data collection tools and techniques
» Socio-demography of caregivers RESULTS
» Socio-demography of schizophrenic patients Knowledge of caregivers on schizophrenia
» Outcome of patients with schizophrenia
» FBISSF scores of caregivers in the intervention group
» FBISSF scores of caregivers in the control group
» Opinions of staff regarding the psychoeducation programme
» Knowledge of caregivers on schizophrenia
» Defaulter rates Comparison with other studies .1 Readmission rates
» Family burden Comparison with other studies .1 Readmission rates
» Feasibility of the psychoeducation programme
» Introduction Objective Methodology Results Discussion
» Ethical Consideration Sampling METHODOLOGY
» Comparison on Change in Asthma Control Based on ACT in the Post Intervention Cohort
» Statement of Principle Findings
» Strengths and Weaknesses in Relation to Other Studies
» Meaning of the Study Possible Mechanisms and Implication for Policy Makers Clinicians
» Introduction Objectives Methodology Results
» Background Problem statement INTRODUCTION
» Sample Size and Sampling Method Sampling
» Methodology Sampling 0 CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION
» Conclusion Recommendations 0 CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION
» Background and problem analysis
» Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria
» Sample Size and sampling method Variables Data collection techniques
» Comparison between hospital and health clinics baseline data
» Problems and Limitations DISCUSSIONS
» Discussions of Results DISCUSSIONS
» Overview of research design Study type
» Ethical considerations Variables Variables
» Data collection techniques METHODOLOGY
» Health seeking practice: choice of health care provider
» Strengths weaknesses of the study
» Comparison with other studies
» Meaning of study implication for policy makers
» Methodology Results Discussion If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» The interview style questionnaires cross sectional study results
» Results of knowledge about hypertensive disease and
» Focus group discussion Phase I
» Pre intervention data collection
» Implementation of Intervention packages
» Post Intervention data Phase III
» DISCUSSION If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Introduction Objective Methodology Results
» Conclusion Recommendations If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Prevalence of Obesity in Perak, Malaysia
» Diet Intervention Interventional Package .1
» Physical Activity Variables Table 1. Variables
» Introduction Objective Methodology If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Results If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» INTRODUCTION If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Pre-intervention Evaluation of the Diabetic Foot Care Education Programme
» Tidak Setuju 2. Tidak pasti 3. Setuju A Latihan
Show more