Daftar Pustaka

Daftar Pustaka

(RIMPAC) 2014. Indonesia bersama dengan beberapa negara lainnya telah mendemonstrasikan

Alisyahbana, S. T. (1987). Bumantara – The pengalaman operasional yang berharga khususnya

Integration of Southeast Asia and its kemampuan pendaratan amfibi dalam latihan

Perspectives in the Future. Jakarta: Center multinasional tersebut. Hal ini diperlukan bagi

of Southeast Asian or Bumantara Studies. Indonesia karena perdagangan maritim dan

Alonso, M. D., & Levine, P. (2007). Arms Trade kegiatan terkait lainnya tergantung pada kehadiran and Arms Races: A Strategic Analysis. In angkatan laut untuk perjalanan yang aman dari T. Sandler, & K. Hartley, Handbook of kapal dagang. Pada saat ini hal tersebut merupakan Defense Economics. UK: North-Holland. perhatian dari hukum internasional seperti

UNCLOS dan pembentukan sistem kerja sama Andaya, L. Y. (2011). Eastern Indonesia: A Study keamanan maritim regional, bukan dominasi dari

of the Intersection of Global, Regional, satu kekuatan angkatan laut tunggal (Etzold,

and Local Network in the Extended Indian 1980). Hal ini seperti yang dinyatakan di dalam

Ocean. In S.C. Smith, Reinterpreting pembukaan konstitusi Indonesia yaitu untuk

Indian Ocean Worlds. Cambridge: menjaga perdamaian dan ketertiban dunia yang

Cambridge Scholars Publishing. berdasarkan kemerdekaan, perdamaian abadi dan

Anh, N. T. (1996). IndoTiongkok and the Malay keadilan sosial. World: A Glimpse on the Malay- Vietnamese Relations to the Mid-Nineteen

Kesimpulan

Century. Asia Journal, Vol. 3. No. 1. Gambaran sejarah maritim dalam tulisan

Antaranews. (2011). RI, South Korea strengthen ini memberikan pemahaman bagi kita mengenai

defense cooperation . Di akses Oktober warisan dan budaya maritim Indonesia sebagai 2016, dari http://www.antaranews.com/ dasar bagi poros maritim Indonesia. Sementara

en/news/75508/ri-south-korea-strengthen- perspektif ekonomi pertahanan memberikan

defense-cooperation

gambaran tantangan dan prospek di dalam domain maritim terkait pada politik, pertahanan, dan

Asada, S. (2006). From Mahan to Pearl Harbor: ekonomi guna mewujudkan poros maritim

The Imperial Japanede Navy and the Indonesia tersebut. Berdasarkan kedua perspektif

United States. Maryland: Naval Institute tersebut, Indonesia dalam visi poros maritim perlu

Press.

merumuskan keseimbangan baru berdasarkan saling pengertian dan kerja sama multilateral

Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, Volume 18 No. 3 Tahun 2016

Asch, B.J., Hosek, J.R., & Warner, J.T. (2007). Dombrowski, P. (2002). The Globalization of the New Economics Of Manpower In The

Defense Sector? Naval Industrial Cases Post-Cold War Era. In T. Sandler, & K.

and Issues. In S.J. Tangredi, Globalization Hartley, Handbook of Defense Economics.

and Maritime Power. Washington: NDU UK: North-Holland.

Press publications.

Booth, K. (1977). Navies and Foreign Policy. Dunne, J., Smith, R., & Willenbockel, D. (2005). London: Croom Helm.

Models of Military expenditure and Growth: A Critical Review. Defence and

Brauer, J. (2007). Arms Industries, Arms Trade, Peace Economics, Vol. 16, No. 6,, 449- and Developing Countries. In T. Sandler,

& K. Hartley, Handbook of Defense Economics. UK: North-Holland.

Etzold, T. (1980). Is Mahan Still Valid? United .

Button, R. (2008). Small Ships in Theater Security States Naval Institute Proceedings Cooperation. US: RAND Corporation.

Flecker, M. (2007). The South Tiongkok Sea Tradition: the Hybrid Hulls of South-East

Chan, S. (1987). Military Expenditures and Asia. International Journal of Nautical Economic Performance. World Military Archaeology. Vol.36. No.1. Expenditures and Arms Transfers.

Frederick, W.H. (2011). Historical setting. In W. Cho, H. (2006). Siamese-Korean Relations in the

H. Frederick, & R. L. Worden, Indonesia Late Fourteenth Century. Journal of the

a Country Study. Washington: Federal Siam Society. No. 94. Research Division Library of Congress.

Cho, Y. (2015). The Small But Magnificent Friedman, T.L. (1999). The Lexus and the Olive Counter-Piracy Operation of the Republic Tree. New York: Anchor. of Korea. In M. H. Nordquist, Freedom of

Navigation and Globalization. Netherlands: Gomez, L. R. (1967). Sri Yijava and Madjapahit. Koninklijke Brill NV.

Philippine Studies Vol.15. No.1. Corbett, J. (1988). Some Principles of Maritime

Goucher, C., LeGuin, C., & Walton, L. (1998). Strategy. Annapolis: United States Naval

Trade, Transport, Temples, and Tribute: Institute Press.

The Economics of Power. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Deger, S. (1986). Economic Development and Defence Expenditure. Economic Development

Hattendorf, J.B. (2003). The Uses of Maritime and Cultural Change, Vol. 35 , 179-196.

History in and for the Navy. Naval War College Review. Vol. LVI.

Dellios, R., & Ferguson, R. (2015). Thinking Through Srivijaya: Polycentric Networks

Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, in Traditional Southeast Asia. Isanet.

J. (1999). Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford: Stanford

Dinarto, D. (2016, Mei). Indonesia’s ‘Global Maritime Fulcrum’: The Case of Abu University Press.

Sayyaf . Di akses Oktober 2016, dari Heng, D.T. (2006). Export commodity and http://thediplomat.com/2016/05/indonesia

regional currency: The role of Chinese s-global-maritime-fulcrum-the-case-of-

copper coins in the Melaka straits, tenth to abu-sayyaf/

fourteenth centuries. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. No.37.

Djumala, D. (2015, Februari). Diplomacy for maritime fulcrum . Di akses oktober 2016,

Holmes, J.R. (2014). Strategic Features Of The dari http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/

South Tiongkok Sea: A Tough Neighborhood 2015/02/09/diplomacy-maritime-fulcrum.

For Hegemons. Naval War College html

Review. Vol. 67. No. 2.

Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, Volume 18 No. 3 Tahun 2016

Hu, N.-T. A., & Oliver, J.K. (1995). A Framework Quirk, S., & Bradford, J. (2015, Oktober). The for Small Navy Theory. Naval War

Global Maritime Fulcrum and the US- College Review 1978-1994. Vol. 68.

Indonesia Partnership . Di akses Oktober 2016, dari http://thediplomat.com/2015/

Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation 10/how-the-global-maritime-fulcrum-can- and Discord in the World Political elevate-the-us-indonesia-partnership/ Economy. Princeton : Princeton University

Press. Richards, K. (2005). Classical Naval Strategy and Medium Power Navies. In G. Kerr, The

Liow, J.C., & Shekhar, V. (2014, November). Indonesia as a Maritime Power: Jokowi’s Peter Mitchell Essays 2003. Papers in

Australian Maritime Affairs. Australia: Vision, Strategies, and Obstacles Ahead .

Sea Power Centre.

Di akses

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/indone Roell, P. (2016). Tiongkok’s Maritime Silk Road – sia-as-a-maritime-power-jokowis-vision-

An Ambitious Undertaking: A View from strategies-and-obstacles-ahead/

Europe. Institute for Strategic, Political, Security and Economic Consultancy.

Mahan, A. (1991). The Influence of Sea Power Upon History 1660 –1783. In J. B.

Rowlands, K. (2012). “Decided Preponderance At Hattendorf, Mahan on Naval Strategy.

Sea”: Naval Diplomacy In Strategic Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.

Thought. Naval War College Review. Vol.

65. No.4.

Manggala, P.U. (2013). The Mandala Culture of Anarchy: The Pre-Colonial Southeast

Rubel, R. C. (2015). Connecting The Dots: Capital Asian International Society. Journal of

Ships, The Littoral, Command Of The ASEAN Studies. Vol.1. No.1.

Sea, And The World Order. Naval War College Review. Vol. 68. No. 4.

Miksic, J.N. (2003). Heterogenetic cities in premodern Southeast Asia.

Sandler, T., & Hartley, K. (2007). Defense In A Archaeology. Vol. 32. No.1.

World

Globalized World: An Introduction. In T. Sandler, & K. Hartley, Handbook of

Minh-Hà, P.C. (2012). Asian Shipbuilding Defense Economics. UK: North-Holland. Technology. Bangkok: Asia and Pacific

Regional Bureau for Education-UNESCO Scobell, A., McMahon, M., & Cooper, C.A. Bangkok.

(2015). Tiongkok’s Aircraft Carrier Program: Drivers, Developments, Monteiro, L.N. (2015). Fernando Oliveira’s Art Of Implications.

Naval War College Review. Vol. 68. No. 4. War At Sea (1555): A Pioneering Treatise

On Naval Strategy. Naval War College Sodhy, P. (1983). The "International Relations" Of Review. Vol. 68. No. 4.

The Malay Peninsula From The Seventh To The Fourteenth Century. Akademika

OECD. (2015). Peer Review of the Korean

No. 23.

Shipbuilding Industry and Related Government Policies. Council Working

Stuart-Fox, M. (2003). A short history of Tiongkok Party on Shipbuilding.

and Southeast Asia : tribute, trade and Pirazzoli-

influence. t’Serstevens, M. (2011). The Burnei Australia: Allen & Unwin. Shipwreck: a Witness to the International

Swartz, P. (2011). Rising Powers and Naval Trade in the Tiongkok Sea around 1500.

Power. US: Institute for National Strategic The Silk Road. Vol. 9.

Studies.

Polachek, S.W., & Seiglie, C. (2007). Trade, Tangredi, S. J. (2002). Globalization and Sea Peace And Democracy: An Analysis Of

Power: Overview and Context. In S. J. Dyadic Disputes. In T. Sandler, & K.

Tangredi, Globazliation and Maritime Hartley, Handbook of Defense Economics.

Power. Washington: NDU Press publications. UK: North-Holland.

Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, Volume 18 No. 3 Tahun 2016

Tejo, A. (2014, Mei). Imported Components Wei, Z. (2015). A General Review Of The History Dominate Shipbuilding Industry . Di akses

o f Tiongkok’s Sea-Power Theory Oktober 2016, dari http://en.tempo.co/

Development. Naval War College Review. read/news/2014/05/14/056577719/Importe

Vol. 68. No. 4.

d-Components-Dominate-Shipbuilding- Yakovlev, P. (2007). Arms Trade Military Industry Spending and Economic Growth. Defence

Wade, G. (2009). An Early Age of Commerce in and Peace Economics, Vol. 18, 317-318. Southeast Asia, 900 –1300 CE. Journal of

Yamauchi, S. (2013). The Japanese Archipelago Southeast Asian Studies. Vol.40. No.2. and Maritime Asia from the 9th to the

14th Centuries. In K. Fujita, M. Shiro, &

A. Reid, Offshore Asia: Maritime

Interaction in Eastern Asia before Steamships. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

386

Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, Volume 18 No. 3 Tahun 2016