Kajian Pustaka, Kerangka Pemikiran Dan Hipotesis 31

BAB II Kajian Pustaka, Kerangka Pemikiran Dan Hipotesis 33

2.3.1.3 Indikator Kualitas Informasi

Adapun dimensi kualitas infor masi menurut James O’Brien 2004:261 adalah sebagai berikut: 1. Time Dimension a. Timelines Information should be provided when it is needed. b. Currency Information should be up-to date when it is provided. c. Fruquency Information should be provided as often as needed. d. Time Period Information can be provided about past, present, and future time periods. 2. Content Dimension a. Accuracy Information should be free from errors. b. Relevance Information should be related to the information needs of a specific recipient for a specific situation. c. Completeness All the information that is needed should be provided. d. Conciseness Only the information that is needed should be provided. e. Scope Information can have a broad or narrow scope, or an internal or external focus. f. Performance Information can reveal performance by measuring activities accomplished, progress made, or resources accumulated. 3. Form Dimension a. Clarity Information should be provided in a form that is easy to understand. b. Detail Information can be provided in detail or summary form. c. Order Information can be arranged in predetermined sequence. d. Presentation Information can be presented in narrative, numeric, graphic, or other forms. e. Media Information can be provided in the form of printed paper documents, video displays, or other media.

BAB II Kajian Pustaka, Kerangka Pemikiran Dan Hipotesis 34

Adapun karakteristik kualitatif informasi akuntansi menurut Kieso, et al 2010:44-47 adalah sebagai berikut: 1. Relevance Accounting information must be capable of making a difference in a decision. Information with no bearing on a decision is irrelevant. a. Predictive Value Financial information has predictive value as an input to predictive processes used by investors to form their own expectations about the future. b. Confirmatory Value Relevant information also help users confirm or correct prior expectations, it has confirmatory value. 2. Faithful Representation Faithful representation means that the numbers and descriptions match what really existed or happened. Faithful representation is a necessity because most users have neither the time nor the expertise to evaluate the factual content of the information. a. Completeness Completeness means that all the information that is necessary for faithful representation is provided. An omission can cause information to be false or misleading and thus not to be helpful to the users of financial reports. b. Neutrality Neutrality means that a company cannot select information to favor one set of interested parties over another. c. Free from Error An information item that is free from error will be a more accurate faithful representation. 3. Enhancing Qualities Enhancing qualitative characteristics are complementary to the fundamental qualitative characteristics. These characteristics distinguish more-useful information from less-useful information. a. Comparability Information that is measured and reported in a similar manner for different companies is considered comparable. Comparability enables users to identify the real similiarities and differences in economic events between companies. b. Verifiability Verifiability occurs when independent measures, using the same methods, obtain similar results.

Dokumen yang terkait

Pengaruh Partisipasi Pengguna Terhadap Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Dan Implikasinya Pada Kualitas Informasi (Studi Pada KPP Pratama Bandung Di Wilayah Kanwil Jawa Barat)

0 17 153

Pengaruh Partisipasi Pengguna terhadap Sistem Informasi Akuntansi dan Implikasinya pada Kualitas Informasi Akuntansi (Survei pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Kota Bandung)

7 27 49

Pengaruh stuktur organisasi terhadap sistem informasi akuntansi dan implikasinya pada kualitas informasi : (survey pada 10 KPP Kanwil Jawa Barat I)

4 31 67

Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Dan Kualitas Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Kualitas Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (Survey Pada Koperasi di Kota Bandung)

3 19 1

Pengaruh Struktur Organisasi Terhadap Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Dan Implikasinya Pada Kualitas Informasi (Survey Pada KPP Di Kanwil Jawa Barat 1)

1 14 74

pengaruh Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Implementasi Sistem Informasi Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Dan Implikasinya Terhadap KInerja Pegawai (Survey Pada KPP Pratama Di Wilayah Bandung)

0 29 26

Pengaruh Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Kualitas Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Dan Implikasinya Pada Kualitas Informasi Akuntansi (Survey pada UMKM Sentra Industri Sepatu Cibaduyut Bandung Jawa Barat)

0 8 1

Pengaruh Struktur Organisasi Terhadap Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Dan Implikasinya Pada Pengendalian Internal (Survey Pada 10 KPP Bandung Kanwil Jawa Barat I)

8 131 88

pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Dan kemampuan Pengguna Terhadap Kualitas Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (survey pada KPP Pratama di Wilayah Kabupaten Bandung)

3 13 50

Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Struktur Organisasi terhadap Kualitas Sistem Informasi Akuntansi serta Implikasinya pada Kualitas Informamasi Akuntansi (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bandung).

9 48 119