65
both the teachers and the students’ perception. After gaining much information, the writer set the planning by identifying the goals, selecting topics, and listing general
purposes. Then, the writer specified learning objectives. Afterwards, developing the preliminary form of product was the next step. The writer tried to select
teachinglearning activities and develop the materials based on the goals, topics, and the learning objectives which were formulated in the planning step. The next
step was preliminary field test. In this step, the writer tried to gain some comments and suggestion about the designed materials to some lecturers of English Language
Education Study Program in Sanata Dharma University and the teacher who taught the tenth grade accounting class. They were asked to fill out the questionnaire which
was distributed by the writer. Their comments and suggestions were used as guideline to revise the designed materials to be better. The answers of the closed-
ended questions in the questionnaires showed that the designed materials were good and acceptable. Finally, the main product revision consisted of four units. They
were I’m Sorry, I Understand and Care, Would You Do Something For Me?, and Can I Help You? Each unit consisted of Warming-up Time, Dialogs Practice,
Language in Use, and Role Play Time. The final revision of the designed materials can be seen in Appendix E.
B. Recommendation
In this part, the writer would like to give some recommendations for English teachers of SMK Negeri 1 Yogyakarta and for future writers based on the research
findings. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
66
1. For English Teachers of SMK Negeri 1 Yogyakarta
The materials are good to enhance students’ speaking proficiency. The teachers are suggested to be more creative in applying the role play activities. Then,
the teachers should pay attention to the time allocation and give the students time to prepare. It also suggested for the teachers to use English during the class. It aims
to make the students accustomed to speaking English. 2.
For Future Writers The writer would like to recommend future writers to conduct the need
analysis before developing materials. Future writers may use some other instruments to gather the data about the students’ need. In connection with that,
future writers are hoped to choose suitable learning activities for the students. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
66
REFERENCES
Borg, W. R., Gall, M. D. 1983. Educational research: An introduction 4
th
ed.. New York: Longman, Inc.
Davies, P. 2000. Success in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donough, J. M. C. Christopher. 1993. Material and method in ELT: Applied language studies. Cambridge: Blackwell; p.165
Freeman, D. L. 2000. Techniques and principles in language teaching 2
nd
ed.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gall, M., Gall J., Borg, W. 2007. Educational research: An introduction 8
th
ed.. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Golebiowska, A. 1990. Getting students to talk. New York: Prentice Hall, Inc
Harmer, J. 1998. How to teach English. New York: Longman Group. Harmer, J. 2007. The practice of English language teaching 4
th
ed.. Cambridge: Pearson Longman.
Hawley, R. C. 1975. Value exploration through role playing practical strategies for use in the classroom. New York: Hart Publisher.
Houle, C. O. 1978. The design of education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Hutchinson, T and Waters, A. 1987. English for specific purposes: A learning
centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Joyce, B. and Weil, M. 1986. Models of teaching 3
rd
ed.. New York: Prentice-Hall, Ince
Kemp, J. 1977. Instructional design: A plan for unit and course development. Belmont: Fearon-Pitman Pub
Ladousse, G. P. 1995. Role play: Resource book for the teacher series. New York: Oxford University Press.
67
Lajooe, E. S. and Barimani, S. Contrastive study on learning vocabulary through role-
play and memorization among EFL female learners. Iran: Islamic Azad University
Michael, J. W. 1998. Action research for language teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pekoz, B. 2008. Intergrating grammar for communicative language teaching. United States:
Girne American
University Retrieved
from http:iteslj.orgTechniquesPekoz-Grammar.html on April 11, 2016.
Paulston and Bruder 1976. Teaching English as a Second Language: Teaching and Procedures. Little, Brown and Company.
Schmuck, R. A., and Schmuck, P. A. 1980. Group processes in the classroom 2
nd
ed.. Dubuque, IA: Brown Company Publisher. Wahyudin, D. 2008 A brief comparative on vocational secondary school
curriculumin Indonesia, Malaysia, and Japan. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Wick, M., Pick, M. 1978. Ecological study of learning. New York: Harper and Row.
Widdowson, H. G. 1979. Teaching language as communication. London: Oxford University Press.
68
APPENDICES
69
Appendix A
The Letters of Permission
70
71
72
Appendix B
The Blueprint and Raw Data of Field Notes in Class Observation
73
A. The Blueprint of Field Notes in Class Observation
