The Result of Questionnaire

53 In the ninth question, 100 of the students agreed that the material covered in the old module is interesting. On the other hand, in the tenth question, 33.33 of the students disagreed that the material has some variation. While 50 of the students agreed and 16.66 of the students strongly agreed that the material has some variation. As the conclusion for the material in the old module, which was stated in the eleventh question, 66.66 students agree and 33.33 of the students strongly agreed that the materials are easy to learn. Questions twelfth and thirteenth were about the topics covered in the old English module. For the twelfth question, 66.66 students disagree while 33.33 of the students agreed that the topics are boring. In the thirteenth question, 16.66 of the student strongly disagreed and 83.33 of the students disagreed that the topics covered are difficult to be learnt. For the last close-ended question, 33.33 of the students agreed and 66.66 of the students strongly agreed that the module has to be developed. As the conclusion, the old English module actually was good; the material and topics covered were easy to be learnt. But then, it needs a development in the variation of the material. It means that if there is a development for the module, the topics can be used again since those topics are easy. For the open-ended questions which try to gather data about students’ opinion can be seen in Appendix B. Besides answering the questionnaire through giving an opinion on the statement available, the students also did MI inventory. The MI inventory is adopted from Amstrong 1994. Below is presented the result from MI inventory 54 which had done by the participants. To be noted, the names in the table are not the real names of the participants. Table 4.5 The Result of MI Inventory No Name Linguis -tic Log – Math Vis - Spatial Bodily - Kinesth Musical Interper -sonal Intraper -sonal 1,8,15,22, 29,36,43,5 2,9,16,2 3,30,37,4 4,51 3,10,17,24 ,3138,45,5 2 4,11,18,25, 32,39,46,53 5,12,19,26,3 3,40,47,54 6,13,20,27,3 4,41,48,55 7,14,21,28,3 5,42,49,56 1 Adinda Oktalia 6 5 5 5 7 4 7 2 Mira Jamila 4 7 6 4 2 7 5 3 Maria Diah A. 6 4 4 4 5 7 6

4 Dian Indri

5 4 5 2 4 3 4 5 Arifin Huda 5 6 3 2 4 3 4 6 Rista Shintia 6 3 4 3 2 4 5 Total 32 29 27 20 24 28 31 The aim of MI inventory above is to find out the strength of students’ intelligences. After finding the strength of students’ intelligences, the writer calculated the students’ answers see Appendix C. By calculating the answers, the writer decided which intelligences will be covered the most in the next developed module.

2. Planning

In planning step, the writer used the data from research and information collection as the basis. There were some steps which should be done in planning step according to Kemp’s instructional design model. After collecting the data from interview, questionnaires, and MI inventory, the writer started to choose the goals objectives, themes topics, and general purposes which may included in the material. 55 a Determining the Learning Goals The goals of designing material were to help the students to have enough speaking skill practices and also help them to use their MI. b Determining the Topics Based on the result of pre-design survey, the materials which are used in the last module are already suitable for the students since it already covers linguistics intelligence. Therefore, the writer chose some topics from the last module. The topics chosen are: 1. Let’s Be Friends 2. Thanks a Million 3. I Always … 4. I Wanna Be… c Determining the Learning objectives Table 4.6 The Objectives of the Topics Unit Topic Specific Instructional Objectives 1. Let’s Be Friends The students are able to: a. read and practice the dialogue. b. answer the comprehension questions. c. do language exercise in form of practicing the expressions. d. ask people’s personal information, exchange their personal information, then report it to the class e. use their logical-mathematical intelligence, linguistic intelligence, intrapersonal, interpersonal and 56 bodily-kinesthetic intelligences. 2. Thanks a Million The students are able to: a. read the poem. b. understand the message delivered through the poem. c. write their own thank-you note. d. develop their linguistic intelligence, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and bodily- kinesthetic intelligences. 3. .I Always … The students are able to: a. use Simple Present correctly to tell their habits. b. exchange their personal information about their daily activities with others. c. develop linguistic intelligence, intrapersonal, interpersonal and bodily-kinesthetic intelligences. 4. I Wanna Be… The students are able to: a. read the poem correctly. b. communicate with others. c. exchange their personal opinion with others. d. use their musical intelligence by singing a song. e. develop linguistic intelligence, musical, intrapersonal, interpersonal and bodily- kinesthetic intelligences.

3. Development of Preliminary Form of the Product

In this section, the materials were designed based on the result of Planning step. The researcher selected the teaching and learning activity that is appropriate to accommodate the students in achieving learning objectives. The teaching learning activities were selected based on the MI theory. The materials themselves were developed from many sources which could support the materials 57 development. The most of the pictures used in the material designed was created by the writer.

4. Preliminary Field Testing

After designing the materials, the researcher did the preliminary field testing by distributing questionnaire for evaluation. This step was conducted to know whether the materials were appropriate and applicable for Level 1 of English Mastery of Titian Foundation. The researcher analyzed the result of the questionnaire after the participants returned the questionnaire to the researcher. The summary of the participants for the evaluation is presented in the following table: Table 4.7 The Description for the Evaluation Groups of respondents Educational Background Teaching Experience Sex S1 S2 S3 1-5 5-10 10 F M Lecturer - 1 - - - 1 1 - English tutor 3 - - 3 - - 2 1 The researcher conducted the evaluation questionnaire which consists of 10 close-ended statements and 5 open-ended questions. In the close-ended questions, the respondents have to choose the scale that indicates the degree of agreement to the statements provided. Hereby the explanation of the degree of agreements: 1 : Strongly disagreevery poor 2 : Disagreepoor 3 : Neutral 4 : Agreegood 5 : Strongly agreevery good 58 The descriptive statistics of the data obtained from the evaluation questionnaires were analyzed and presented in the following table: Table 4.8 The Frequency of the Respondents’ Opinion No. Evaluated Item Degree of Agreement Central Tendency 1 2 3 4 5 N Mean 1 The general instructional objectives are well formulated. - - 2 - 2 4 4 2 The specific instructional objectives are well formulated. - - - 3 1 4 4.25 3 The specific instructional objectives are able to support the attainment general instructional objectives - - 1 1 2 4 4.25 4 The materials match with the goals and objectives. - - 2 2 - 4 3.5 5 The topics are selected properly and well arranged. - - 4 - 4 4 6 The MI are evenly distributed. - - 1 3 - 4 3.75 7 The content of the set of English speaking instructional material using MI is relevant with the students of Level 1 English Mastery or students of 1 st grade of senior high school. - - - 4 - 4 4 8 The activities presented in the set of English speaking materials using MI can facilitate the students to understand the topic being discussed. - - - 4 - 4 4 9 The activities presented in the set of English speaking instructional material can facilitate the students to use their MI. - - - 4 - 4 4 10 Generally, the instructional materials are well elaborated. - - - 3 1 4 4.25