Control Group using Songs

62 the previous chapter, the students of experimental group are considered as the students of average ability. From the data of the first rater, we can classify the students into three groups. They are poor ability, average ability and good ability. One student is included in poor ability, twenty-eight students are included in average ability and the others are included in good ability. The highest score from the first rater is 82 and the lowest score is 59. From the second rater, we can classify the students into two groups. They are average ability group and good ability. There are twenty-four students are included in average ability and the others are included in good ability. The highest score from the second rater is 83 and the lowest score is 61. Meanwhile, from the third rater data, we can classify the students‟ ability into two groups too. They are average ability and good ability group. From the third rater, there are twenty- seven students from the average ability group and five students from the good ability group. The highest score from this rater is 82 and the lowest one is 61.

4.5.1.2 Control Group using Songs

The pre- test mean score of control group using songs, 65, shows that the students‟ initial ability is included into the average ability students. Four students are considered having poor ability in pronunciation, nineteen students are considered having average ability in pronunciation, and the others are considered having good ability in pronunciation. 63 Table 4.3 Pre-test Score of Control Group using Songs. No Students’ Code Score Average Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 1 C1-01 63 63 61 62 2 C1-02 76 77 75 76 3 C1-03 63 64 62 63 4 C1-04 73 73 72 73 5 C1-05 73 75 73 74 6 C1-06 71 72 70 71 7 C1-07 52 53 54 53 8 C1-08 55 56 55 55 9 C1-09 65 66 65 65 10 C1-10 63 64 63 63 11 C1-11 71 72 71 71 12 C1-12 71 72 70 71 13 C1-13 65 67 65 66 14 C1-14 73 75 73 74 15 C1-15 63 64 63 63 16 C1-16 57 58 56 57 17 C1-17 63 64 63 63 18 C1-18 73 75 73 74 19 C1-19 63 64 63 63 20 C1-20 65 67 65 66 21 C1-21 60 61 60 60 22 C1-22 73 74 73 73 23 C1-23 63 64 63 63 24 C1-24 55 53 57 55 25 C1-25 65 67 65 66 26 C1-26 60 61 60 60 27 C1-27 63 63 64 63 28 C1-28 70 71 67 69 29 C1-29 65 66 65 65 Mean 65 From the data above, we can see that the average score of the three raters for control group using songs is 65. This score implies that the students of the control group using songs are included into the average ability. From the first rater, we can classify the students score into three groups. They are poor pronunciation ability, average pronunciation ability and good pronunciation 64 ability. Based on the data above, there are four students who are considered having poor pronunciation ability, nineteen students for average pronunciation ability and six students for good pronunciation ability. The highest score from the first rater is 76 and the lowest score is 52. From the second rater, we can classify the students‟ ability into three groups. They are poor pronunciation ability, average pronunciation ability and good pronunciation ability. The data above shows us there are four students included into poor ability group, sixteen students for average ability group and nine students that are included into good ability students. The highest score from this rater is 77 and the lowest score of this group is 53. Same with the first and the second rater, we can classify the students‟ ability into three groups too. They are poor ability, average ability and good ability. In the poor ability group, we can find four students are included into this group, twenty students for average ability score and five students for good ability group. Meanwhile, the highest score from the third rater is 75 and the lowest score is 54. Overall, based on the mean score of the average score from the three raters we can see that students‟ scores are varied. The highest score, 76, is included into good ability students, and the lowest score, 53, is included into poor ability students 65

4.5.1.3 Control Group using Fidel Charts

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PICTURE BOOKS IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP PGRI Ciputat)

1 18 147

ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATIC REPRESENTATION ABILITY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING

0 0 12

TEACHING WRITING THROUGH STORY MAP TO THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF STATE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3 OF PALEMBANG Yuspar Uzer Universitas PGRI Palembang ABSTRACT - View of Teaching Writing Through Story Map to the Eighth Grade Students of State Junior High Schoo

0 0 10

DISCOVERY LEARNING IN TEACHING REPORT WRITING FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

0 0 23

View of THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ASSERTIVE TRAINING TECHNIQUE TO ENHANCE THE SELF-CONFIDENCE OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN KARANGANYAR REGENCY

0 0 14

THE TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS OF READING COMPREHENSION TO STUDENTS WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENT (A Descriptive Research at the Seventh and Eighth Grade of SMP YKAB Surakarta in 20122013Academic Year)

0 0 56

THE USE OF ANIMATED FILM IN TEACHING STUDENTS WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT (A Pre-Experimental Study to the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 4 Singkawang in Academic Year 20172018) AN ARTICLE By:

0 0 9

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECT METHOD IN TEACHING READING AT THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 1 OF PALANGKA RAYA THESIS Presented to the Department of Eduaction of the State Islamic College of Palangka Raya in Partial of the Requirement For the D

0 0 24

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PRE-QUESTIONING TECHNIQUE TO TEACH READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT (An Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Student at SMP N 2 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 20172018) By: AGHITA OKTAVIANA

0 1 14

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING A1 SpeechTRON AS A MEDIUM TO TEACH PRONUNCIATION OF –ed ENDING REGULAR VERBS IN THE NARRATIVE TEXTS (An Experimental Research at The Tenth Graders of SMA Unggulan Nurul Islami Semarang In The Academic Year Of 20112012)

0 2 107