commit to user
102
CHAPTER IV THE RESULT OF THE STUDY
The data gained from a research field were analyzed to get the clear conclusion. The steps that were taken were classified as the following steps: 1
data description; 2 test of data analysis prerequisite; 3 hypothesis testing; and 4 discussion. These four steps were classified chronologically and explained
clearly as follows.
A. Data Description
The data presented are the result of the reading test. It includes the mean, mode, median, standard deviation, and frequency distribution then followed by
histogram and polygon. The descriptions of the data are based on the groups analyzed which are divided into eight groups:
1. The data of reading test of the students who were taught using Note-Taking
Pairs technique A
1
2. The data of reading test on the students who were taught by using DR-TA
technique A
2
3. The data of the reading test of the students who have high linguistic
intelligence B
1
. 4.
The data of the reading test of the students who have low linguistic intelligence B
2
commit to user 103
5. The data of reading test of the students or the group having high linguistic
intelligence who were taught by using Note-Taking Pairs technique A
1
B
1
. 6.
The data of reading test of the students or the group having low linguistic intelligence who were taught by using Note-Taking Pairs technique A
1
B
2
7. The data of reading test of the students or the group having high linguistic
intelligence who were taught by using DR-TA technique A
2
B
1
8. The data of reading test of the students or the group having low linguistic
intelligence who were taught by using DR-TA technique A
2
B
2
The data of each group are described as follows. 1.
The data of reading test of the students who were taught using Note-Taking Pairs technique A
1
Descriptive analysis of the data of A
1
shows that the lowest score is 58 and the highest score is 88.The class is 6 and the interval is 5. The mean is
68.33, the mode is 62.83, the median is 66.38 and the standard deviation is 142.28. The frequency of distribution is presented in Table 4.1. and the
histogram and polygon are presented in Figure 4.1.
Table 4.1. Frequency Distribution of A
1
Class limits Class
boundaries Frequency
f
i
Midpoint X
i
f
i
X
i
f
i
X
i 2
55 - 59 54.5 - 59.5
4 57
228.0 51984.00
60 - 64 59.5 - 64.5
8 62
496.0 246016.00
65 - 69 64.5 - 69.5
6 67
402.0 161604.00
70 - 74 69.5 - 74.5
6 72
432.0 186624.00
75 - 79 74.5 - 79.5
2 77
154.0 23716.00
80 - 84 79.5 - 84.5
2 82
164.0 26896.00
85 - 89 84.5 - 89.5
2 87
174.0 30276.00
30 2050.0
727116.00
commit to user 104
Figure 4.1. Histogram and Polygon of Data A
1
2. The data of reading test on the students who were taught by using DR-TA
technique A
2
Descriptive analysis of the data of A
2
shows that the lowest score is 50 and the highest score is 74.The class is 6 and the interval is 4. The mean is
61.37, the mode is 61.72, the median is 61.50 and the standard deviation is 123.51. The frequency of distribution is presented in Table 4.2. and the
histogram and polygon are presented in Figure 4.2.
Table 4.2. Frequency Distribution of A
2
Class limits Class
boundaries Frequency
f
i
Midpoint X
i
f
i
X
i
f
i
X
i 2
48 - 51 47.5 - 51.5
4 49.5
198.0 39204.00
52 - 55 51.5 - 55.5
4 53.5
214.0 45796.00
56 - 59 55.5 - 59.5
3 57.5
172.5 29756.25
60 - 63 59.5 - 63.5
8 61.5
492.0 242064.00
64 - 67 63.5 - 67.5
4 65.5
262.0 68644.00
68 -71 67.5 - 71.5
3 69.5
208.5 43472.25
72 - 75 71.5 - 75.5
4 73.5
294.0 86436.00
30 1841.0
555372.50
2 4
6 8
10 12
54.5 - 59.5 59.5 - 64.5 64.5 - 69.5 69.5 - 74.5 74.5 - 79.5 79.5 - 84.5 84.5 - 89.5
fr e
q u
e n
cy
class boundaries
A1
commit to user 105
Figure 4.2. Histogram and Polygon of Data A
2
3. The data of the reading test of the students who have high linguistic
intelligence B
1
. Descriptive analysis of the data of B
1
shows that the lowest score is 50 and the highest score is 88.The class is 6 and the interval is 6. The mean is
67.30, the mode is 65.00, the median is 65.86 and the standard deviation is 156.25.
Table 4.3. Frequency Distribution of B
1
Class limits Class
boundaries Frequency
f
i
Midpoint X
i
f
i
X
i
f
i
X
i 2
50 - 55 49.5 - 55.5
3 52.5
157.5 24806.25
56 - 61 55.5 - 61.5
4 58.5
234.0 54756.00
62 - 67 61.5 - 67.5
11
64.5 709.5
503390.25 68 -73
67.5 - 73.5 6
70.5 423.0
178929.00 74 - 79
73.5 - 79.5 2
76.5 153.0
23409.00 80 - 85
79.5 - 85.5 2
82.5 165.0
27225.00 86 - 91
85.5 - 91.5 2
88.5 177.0
31329.00
30 2019.0
843844.50
2 4
6 8
10 12
47.5 - 51.5 51.5 - 55.5 55.5 - 59.5 59.5 - 63.5 63.5 - 67.5 67.5 - 71.5 71.5 - 75.5
fr e
q u
e n
cy
class boundaries
A2
commit to user 106
The frequency of distribution is presented in Table 4.3. and the histogram and polygon are presented in Figure 4.3.
Figure 4.3. Histogram and Polygon of Data B
1
4. The data of the reading test of the students who have low linguistic
intelligence B
2
Descriptive analysis of the data of B
2
shows that the lowest score is 50 and the highest score is 74.The class is 6 and the interval is 4. The mean is
62.70, the mode is 60.17, the median is 61.79 and the standard deviation is 132.46. The frequency of distribution is presented in Table 4.4. and the
histogram and polygon are presented in Figure 4.4.
Table 4.4. Frequency Distribution of B
2
Class limits Class
boundaries Frequency
f
i
Midpoint X
i
f
i
X
i
f
i
X
i 2
48 - 51 47.5 - 51.5
3 49.5
148.5 22052.25
52 - 55 51.5 - 55.5
2 53.5
107.0 11449.00
56 - 59 55.5 - 59.5
6 57.5
345.0 119025.00
2 4
6 8
10 12
49.5 - 55.5 55.5 - 61.5 61.5 - 67.5 67.5 - 73.5 73.5 - 79.5 79.5 - 85.5 85.5 - 91.5
fr e
q u
e n
cy
class boundaries
B1
commit to user 107
60 - 63 59.5 - 63.5
7 61.5
430.5 185330.25
64 - 67 63.5 - 67.5
2 65.5
131.0 17161.00
68 - 71 67.5 - 71.5
4 69.5
278.0 77284.00
72 - 75 71.5 - 75.5
6 73.5
441.0 194481.00
30 1881.0
626782.50 Figure 4.4. Histogram and Polygon of Data B
2
5. The data of reading test of the students or the group having high linguistic
intelligence who were taught by using Note-Taking Pairs technique A
1
B
1
. Descriptive analysis of the data of A
1
B
1
shows that the lowest score is 62 and the highest score is 88.The class is 5 and the interval is 5. The mean is
72.33, the mode is 66.00, the median is 69.00 and the standard deviation is 107.47.
Table 4.5. Frequency Distribution of A
1
B
1
Class limits Class
boundaries Frequency
f
i
Midpoint X
i
f
i
X
i
f
i
X
i 2
59 - 63 58.5 - 63.5
2 61
122.0 14884.00
64 - 68 63.5 - 68.5
5
66 330.0
108900.00 2
4 6
8 10
12
47.5 - 51.5 51.5 - 55.5 55.5 - 59.5 59.5 - 63.5 63.5 - 67.5 67.5 - 71.5 71.5 - 75.5
fr e
q u
e n
cy
class boundaries
B2
commit to user 108
69 - 73 68.5 - 73.5
2 71
142.0 20164.00
74 - 78 73.5 - 78.5
2 76
152.0 23104.00
79 - 83 78.5 - 83.5
1 81
81.0 6561.00
84 - 88 83.5 - 88.5
3 86
258.0 66564.00
15 1085.0
240177.00
The frequency of distribution is presented in Table 4.5. and the histogram and
polygon are presented in Figure 4.5.
Figure 4.5. Histogram and Polygon of Data A
1
B
1
6. The data of reading test of the students or the group having low linguistic
intelligence who were taught by using Note-Taking Pairs technique A
1
B
2
Descriptive analysis of the data of A
1
B
2
shows that the lowest score is 58 and the highest score is 74.The class is 5 and the interval is 3. The mean is
63.80, the mode is 60.00, the median is 61.60 and the standard deviation is 101.64. The frequency of distribution is presented in Table 4.6. and the
histogram and polygon are presented in Figure 4.6.
1 2
3 4
5 6
58.5 - 63.5 63.5 - 68.5 68.5 - 73.5 73.5 - 78.5 78.5 - 83.5 83.5 - 88.5
fr e
q u
e n
cy
class boundaries
A1B1
commit to user 109
Table 4.6. Frequency Distribution of A
1
B
2
Class limits Class
boundaries Frequency
f
i
Midpoint X
i
f
i
X
i
f
i
X
i 2
57 - 59 56.5 - 59.5
4 58
232.0 53824.00
60 - 62 59.5 - 62.5
5 61
305.0 93025.00
63 - 65 62.5 - 65.5
64 0.0
0.00 66 - 68
65.5 - 68.5 2
67 134.0
17956.00 69 - 71
68.5 - 71.5 2
70 140.0
19600.00 72 - 74
71.5 - 74.5 2
73 146.0
21316.00
15 957.0
205721.00 Figure 4.6. Histogram and Polygon of Data A
1
B
2
7. The data of reading test of the students or the group having high linguistic
intelligence who were taught by using DR-TA technique A
2
B
1
Descriptive analysis of the data of A
2
B
1
shows that the lowest score is 50 and the highest score is 70.The class is 5 and the interval is 4. The mean is
61.63, the mode is 62.50, the median is 61.90 and the standard deviation is 99.56. The frequency of distribution is presented in Table 4.7. and the
histogram and polygon are presented in Figure 4.7.
1 2
3 4
5 6
56.5 - 59.5 59.5 - 62.5 62.5 - 65.5 65.5 - 68.5 68.5 - 71.5 71.5 - 74.5
fr e
q u
e n
cy
class boundaries
A1B2
commit to user 110
Table 4.7. Frequency Distribution of A
2
B
1
Class limits Class
boundaries Frequency
f
i
Midpoint X
i
f
i
X
i
f
i
X
i 2
50 - 53 49.5 - 53.5
1 51.5
51.5 2652.25
54 - 57 53.5 - 57.5
2 55.5
111.0 12321.00
58 - 61 57.5 - 61.5
4 59.5
238.0 56644.00
62 - 65 61.5 - 65.5
5 63.5
317.5 100806.25
66 - 69 65.5 - 69.5
2 67.5
135.0 18225.00
70 - 73 69.5 - 73.5
1 71.5
71.5 5112.25
15 924.5
195760.75 Figure 4.7. Histogram and Polygon of Data A
2
B
1
8. The data of reading test of the students or the group having low linguistic
intelligence who were taught by using DR-TA technique A
2
B
2
Descriptive analysis of the data of A
2
B
2
shows that the lowest score is 50 and the highest score is 74.The class is 5 and the interval is 5. The mean is
61.00, the mode is 76.50, the median is 67.13 and the standard deviation is 92.52. The frequency of distribution is presented in Table 4.8. and the
histogram and polygon are presented in Figure 4.8.
1 2
3 4
5 6
49.5 - 53.5 53.5 - 57.5 57.5 - 61.5 61.5 - 65.5 65.5 - 69.5 69.5 - 73.5
fr e
q u
e n
cy
class boundaries
A2B1
commit to user 111
Table 4.8. Frequency Distribution of A
2
B
2
Class limits Class
boundaries Frequency
f
i
Midpoint X
i
f
i
X
i
f
i
X
i 2
47 - 51 46.5 - 51.5
3 49
147.0 21609.00
52 - 56 51.5 - 56.5
3 54
162.0 26244.00
57 - 61 56.5 - 61.5
3 59
177.0 31329.00
62 - 66 61.5 - 66.5
1 64
64.0 4096.00
67 - 71 66.5 - 71.5
1 69
69.0 4761.00
72 - 76 71.5 - 76.5
4 74
296.0 87616.00
15 915.0
175655.00 Figure 4.8. Histogram and Polygon of Data A
2
B
2
B. Test of Data Analysis Prerequisite
Kategori