68 are 65. It implies that their initial ability is similar. However, the experimental
group got two points higher than the control groups.
4.5.2. Post-test Analysis
In this section, I will describe about the students post-test score from the three raters after getting treatment. The first one is the post-test score of the
experimental group. Then, the post-test of control group using Songs and the last is the post-test of the control group using Fidel Charts.
4.5.2.1. Experimental Group’s Post-test Analysis
The first one is the post-test score of the experimental group after getting treatment using Audio Lingual Method. The post-test mean score of the
experimental group, 77, and the mean score increased by ten points from 67 to 77 after getting treatment; it is considered as good ability students. Here is the post-
test data of experimental group.
Table 4.5 Post-test Score of Experimental Group
No Students’ Code
Score Average
Rater 1 Rater 2
Rater 3
1 E-01
91 92
91 92
2 E-02
83 85
84 84
3 E-03
78 80
79 79
4 E-04
86 87
87 86
5 E-05
83 85
84 84
6 E-06
73 75
73 74
7 E-07
75 77
76 76
8 E-08
68 70
69 69
9 E-09
78 80
79 79
10 E-10
83 84
83 84
11 E-11
63 65
64 64
12 E-12
87 87
87 87
69
13 E-13
79 81
80 80
14 E-14
80 82
81 81
15 E-15
65 65
66 65
16 E-16
81 83
83 82
17 E-17
57 60
59 59
18 E-18
76 78
77 77
19 E-19
79 80
79 79
20 E-20
75 77
76 76
21 E-21
79 80
79 79
22 E-22
75 77
76 76
23 E-23
79 81
80 80
24 E-24
76 78
77 77
25 E-25
79 80
80 80
26 E-26
71 73
72 72
27 E-27
71 72
72 72
28 E-28
68 69
69 69
29 E-29
62 64
63 63
30 E-30
71 73
72 72
31 E-31
71 71
72 71
32 E-32
84 84
85 84
Mean 77
These post-test score can be classified into three groups. They are poor ability, average ability and the good ability. In the pre-test twenty seven students
are included into the students of average ability, and the others are considered having good pronunciation ability. However, there are some differences in the
post-test compared to the pre-test. In the pre-test, there is no students considered in the poor ability level, but in the post-test, only one student that is considered
has poor pronunciation ability. Next is the average ability. There are twenty seven students included in
this level before. However, in the post-test we can find only six students included in this ability, and the others is included in the good ability pronunciation. In the
pre-test, the higher score is 82 and the lowest score is 60. Meanwhile in the post- test we can find 59 as the lowest score and 92 as the highest score.
70 Based on the explanation above, it is reasonable to say there is significant
improvement in the experimental group‟s pronunciation ability after getting treatment using Audio Lingual Method.
4.5.2.2 Control Group using Songs’ Post-test Analysis
