E. DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE
The researcher used qualitative research as the research method. In qualitative research, there are five steps to analyze the data according to Schutt
2014; they are: 1 documentation, 2 conceptualization, coding, and categorizing, 3 examining relationship and displaying data, 4 authenticating
conclusion, and 5 reflexivity. The researcher had already had data from the observation and the FGD. Firstly, these data were transformed into written form,
so the researcher had observation sheets and a transcript of the FGD. “Documentation is critical to qualitative research for several reasons: It is
essential for keeping track of what will be a rapidly growing volume of notes, tapes, and documents; it provides a way of developing and outlining the analytic
process; and it encourages ongoing conceptualizing and strategizing about the text.” Schutt, 2014. Therefore, the researcher spent much time in understanding
these data in order to understand and be familiar with these data so the researcher could continue the analysis well. The next step is conceptualization, coding, and
categorization. Conceptualization is needed to deliver comprehensive narrative from the data gathered as well as the understanding of why the data was
important. Schutt 2014 suggested to use matrix a well-designed chart which can help the researcher in coding and categorizing data. After that, the step is
examining relationship and displaying data. According to Schutt 2014, “Examining relationships is the centerpiece of the analytic process, because it
allows the researcher to move from simple description of the people and settings to explanations of why things happened as they did with those people in that
setting.” Furthermore, Schutt 2014 recommended to use matrix again in examining relationships. The matrix would help the researcher to find connection
in the research; the researcher could also be helped in developing ideas about the research. Then, the data analysis was continued with authenticating conclusion.
To authenticate the informants, the researcher had done three steps. First, the researcher checked the credibility. The credibility here meant that how far the
researcher could trust the informants; whether they were capable to give information or not. In this research, the researcher tried to make sure that
informants who joined FGD, also joined the class from the beginning until the end so they really knew about the process happened in the classroom. Second, the
researcher confirmed whether the statements really responding the questions or just spontaneous. To minimalize the chance of spontaneous responses, the
informants were given time to write down their answers before the FGD was started so they had time to think about their answer. The last is to evaluate
whether the presence of the researcher could make any difference. The researcher had joined the class from one semester. It made the informants familiar with the
presence of the researcher. Therefore, it was very unlikely for the informants to be biased during the FGD because of the researcher.
F. RESEARCH PROCEDURE
This part shows how the researcher conducts the research from the beginning until the researcher write this report. The research procedures are listed
as follows: 1. The researcher proposed a research topic to the academic advisor, then it
was accepted. 2. The researcher and the academic advisor decided to choose one class to be
the object of the research. 3. The researcher joined class activities since the first meeting until the end
of the meeting. 4. The researcher made observation reports from every meeting experienced
by the researcher. However, the reports for the data of the study were taken from five meetings only.
5. The researcher had discussion with the proficient lecturer at the end of the meetings to confirm the data gathered.
6. At the end of the semester, the researcher and the class lecturer conducted an FGD together with the students of the EEC especially General
Listening class IB batch 2015. 7. The researcher recorded the FGD and took notes of it.
8. The researcher made the transcript of the recorded conversation of the FGD.
Kategori