Table 11: The students’ Writing Score in the post-test I
No Nama
Aspects of writing Tot.
0-100 C
0-30 O
0-20 V
0-20 L
0-25 M
1-5 1.
S1 28
20 15
18 4
85 2.
S2 23
17 15
12 3
70 3.
S3 20
17 13
15 4
69 4.
S4 27
19 18
23 5
92 5.
S5 28
20 18
23 5
94 6.
S6 25
20 17
20 4
86 7.
S7 30
20 17
18 5
90 8.
S8 30
20 18
22 5
95 9.
S9 27
20 18
18 5
88 10.
S10 23
20 18
20 5
86 11.
S11 25
20 16
14 5
80 12.
S12 27
18 15
21 4
85 13.
S13 30
20 18
23 5
96 14.
S14 30
20 20
25 5
100 15.
S15 25
17 14
20 4
80 16.
S16 27
20 16
13 4
80 17.
S17 30
20 16
19 5
90 18.
S18 30
20 15
13 4
82 19.
S19 20
20 12
15 5
72 20.
S20 24
20 18
20 4
86 21.
S21 26
20 14
16 4
80 22.
S22 18
11 10
12 2
53 23.
S23 30
20 16
15 4
85 24.
S24 17
20 15
19 5
76 25.
S25 20
12 10
15 4
61 26.
S26 30
20 18
18 5
91 27.
S27 25
18 8
12 4
67 28.
S28 30
20 15
19 3
87 29.
S29 20
18 10
12 5
65 30.
S30 30
20 18
20 5
93 31.
S31 30
18 18
23 5
94 32.
S32 26
17 13
18 4
78
Mean 25.96
18.81 15.37
18.84 4.37
82.37
Before the implementation of the actions, from the pre-test, the researcher found many errors done by the students almost in all aspects. Moreover, there
were some students who wrote some text in Indonesian while some others write the unknown word using Indonesia. There were 20 students below the standard
score. After conducting the action of Cycle I, the researcher found some improvement. From the post-test I, there were only 4 students who got the score
below the standard. The organization of the text of the most students was good. All of the students inserted the measure of the materials and signal words in the
steps. There was also improvement in the vocabulary use. Most of the students used right vocabularies. Unfortunately, there were still many things to be
improved. Although the students’ errors in mechanics were decreased, it had to be improved more. Minimum requirement mistakes were still found in some
students. There were also still 2 students who did the cheating. After conducting Cycle II, the researcher found there were more
improvements in many aspects than Cycle I. The minimum requirement mistakes were rarely found. Most of the students were good at vocabulary. There was no
cheating in the students’ writing. There were also 4 students who got perfect scores. It means that they did not do any errors in their writing.
Table 12: The students’ Writing Score in the post-test II
No Nama
Aspects of writing Tot.
0-100 C
0-30 O
0-20 V
0-20 L
0-25 M
1-5 1.
S1 30
20 16
19 5
90 2.
S2 23
17 15
20 5
80 3.
S3 30
20 17
19 5
91 4.
S4 30
20 18
23 4
95 5.
S5 23
20 20
23 4
90 6.
S6 30
20 17
22 5
94 7.
S7 30
20 19
23 5
97 8.
S8 30
20 16
21 5
92 9.
S9 30
20 18
18 5
96 10.
S10 30
20 20
25 5
100 11.
S11 26
20 18
20 5
89 12.
S12 30
20 20
25 5
100 13.
S13 27
20 18
23 5
93 14.
S14 30
20 18
25 5
98 15.
S15 27
20 16
16 5
84 16.
S16 30
20 18
23 5
96 17.
S17 30
20 10
17 5
83 18.
S18 30
20 17
13 4
84 19.
S19 27
20 16
17 5
85 20.
S20 30
20 20
25 5
100 21.
S21 30
20 25
23 5
98 22.
S22 20
18 15
17 5
75 23.
S23 30
20 20
12 5
88 24.
S24 30
20 15
15 5
85 25.
S25 17
20 18
17 4
76 26.
S26 30
20 18
25 5
98 27.
S27 26
20 10
12 4
72 28.
S28 30
20 18
18 3
89 29.
S29 28
20 13
15 5
83 30.
S30 30
20 20
25 5
100 31.
S31 30
20 18
25 5
98 32.
S32 26
17 18
23 5
89
Mean 28.12
19.75 17.34
