to measure their scores after the actions. Both of the test measured how the actions affect students‟ listening skills.
C. Instruments of the Research
The researcher used some instruments in collecting the data. There were interview questions,
field notes and students‟ test. 1. Interview guidelines
This questions related to the data that the researcher wants to get. The researcher conducted interview with both teacher and students. The answers of the
questions covered any information related to teaching learning process. The answers stated in the interview transcripts and used as guidelines in creating
conclusions whether the technique could improve the student‟s skill or not. 2. Observation sheets
Observation sheets were used to record the process of teaching and learning. The observation sheets was referred by putting a tick to statements of
theteaching and learning process which were done. 3.
Students‟ test Students‟ test were used as instruments to get information about students‟
ability while and after the action. There were pretest and posttest. Both of them showed students‟ score before and after the technique implemented. From that
scores, researcher can compared the students‟ scores.
4. The listening rubric The tests given to the students were in the form of essay test. Thus, it
needs a rubric for scoring their work. The listening rubric was used to determine the students‟ score on every test they did. The rubric was adapted from several
resources. Here is the rubric for the listening scoring.
Table 1: Listening Rubric
Assessment Rubric for Interpretive Listening Competence Target
Acceptable Unacceptable
Demonstrates ability to interpret an oral message
on a number of levels, analyze it from a number
of perspectives, provide a detailed
personal interpretation of the text supported by a
rich range of cultural knowledge.
Demonstrates a clear understanding of the
target cultures as a system in which cultural
perspectives are reflected through practices
products Demonstrates ability to
interpret synthesize Demonstrates the
ability to move beyond literal comprehension
of an oral message, infer the meaning of
unfamiliar words phrases in new
contexts, infer interpret the author‟s
intent, offer a personal interpretation
of the message Demonstrates
knowledge of the target cultures and its
reflection in its products and practices
with a few insignificant errors or with a few
lacking elements
. Demonstrates ability
to interpret synthesize ideas.
Identifies main ideas most important
details of an oral message, begins to
move beyond literal comprehension,
identifies either the author‟s or cultural
perspectives. Identifies some of the
products and practices of the target culture but
shows inadequate understanding of the
target culture as a system of values.
Shows a limited ability to interpret
ideas critical issues from multiple
viewpoints. Identifies an abundant
number of details that are relevant for
understanding main ideasevents
Identifies many of the details that are relevant
for understanding main ideasevents.
synthesize ideas. Identifies some details
but they are insufficient or irrelevant for
understanding main ideasevents.
D. Setting of the Research
Kategori