Review of Literature REVIEW OF LITERATURES, CONCEPTS AND THEORITICAL
observation and interviewed. The writer used Holmes 1992 theory to analyze the data. The relevant of this study to the present study is in term of theoretical
framework using Holmes’s theory 1992. The weakness of this paper is in the
explanation of the data and theory. Compared to other studies related to the topic, the explanation of the data in this paper is too simple.
English Pidgin Used by the Traders in Guwang Art Market by Surya 2008. The purpose in this study is generally to investigate about the forms of the
English pidgin used by the Traders in Guwang Art Market. The writer discussed about the grammatical aspects of pidginization including the positive forms
Positive Statements, Positive Instructions, and Positive Offerings, Negative forms Negative Statements and Negative Instructions and discussed about the Negative
forms YesNo Questions, WH-Questions and Alternative Questions. The investigation conducted in this study was based on the sociolinguistic theory
particularly the theory which proposed by Muhlhausler 1986 he clarify that in pidgin, the grammatical category of tense is lost. The observation was focused on
the grammatical and phonological aspect. The relevant to this study are in terms of the object of the study which used traders as the informants and the discussion
focused to the grammatical aspect. However, the difference of this study to present study is on the analysis. The present study divided the grammatical forms into
syntactical and morphological forms. The Analysis of Pidginized English in Conversations between Vendors
and Foreigners in Sanur Beach by Dian 2011. The writer tried to identify and describe the Pidginized English forms especially the syntax and morphology
forms and also analyzing conversational activities which took place between vendors and foreigners in types of language functions that commonly used when
they have conversation. Besides, the writer also tried to find out factors that influence the used of Pidginized English in Sanur Beach. She also used the
theoretical framework from An Introduction to Sociolinguistics by Wardhaugh 1986 and Pidgin and Creole Linguistics by Mulhausler 1986. The writer gave
clear explanation in analyzing the problems of her study. However, she did not attach the data of the informants as the appendix and for some sub chapters the
writer did not explain them clearly. The relevant to this study is in term of the problems which is the first problem focuses on the syntax and morphology forms.
However, the sub chapters were different between this study to present study depend on the data compiled during conducting the research.
After reviewing those three undergraduate theses above, the data was compared to this study. The comparison between those studies and this recent study
brings the similarities and differences. The similarities are all of the studies discuss about Pidginized English in Sociolinguistic study. However the data conduct in
different places. The difference can also be found in the analysis. The previous theses focus discussing in grammatical or phonological point, however, in this study
discuss about syntactical and morphological point of view. This study is also inspired by an article entitled “Pidgin and Hawai’i
English: An overview” Katie Drager: 2010 in an International Journal of Language, Translation and Intercultural Communication. This journal presents a
brief discussion of the h istory of both the creole called Pidgin or Hawai’i Creole
and the variety of English spoken in Hawai’i referred to as Hawai’i English. This study also treats Pidgin and Hawai’i English as independent from one another while
commenting on some of the linguistic forms that are found in both. Lexical items, phonological forms, and syntactic structures of Pidgin and Hawai’i English are
presented alongside a discussion of language attitudes and ideologies. The relevant of this journal to this study are in term of the pidginized English focuses in
syntactical form.