Forbes Past Approaches to Word Categories

• verb with an enclitic: vkyfwm loutta ‘work’ verb ‘work’ + nominalizing particle, • nouns formed by doubling, with or without a proclitic and rhyming syllables: aumif:aumif: kaun:gaun: ‘good’ verb ‘good’ + verb ‘good’ with voiced onset in close juncture; r\ynfhw\ynfh mapyei tabyei ‘not quite full’ negative prefix m ă-verb ‘full’ + reduced numeral one tă- verb ‘full’; kanlan ‘across’ verb ‘across’ with tone change to match following syllable + ‘road’; eD wdwd ni tidi ‘reddish’ verb ‘red’ + reduplicated rhyming syllable t-t- which copies vowel and tone of the main verb, in close juncture to indicate diminished quality of the verb. The doubled verbs as well as doubled nouns are considered to be noun expressions by Cornyn 1944:31. It could be said that Cornyn’s treatment constituted a further advance toward emic categorization of Burmese word forms, shedding Western constructions deemed necessary for the second language learner. His classifications also incorporated the concept of embeddings from other levels. The word-level forms listed above demonstrate a sense of the categoriality of free forms as a superordinate category incorporating structural properties of both free and bound forms in various combinations. This level he labels Form. A similar breadth of inclusion is demonstrated in his next level of category labeled Expression. Cornyn utilized a kind of tacit hierarchy without actually specifying or discussing how levels relate to each other. This hierarchy has been inferred to have the form of figure 17. Sentence Expression Form Figure 17. Cornyn’s 1944 grammatical hierarchy The Expression unit includes compounds, phrases, and relative clauses—all units marked by postpositional particles that relate information to the wider sentence. The Sentence unit has three types: narrative, imperative, and equational.

3.4.5 Forbes

Forbes 1967:195 recognized two kinds of words, the simple word a minimal free form and the complex or compound word. The work cited here is only about nouns so it is not known how she would distinguish other word classes. Regarding nouns, Forbes noted the way in which simple and complex forms, often labeled phrases, function as nouns in Burmese. Simple nominal words like acG: hkwe ‘dog’, xD hti ‘umbrella’, q|m hca.ra ‘teacher’ function in clear nominal ways. Larger sequences also function as single nominal units, such as vlqdk: lu hcui ‘criminal’, rae.uvmwJhvl mane.ka. la tai. lu ‘the man who came yesterday’, and vla\cmufamuf. lu hkauk yauk. ‘six people’. Forbes’ criterion for distinguishing between the nominal word and phrase is principally phonological. She does not even suggest that ‘the man who came yesterday’ is a relative clause, rather it is a sequence with open juncture. Open versus close juncture is the principle criterion, but consideration is also given to free versus bound, and the type of numeral classifiers taken by the nominal. Her paper focused primarily on describing the various types of combinations of nouns and verbs in the compound noun construction. Each type of compound is systematically described for its structural properties and constraints on combination. Two-member compounds N + N, N + V, V + N with sub-types are classified. It should be noted that Forbes not only judged NN sequences to be compounds but also NV, which some have called an attributive phrase. In addition, the VV sequence can be nominal, though it can also be verbal. The distribution of such compounds within the sentence determines the interpretation of nominal versus verbal. Table 6 lists compound nouns with two members of the compound. Pattern Example Component Meaning Compound Meaning 1 NN enf:vrf: nany: lam: way + road way means \ynfol pyany su country + person citizen 2 NV acG:|L: hkwe: ru: dog + wild mad dog vlif lu ngai person + young youth 3 VN 0ifaiG wang ngwai enter + silver income atmifol aung su victory + person conqueror 4 VV pnf:a0: cany: we: bundle + be far meeting ajumf\im krau ngra shout + shout advertisement Table 6. Two-member compound nouns Forbes also classifies three-member compounds for which it must be noted that the internal structure always consists of two members, N or V. These first combine into a single constituent and subsequently add a third element to the first combination to form the whole three-part compound nominal. The preference of Burmese structure for pairs or doublets is clearly manifest in the three-member compound noun, e.g., NV + NV N first, and then N + N to complete the compound. Table 7 lists the types of three-member compound nouns. Pattern Example Component Meaning Compound Meaning tvfwef:ausmif: a-lai tan: kyaung: middle + grade + school middle school 1. NNN NN a\ryJqD: mre pai: hci: ground + bean oil peanut oil a|aG:tdk: re nwe: ui: water+ hot pot kettle 2. NVN NN a|csdKig: re hkyui nga: water + sweet fish fresh water fish oifwef:cef: sang tan: hkan: study + line class room lecture hall 3. VNN NN oifwef:om: sang tan: sa: study + line son trainee juufa\ceD krak hkre ni chicken + foot cross red red cross 4. NNV NV twGif:a|:r’ a-twang: re: hmu inside + matter regard as important secretary ig:a\cmufajumf nga: hkrauk krau fish + dry fry fried dried fish 5. NVV NV a|aeGjurf: re nwe kram: water + hot harsh plain tea \rifuGif:usf mrang kwang: kyai see + area view wide panoramic view 6. VNV NV tdyf|mcif: ip ra hkang: sleep + place spread out bed sheet Table 7. Three-member compound nouns It should be noted that the pattern of N + V is that of the clausal predication in Burmese. Significantly, this particular structure of nominal compounding demonstrates what we find at the clause and sentence level—that both these structures are nominal units. This supports the present thesis that clause and sentence units in Burmese operate similarly to nominal structures—both conceptually and grammatically. The matter of headedness also arises in these constructions. Forbes noted that immediate constituency does not necessarily follow juncture patterns. The grammatical head of the final nominalization sequence in a three-member compound often has close juncture whereas the first two elements, which are semantically more blended and grammatically immediate constituents, are often marked by open juncture. This is contrary to the iconic principle and another indication that phonology, grammar and semantics are not isomorphic, that is to say, not related constructionally one-to-one.

3.4.6 Minn Latt