87
ALM : 3.14
Songs :
2.97 Fidel Charts
: 2.93
Charts. After knowing the mean rank of each group, we can see the Kruskal- Wallis test in the table 4.17.
Table 4. 17
b. Grouping Variable: Method
Based on the computation of table 4.17 above, we can see that the Asymp. Sig. of the three group is 0.017. It means that there is a significant differences or
improvement because the Asymp. Sig. is 0.017 is less than 0.05. This score implies that there are differences of motivation of the experimental and control
groups. Audio Lingual Method group or experimental group got the highest motivation score. The overall result of post-test motivation questionnaire score
will be presented below:
Figure. 4.8. Overall Result of Post-test Motivation Questionnaire
Test Statistics
a,b
Motivation Chi
- square
8.207 D
f 2
Asymp. Sig. .017
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
88 The motivation score of the experimental group is 3.14, Songs group is
2.97, and the Fidel Charts group is 2.93. Based on the data of questionnaire above implies that Audio Lingual Method use in the experimental group is more
interesting than the other method. It is because the experimental group got higher motivation score compared to the other treatment.
89
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
This chapter dealt with the conclusion drawn from the study that had been conducted and some suggestions related to the study and English language
teaching in the future.
5.1 Conclusion
The first question of this study is whether ALM improves st udents‟ accuracy in
pronouncing or not. Based on the results of data interpretation on the previous chapter, I came to conclusions that the use of Audio-Lingual Method in teaching
pronunciation imp roves the students‟ accuracy in pronunciation. This method is
also more effective than the other method using songs and Fidel Charts as media. The data showed that the mean score of the students of experimental group who