Reflection Theory THEORETICAL DESCRIPTION

B. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

In order to analyze the problems, the researcher considers some important things from all the theories stated before. The theories are formulated into two parts, as explained below, in order to help the researcher answers the research questions. The researcher wanted to understand how the proficient lecturer conducted teaching dynamics in the classroom. The researcher expects that the experienced teacher designs class curriculum using the backward design principle. As a result, the researcher needs to consider three aspects: 1 learning goals, 2 class assessments, and 3 materials and strategies. Then, the experienced teacher is expected to conduct the learning process by using cognitive apprenticeship approach. Therefore, there are some aspects need to be considered further according to Collins, et al.,: a. Contents of the learning process which are divided into four parts: domain knowledge, heuristic strategies, control strategies, and learning strategies. b. Methods of the experienced teacher in delivering contents which are divided into six parts: modeling, coaching, scaffolding, articulation, reflection, and exploration. c. The sequence of how the learning process conducted in three parts: global before local, increasing complexity, and increasing diversity. d. The sociology of how the learning process conducted which have four categories: situated learning, community of practice, intrinsic motivation, and exploiting cooperation. However, due to the time constrains, the researcher will only discuss about two aspects: contents and methods. Furthermore, the researcher – who is a preservice teacher as well – wanted to learn from the proficient lecturer about the teaching dynamics to give the preservice teacher pedagogical skills learning. Therefore, the researcher conducted a classroom experienced in a university course. The classroom experienced is completed through one semester. There are some guidelines in conducting classroom experienced based on Borko Putnam and Welch. a. Observation: during the classroom experienced, the researcher records all of the activities happened during the learning process, from the beginning until the end of the learning process in the classroom. b. Mini discourse community: the researcher should have some discussions with the experienced lecturer related to the observation results. c. Reflection: the researcher makes reflections of each meeting that are recorded during the observation. Regarding to the reflections, the researcher will take ABCs reflection from Welch 1999 as the guidance of making reflection. The contents of the reflection will cover emotions of the researcher during observation affect, what the researcher have done, are doing, and will do related to the teaching process behavior, and what lesson the researcher gets during the classroom experienced process cognitive or content. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 28

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter would elaborate six major parts of the methodology. They are research method, research setting, research participants, instruments and data gathering technique, data analysis technique, and research procedure.

A. RESEARCH METHOD

The research method of this study was qualitative research. According to Lichtman 2012 qualitative research is a term which explains about a research to get deep understanding and to make meaning of it. Qualitative research is also possible to be used in educational research . “The educational experiences of people of all ages as well as material that expands our knowledge of these experiences; in schools as well as out, can be the subject matter” Bogdan, 1982. The focus of qualitative research is the understanding of the researcher himherself towards the behaviors from the subjects’ perspective Bogdan, 1982. Therefore, it is important for the researcher to be able to be the key instrument because the researcher should understand the whole situation by experiencing or observing it. The researcher may use notes and recordings as other instruments to help himherself in gathering data. “In addition, mechanically recorded materials are reviewed in their entirety by the researcher with the researcher’s insight being the key instrument for analysis” Bogdan, 1982.