Focus group discussion Phase I
4.2 Phase II
4.2.1 Pre intervention data collection
A total of 300 patients comprised of 117 males 39 and 183 females 61 with their baseline blood pressure taken. They have the mean SBP of 139.87 and DBP of 84.56. Only 132 44 out of the 300 patients have controlled blood pressure.4.2.2 Implementation of Intervention packages
From January the intervention packages are implemented in intervention clinics as follows: 1. The flow chart on the management of hypertension were developed and distributed to the 6 interventions clinics to be displayed in the rooms. 2. First training to the medical officers, paramedics and nurses in each district of intervention clinics involved in clinical management of hypertensive management conducted on 26 th January 2007. Table 4 Table 4. The distribution of healthcare professionals trained in management of hypertension in selected primary health clinics Districts Intervention Clinics Clinics MO MA Nurses Perak Tengah Bota Kiri Kg. Gajah 1 1 2 2 5 1 Manjung Pulau Pangkor Pantai Remis 2 1 3 2 2 3 Kerian Bagan Serai Tanjung Piandang 1 1 2 2 4 2 Total 7 13 17 265 Improving Blood Pressure Controls in Primary Care Settings 3. Intervention during consultation a. Reminder note to the health care professional Appendix D. b. Advice slip to patients were also distributed. c. Stamp on blood pressure reading · Uncontrolled: blood pressure reading highlighted and they were given an advice slip Appendix B. · Appointment date given according to the protocol. 4. Continuous promotional activities which includes seminar for patients and video show during clinic. 5. Second training had been conducted a month later, which was on 23rd February 2007 to the same medical officers and paramedics to refresh them on management of hypertension patient. 6. In the control clinic, the patient had received the usual care from their health care providers. There were no interventions done in the control clinic.4.3 Phase III
Parts
» Health System Research In Perak 2006 – 2009
» Objective Methodology Results Discussion
» CI 14.7-28.0 to 67.7 CI 59.7-75.6.
» Problem Statement Problem Analysis
» Variables Table 5. Variables definition
» Techniques for Data Collection Pre-Testing
» Plan for Data Analysis and Interpretation Include Dummy Tables
» Results of Evaluation of Safety Device
» Statement of Principal Finding
» Strengths and Weaknesses of the Study
» Strengths and Weakness in Relation to Other Studies Rate of Unsafe Households
» Meaning of the Study Possible Mechanism and Implication for Clinicians Policymakers
» Unanswered Questions and Future Research
» Introduction Objectives Methodology Results Discussion
» Benefits of psychoeducation INTRODUCTION
» Rationale of study INTRODUCTION
» Potential utilisation of research
» Inclusion criteria Sample size and sampling method
» Exclusion criteria Sample size and sampling method
» Data collection tools and techniques
» Socio-demography of caregivers RESULTS
» Socio-demography of schizophrenic patients Knowledge of caregivers on schizophrenia
» Outcome of patients with schizophrenia
» FBISSF scores of caregivers in the intervention group
» FBISSF scores of caregivers in the control group
» Opinions of staff regarding the psychoeducation programme
» Knowledge of caregivers on schizophrenia
» Defaulter rates Comparison with other studies .1 Readmission rates
» Family burden Comparison with other studies .1 Readmission rates
» Feasibility of the psychoeducation programme
» Introduction Objective Methodology Results Discussion
» Ethical Consideration Sampling METHODOLOGY
» Comparison on Change in Asthma Control Based on ACT in the Post Intervention Cohort
» Statement of Principle Findings
» Strengths and Weaknesses in Relation to Other Studies
» Meaning of the Study Possible Mechanisms and Implication for Policy Makers Clinicians
» Introduction Objectives Methodology Results
» Background Problem statement INTRODUCTION
» Sample Size and Sampling Method Sampling
» Methodology Sampling 0 CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION
» Conclusion Recommendations 0 CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION
» Background and problem analysis
» Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria
» Sample Size and sampling method Variables Data collection techniques
» Comparison between hospital and health clinics baseline data
» Problems and Limitations DISCUSSIONS
» Discussions of Results DISCUSSIONS
» Overview of research design Study type
» Ethical considerations Variables Variables
» Data collection techniques METHODOLOGY
» Health seeking practice: choice of health care provider
» Strengths weaknesses of the study
» Comparison with other studies
» Meaning of study implication for policy makers
» Methodology Results Discussion If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» The interview style questionnaires cross sectional study results
» Results of knowledge about hypertensive disease and
» Focus group discussion Phase I
» Pre intervention data collection
» Implementation of Intervention packages
» Post Intervention data Phase III
» DISCUSSION If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Introduction Objective Methodology Results
» Conclusion Recommendations If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Prevalence of Obesity in Perak, Malaysia
» Diet Intervention Interventional Package .1
» Physical Activity Variables Table 1. Variables
» Introduction Objective Methodology If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Results If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» INTRODUCTION If you did not seek treatment for your illness,
» Pre-intervention Evaluation of the Diabetic Foot Care Education Programme
» Tidak Setuju 2. Tidak pasti 3. Setuju A Latihan
Show more