Table 3.4 Sample of Individual Account Mr. Inu Mr. Inu’s  Individual Beliefs
Category Response
Indicator Interpretation
Teacher‟s belief about
hisher status
A8.
Certification
program of
course
influences
my teaching Certified
teacher regulation  influences
teacher  to  do  his  her best
teaching performance.
In relation to teacher‟s background,  not  only
teacher  education  and experience
that influence
teacher‟s works but also teacher
development  which  is admitted  in  the  form
of certification.
Teaching and
learning condition
A9. Personally,
I
enjoy
interacting  with my students...
Even  though  I  have
many  students
with various competences, I
can  find  the
solution
that  is  using  a  middle course.
Heterogeneous of
students‟ competence does not
constrain  successful learner  development
as  long  as  there  is fun interaction.
He  does  not  mind with
the heterogeneous
students‟ competence.  It  is
very
normal phenomenon to face.
The sample of individual belief in Table 3 .4 explains teacher‟s point of view
about  teaching  and  learning  condition.  I  did  not  include  the  questions  and  put  the responses  only  in  order  to  focus  on  the  shared  points.  The  indicator  was  made  by
making  a  summary  of  the  responses  whereas  the  interpretation  was  formulated  by making a general conclusion from the indicator.
3.5.2 Account of Teacher’s Shared Beliefs
After the individual accounts of each informant were finished, I organized the accounts of shared belief by finding similar responses. Shared accounts of this study
were  made  similarly  with  the  individual  beliefs.  They  were  put  into  four  columns.
The  first  column  is  the  category  containing  the  reference  of  the  belief.  The  second column is for the indicator containing my interpretations derived from the responses
related  to  the  category.  The  third  column  contains  catalogue.  It  shows  the  codes  of informan
ts‟  responses  showing  the  beliefs.  The  last  column  is  the  interpretation derived  from  the  indicator.  Table  3.5  shows  the  sample  of
informants‟  shared accounts and the rest can be seen in Appendix 4.
Table 3.5 Sample of
informants‟ shared accounts
Category Indicator
Catalogue Interpretation
Teacher‟s intention
All  informants  view that  teacher‟s  self
intention  supports  the success of teaching.
Inu  Q1-A1  to  Q4- A4
Lilin  Q1-A1 to  Q2- A2
Anggi  Q1-A1  to Q5-A5
Realize
self awareness  about  the
nature  of  teaching.
inner motivation
Teacher‟s  forum involvement
All informants view that teacher‟s forum, such as
seminar,  workshop,  and training  supports  the
success of teaching. Inu Q5-A5 to Q6-A6
Lilin  Q3-A3  to  Q4- A4
Anggi
Q6-A6 to
Q15-A15 Supplement  to  open
mind  and  get  recent information
through teaching forum.
Teacher‟s  belief about  the  nature
of EFL All informants view that
the nature of a language is
a means
of communication.
Inu Q16-A16 Lilin Q11-A11
Anggi Q31-A31 Means
of communication  not  to
get  high  score  in  final examination because it
belongs to compulsory subject.
Table 3.5 represents how shared beliefs are organized. I did not include the responses into  the  table  to  focus  on  the  summary  of  responses  which  are  put  in  the  indicator
part.  Nevertheless,  I  included  the  catalogue  to  ease  checking  where  the  responses were  from.  The  codes  used  in  the  catalogue  consist  of
the  informants‟  initial  and number  of  questions  and  answers.  In  Table  3
.5, column 1, teachers‟ shared beliefs about  intention  are  derived  from  all  informants
,  namely  Mr.  Inu‟s  interview  of
question and answer 1 until question and answer 4, Mrs. Lilin‟s question and answer 1 to 2, and Mrs. Anggi‟s question and answer 1 to 5.  The three informants said that
intention  supports  the  success  of  teaching  thus  it  can  be  interpreted  that  self awareness about pedagogy
leads teachers‟ inner motivation which contributes in the teaching achievement.
3. 6 Trustworthiness
Realizing the trustworthiness  of the  findings,  it is  necessary to  triangulate the data.  Cohen,  et  al.  2007  state  that  triangulation  refers  to  the  use  of  two  or  more
approaches  of  investigation  to  collect  data  in  the  study  of  some  aspects  of  human behavior to give supporting evidence.  Neuman 2000: 124-125 proposes four types
of  triangulation, “i.e.  triangulation  of  measures,  triangulation  of  observers,
triangulation of theory, and triangulation of method. ”
In  this  study,  I  chose  triangulation  of  method  by  taking  multiple  measures  of the  same  phenomena  that  the  focused  aspects  can  be  seen,  i.e.  interview  and
classroom  observation.  The  main  data  that  I  got  from  the  in-depth  interview  were confirmed using a follow-up interview to ensure and convince that my interpretations
were in line with what the informants meant in the interview. Afterwards, I compared the data with the field notes taken from the observations in order to get suitable data.
69
CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
This  chapter  aims  to  present  the  description  and  interpretation  of  the  data qualitatively as a result of data analysis. All data were presented in the form of words
and sentences as a qualitative research study should be. The  data in  this  study  present  two kinds of beliefs  i.e. the individual beliefs
and the shared beliefs of how to develop successful English learners. The individual beliefs  contain  the  description  of  each  of  the  three  informants  while  shared  beliefs
containing  similar  beliefs  between  or  among  the  three  informants.  The  components of the data which are used as the references are classified into schooling, professional
coursework, contextual factor, and classroom practice Borg, 2003.
4.1 Schooling
Beliefs  investigated  in  the  schooling  part  discuss  the  information  about  the teachers‟ cases related to their experience as a learner. Schooling identifies teachers‟
beliefs  about  the  nature  of  a  language,  the  benefit  of  learning  it,  the  constraints  of learning it, and the solution of the constraints. Regarding the nature of a language, all
informants  agree  that  the  nature  of  a  language  is  a  means  of  communication. Language is not regarded as materials to learn as it is a subject but it is purely learnt
to be able to communicate appropriately.
A  language  is  used  for  communication  so  the  emphasis  is  indeed  to understand  and  interact  each  other  hence  practices  should  have  more
portions…Inu, A16. A language is of course a means of communication. Lilin, A11.