Meaning of the Study Possible Mechanisms and Implication for Policy Makers Clinicians

113 Improving Asthma Care in Ministry of Health Primary Care Clinics

6.0 CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATIONS

This study has shown that only one third of the asthmatics were controlled at baseline. The overall rate of asthmatic control for those patients who complete the intervention improved from 39.7 95 CI 35 – 44 to 52.9 95 CI 49-57. Furthermore proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma reduced from 25.6 95 CI 22- 29 to 13.8 95 CI 11-17. Use of preventer medication increased from 67.5 to 85.9. After the intervention, the asthmatic control among those of Indian ethnicity and those aged 41-50 years has shown a significant degree of improvement. The intervention package used in this study is effective in improving asthma control. Recommendations: 1. Asthma control is poor with only one third of the asthmatics controlled in primary care clinics. There is need to improve the level of control in patients. 2. The intervention package used in this study is effective in improving asthmatic controlled. It was based on the CPG with modification with ACT patient handbook included to provide self empowerment. It is recommended that this intervention package be used to improve asthma control in primary care clinics in Perak and wider. REFERENCES 1. Asthma education and patient monitoring, Canadian medical association 1999. Available from: http:www.cmaj.cacgicontentfull 2. Bateman ED et al.2007. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur Respir J 2008; 31:143-178 3. Buist AS, William MV., Sandra RW, E. Ann Frazier, Arthur D.H. 2006. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Peak Flow versus Symptom Monitoring in Older Adults with Asthma. Am Journal of Resp and crit care med, Vol 174. pp. 1077-1087. 4. CaressA.L,,Luker,K.,Baver,K.,Woodcock,A.2002. Adherence to peak low monitoring. Information provided by meters should be part of self management plan.BMJ. ; 3247346:1157. 5. Cazzoletti L, Marcon A, Janson C, Corsico A, et.al.2007. Asthma Control in Europe: A real-world evaluation based on an international population-based study.J of Allergy Clin. Immuno 1206:1360-1367. 6. Clinical practice guidelines for management of adult asthma. Ministry of Health Malaysia 2002 7. de Marco R, Cazzoletti L, Cerveri I, Corsico A et al. 2005.Are the Asthma Guideline Goals Achieved in Daily Practice? A Population-Based Study on Treatment Adequacy and the Control of Asthma. Int Arch Allergy Immunol;138:225-234. 114 Improving Asthma Care in Ministry of Health Primary Care Clinics 8. Education for a partnership in asthma care: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for diagnosis and management of asthma, National guideline clearinghouse. Available from: http:www.guideline.govsummarysummary.aspx. 9. FitzGerald JM,et al.2006. Asthma control in Canada remains suboptimal: the Reality of Asthma Control TRAC ; study. Can Respir J; 135: 253-259. 10. Gibson PG et al. 2003. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD001117. DOI: 10.100214651858. CD001117. 11. Gibson PG, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ, et al.; 2000. Monitoring the patient with asthma: an evidence-based approach. J Allergy Clin Immunol :106:17.-26. 12. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma- part 2-managing asthma long term. Available from: http:www.Medscape.comviewarticle564654 13. H Ross Anderson prevalence of asthma BMJ 2005:330:1037-1038. 14. ISAAC committee 1998, ‘Worldwide variation in prevalence of systems of asthma’, Lancet, Vol.351, pp.1225-1232. 15. Jones et al. and the British Thoracic Society research Committee 1995. Peak low based asthma self management: a RCT in general practice. Thorax 50:851-857 16. Kosinski et al. March 2009,Comparability of the Asthma Control Test telephone interview administration format with self-administered mail-out mail-back format : Current Medical Research and Opinion, Volume 25, Number 3, pp. 717-72711 17. Matthew AR, Gerald WV.,James TC et al.2008; Formulating an Efective and Eicient Written Asthma Action Plan. Mayo Clin Proc;8311:1263-1270 18. National Asthma Education and prevention Program NAEPP expert panel report 2003, guidelines for diagnosis and management of asthma- selected topics 2002, National Institutes of Health Publications, no.02-5074. 19. National Heart, lung and blood institute. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda Dept of Health and Human services: 1997. NIH pub 97-405. 20. National Institutes of health; National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 1997; Practical Guide for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH pub no 97-4053 21. Primary care based clinics for asthma: http:www.medscape.com viewarticle486668. 22. Peters SP, Jones CA, Haselkorn T, Mink DR, Valacer DJ, Weiss ST, 2007.Real-world Evaluation of Asthma Control and Treatment REACT: Findings from a national Web-based survey Volume 119, Issue 6, Pages 1454-1461. 23. QAP Primary Health Care. Appropriate management of asthma . Ministry of Health Malaysia 2001 24. The 3rd National Health and Morbidity survey 2006. Institute for Public Health National Institute of Health, Malaysia Ministry of Health 2008.