commit to user
e. Reflecting the result of the observation
In  conducting  the  evaluation  process,  the  teacher  gives  pre-test before starting the action and at the end of cycle one, students are given post-
test. The test is in the form of speaking test. In this test, the students are asked to  answer  the  following  questions  orally  in  order  to  know  how  well  their
intelligibility, vocabulary adequacy and accuracy. After  giving  the  test,  the  writer  analyzes  the  result  of  the  test  to
know the students’ speaking proficiency. The teacher then makes an analysis based  on  the  result  of  the  test  has  been  done  by  the  students  and  her
observation  during  the  action  being  carried  out  to  make  a  reflection  about what she has being done so far. It is also claimed to find the weaknesses of the
activities has been done. In  this  action  research,  there  is  a  standard  to  stop  the  cycle.  The  cycle  is
stopped when the indicator can be achieved. The indicator is that each student can improve  their  score  and  there  is  a  significant  difference  between  students’
speaking  proficiency  before  and  after  the  action.  The  grade  of  competencies  of students’  speaking  proficiency  used  in  this  study  is  adapted  from  the  criteria  of
assessment of speaking test in H. Douglas Brown page: 100:
a. Grammar
COMPETENCY SCORE
Errors in grammar are frequent but can be understood by a native speaker used to dealing with foreigners attempting to speak his
1
commit to user
language. Can usually handle elementary constructions quite accurately but does
not have thorough or confident control of the grammar. 2
Control of grammar is good. Able to speak the language with sufficient structural accuracy to participate effectively in most formal and
informal conversations or practical, social and professional topics. 3
Able to use the language accurately on all levels normally pertinent to professional needs. Errors in grammar are quite rare.
4 Equivalent to that of an educated native speaker.
5
b. Vocabulary
COMPETENCY SCORE
Speaking  vocabulary  inadequate  to  express  anything  but  the  most elementary needs
1 Has  speaking  vocabulary  sufficient  to  express  himself  simply  with
some circumlocution. 2
Able  to  speak  the  language  with  sufficient  vocabulary  to  participate effectively  in  most  formal  and  informal  conversations  on  practical,
social  and  professional  topics.  Vocabulary  is  board  enough  that  he rarely has to grope for a word.
3 Can understand and participate in any conversation within the range of
his experience with a high degree of precision of vocabulary 4
His speech on all levels is fully accepted by educated native speakers in  all  its  features  including  breadth  of  vocabulary  and  idioms,
colloquialism, and pertinent cultural reference. 5
c. Comprehension
COMPETENCY SCORE
Within  the  scope  of  his  very  limited  language  experience  can understand  simple  questions  and  statements  allowing  for  slowed
speech, repetition, or paraphrases. 1
Can get the gist of most conversations of non –technical subjects i.e., topics which require no specialized knowledge
2
commit to user
Comprehension is quite complete for a normal rate of speech. 3
Can understand any conversation within the range of his experience. 4
Equivalent to that of an educated native speaker. 5
d. Fluency