Review of Related Studies

In order to see the class struggle in the novel, the writer of this thesis analyzes the characters in the novel and then classifies into the two main classes namely proletariat and the capitalist. After that the writer analyzes the oppression done by the capitalist towards the proletarian. On his thesis, the writer applies theory on character and characterization, theory of Marxism that includes theory of social class, theory of oppression, theory of alienation, theory of class consciousness and theory of class struggle to analyze the problems mentioned above. Through the analysis, the writer finds that there are two main classes in capitalist society; they are capitalist and the proletariat. The former is the capitalist while the latter is the proletarian. The writer discovers that the capitalist oppresses the proletarian to get benefit for their own sake. The class struggle then is done when the proletarian start to realize that they are being used by the capitalist. However, before the class struggle, the proletarian encounter some phases. The first phase is the alienation as the result of oppression, after that class consciousness when they realize that they as one united class are being tortured by another class. The last phase is the class struggle when the proletarian as an oppressed class feel that they are facing the same enemy and they think they have to struggle against the oppressor together. In the end the idea of Marxism can be seen through the struggle of the proletarian against the capitalist who bluntly oppress them Pratama, 2009: 70-73. Yohanes Tuaderu on his thesis entitled “Class Struggle in Capitalist Society as Depicted in George Bernard Shaw‟s Pygmalion” states that class struggle occurs when the interest of the two classes are no longer the same. In other word, when the capitalist prioritizes their interest more than the working class including ignoring the welfare of the working class and the human aspects of the workers Tuaderu, 2008: 140. There are two aims in this thesis, they are to reveal the social condition in capitalist society and to find how the character‟s reaction toward the social condition as the portrait of the class struggle. From the analysis, it can be seen that there are practices of class distinction and human exploitation in industry sphere in the society in England by the end of nineteenth century till the early twentieth century. Meanwhile, the class struggle which is done by the main character of Pygmalion is the portrait of the working class that is trying to free themselves from the poverty and gain the own rights. Another thesis entitled “Jerry‟s “Class Struggle in Edward Albee‟s The Zoo Story ”. In his thesis, the writer tries to see the class struggle through an absurd play. According to the writer, the play itself plays its role as a literary critic toward economy, political, and social life Kristanto, 2010: 7. The aims of the study are to analyze the social conditions in the play and how the characters behave. This thesis uses Marxist theory and sociological approach to examine the class struggle. From the analysis, the writer finds that social disparity cannot be separated from our lives and the disparity between the upper class and lower class is clearly depicted in the play. The writer finds that the gap between the two classes is too wide. The upper class who owns a lot of wealth becoming much richer but they have no empathy towards the lower class. In the study, it is concluded that Jerry, as the representation of the lower class, tries to get Peter‟s attention because he wants to be equal to him. Meaning to say, Jerry wants to omit the class distinction in the society so that he can be free from the alienation. In the end, Jerry succeeds in achieving his dream but it takes his own life to get it. Second finding, is that Peter, who comes from the upper class, tends to control his position. By answering Jerry‟s questions reluctantly, he shows that they are in a different position and his reluctance to share the bench symbolizes his willingness to keep his social status Kristanto, 2010: 60-62. This research will develop other studies mentioned above but unlike the previous studies that have been mentioned before, this research will try to analyze the same problem in a different literary work by using the same approach. This research focuses on how the unequal treatment performed by the upper class shows how the power is maintained by the upper class thus will result the struggle among the class.

B. Review of Related Theories

1. Theory of Character

Character is always included as one of the elements of a story. Mostly through characters, the author can deliver the idea of the story. In A Glossary of Literary Terms characters are defined as the persons presented in literary work equipped with moral, dispositional, and emotional qualities that are expressed in what they say through the dialogue and by what they do through the action. Abrams, 1985: 23. What the characters say and do need to be understood in order to do the analysis of the characters in a literary work.

2. Theory of Characterization

The way the author presents the character in the story is known as characterization. Perrine’s Literature: Structure, Sound and Sense proposes two ways the authors often uses to present their characters Arp and Johnson, 2009: 162. The first way is direct presentation where the author will present the characters explicitly through the exposition or analysis, the description of the characters, or through another character in the story that describes them. Through the indirect presentation, the author will let the readers interpret the characters through their actions in the story. The readers will determine what the characters are like by what they say or do in the story. According to Murphy there are nine ways of an author revealing the characterization to the readers. Those nine ways are described as follow.

1. Personal Description

The character is being described by the author, for example the author can describe the character‟s appearance through his body or clothes. 2. Character as seen by another The author describes the character using the point of view or the opinion of other character. 3. Speech The author describes the character through what he or she says. The readers can see the characteristics of the character whenever that one character speaks, or in the conversation with another, or giving his opinion.

4. Past life

The author gives clue to events that helped to shape the characteristics of the character. It is done by direct comment by the author himself, through the person‟s thought, through the conversation or meeting with another person. 5. Conversation of others The characteristic of the person can be revealed through the conversation of other person. The things that other persons say about that one person often give the clues about that person‟s characteristics. 6. Reactions The author lets the readers know or see how the person reacts to a various situation or events because the readers can see the person‟s attitude through his or her reaction. 7. Direct comment The person‟s characteristics are being described or commented directly by the author. 8. Thoughts The author freely presents the direct knowledge of what the person is thinking about and the readers are in a privileged position for knowing the thought of the person. 9. Mannerism The author describes a person‟s mannerism, habits or peculiarity that might reveal something about the person‟s characteristics to the readers. 1972: 161-172