1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Method of Scoring Procedure and Method of Scoring

19 2. The students and the teacher together deal with the procedure of portfolio scoring. 3. Discuss the ways how students can reach the goal. 4. Students’ feedback. 5. Implementing portfolio assessment in the classroom 3. Analyzing and reporting 1. Collect the portfolio folder in order to know the score. 2. Analyze all of the variations of the resources and information related to the result of students’ portfolio score. 3. Report the result of assessment. In addition, Masnur Muslich in his book “Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Kontekstual” stated four procedures in portfolio assessment technique such as collecting, organizing, reflecting, and presenting. 37

b. Method of Scoring

Acording to Harvey Daniels and Marilyn Bizar in Teaching the Best Practice Way: Methods That Matter, K-12, portfolio assessment uses the scoring rubrics as a methods of scoring. 38 Scoring rubrics or descriptive summarizations provide another way to summarize performance on checklists and rating scales. A rubric is a set of criteria that provide a description of various levels of students ’ performance and assignment as well as a value to each of the levels. 39 Furthermore, a rubric describes what is to be learned rather than on how to teach. As with all performance assessment, rubrics are based on clear and coherent criteria. 37 Masnur Muclish, KTSP: Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Kontekstual, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2009, cet. ke-6, p. 121. 38 Harvey Daniels and Marilyn Bizar, Teaching the Best Practice Way: Methods That Matter, K-12, Kendall: Stenhouse Publisher, 2005, p. 203. 39 Ronald E. Taylor, Assessment of Exceptional Students: Educational and Psychological Procedures, Boston: PearsonEducation, Inc, 2009, eight edition, p. 140. 20 Peter W. Airasian stated two basic methods of scoring rubrics that are holistic and analytic. 40 Holistic scoring is used to assess the overall performance of a student across all performance criteria. Analytic scoring is used to assess individually each performance criterion stated in the rubric. Each criterion is rated separately using different level of performance. Table 2.3 illustrates analytic scoring for English assessment. 41 Table 2.2. The General Scoring Rubric Score Level of ability Mastery Description 5 Great Evidence of very good understanding on their assignment, able to finish their assessment on time, good performance in portfolio, creative and commits a few mistakes in those rules. 4 Good Evidence of good understanding on their assignment, able to finish their assessment on time, good performance in portfolio, creative and commits some mistakes in those rules. 3 Moderate Evidence of medium understanding on their assignment, able to finish their assessment on time, good performance in portfolio, creative and commits many mistakes in those rules. 2 Limited Evidence of limited understanding on their assignment, 1-2 requirements is not done. 1 More improve Evidence of lack understanding on their assignment, 1-3 requirements are not done. 40 Peter W. Airasian, Classroom Assessment: Concept and Aplications, ....., fifth edition, p. 253. 41 Peter W. Airasian, Classroom Assessment: Concept and Aplications, ....., fifth edition, p. 256. 21

7. Types of Portfolio Assessment

Dokumen yang terkait

Penerapan model pembelajaran direct instruction untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada konsep termokimia

0 2 18

Applying Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Discussion Text. (A Classroom Action Research in the Third Grade of SMA Fatahillah Jakarta)

5 42 142

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement through Reciprocal Teaching Technique at the Second Year of SMPN 21 Bandar Lampung (A Classroom Action Research)

0 5 59

USING PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010

0 2 16

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ROUNDTABLE TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING IN WRITING (A Classroom Action Research of the Second Semester Students of STMIK Duta Bangsa Surakarta in the academic year of 2013/2014).

0 0 1

USING WORD WEBBING TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS' CREATIVITY IN WRITING (An Action Research Conducted at the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 22 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2012/2013).

0 0 15

THE USE OF OREGON READING MODEL TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (Classroom Action Research of the Second Year Students of SMK N 1 Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2014/2015) - Test Repository

0 0 112

The Implementation of Clustering Technique to Improve Students Writing Skill of Recount Text (A Classroom Action Research of the Second Year Students of Mts Al UswahBergas in Academic Year 2015/2016) - Test Repository

0 1 171

THE USE OF INSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRCLE TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE READING ABILITY OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 RAWALO IN COMPREHENDING RECOUNT TEXTS ( A Classroom Action Reasearch)

1 1 14