After the students grouped, he told what they should do in the next step. They should reconstuct the text they heard. Some students seemed not giving their
contribution to their group. After all of the students finished their work, he asked some students to write on the white board. They compared their work together.
3. Reflection
The implementation of the dictogloss technique in the first cycle was done in Tuesday, May 20th 2014. After the implementation, a reflection was conducted.
Dictogloss technique had successfully prevented the students from getting bored. The students enjoyed the materials so the process went adequately well. However,
the students still lacked of awareness. They seemed aware in asking about their difficulties.
The researcher did not get any difficulties to transfer the materials about dictogloss. However the students seemed to be crowded when they were grouped
and spending much time. The interaction between the students and the researcher as a teacher was
getting adequate. He involved in every group discussion and the students were willing to ask him after his prompting. Moreover, the interaction between students
themselves was also getting better. However, in reconstruction stage there were only some students who contributed to reconstruct the text. The English teacher
also had a same note. She argued that both the researcher and the students were in need of improvement. This can be seen from the extract of interview transcript
below.
Vignette 6 R
: Selamat siang, bu. Good afternoon, ma‟am.
ET : Siang, silakan masuk. Sebentar ya.Afternoon. Please, come in. Wait a minute
ET : Ini sudah saya buat beberapa catatan selama cycle pertama. Lebih baik
masnya tetap di KD yang kemarin untuk cycle ke-2 dengan melakukan perbaikan- perbaikan tentunya.Here this is, I had made some notes during the first cycle. You
better stay on the same basic competence for the next cycle with improvements indeed. R
: Iya bu, siswa masih terkesan kurang kesadarannya. Apa salahnya di saya atau gimanaya bu?
Yes, ma‟am. The students still lacked of awareness. Was it something wrong with my teaching?
ET : Sebenarnya hanya masnya yang kurang percaya diri saja. Untuk dampak
penggunaan teknik dictoglossnya sudah cukup terlihat, hanya saja pada saat merekonstruksi teks dan membuat grup masih memakan banyak waktu Truthfully, you
only need to be more confident. The dictogloss technique sure have impact, yet, in fact, the students wasted much time to reconstruct the texts and grouping.
R
: teknik dictogloss cukup efektif, masih pada KD yang sama, dan harus meningkatkan manajemen waktu dan kesadaran siswa untuk lebih efektif dalam
mengerjakan soalnya bu?dictogloss technique were quite effective, should be still in the same basic competence, and should improve both the time management and the
students‟ awareness, is that all ma‟am? ET
: Seperti itu kurang lebih untuk bayangan di cycle 2 nanti. Yes, that‟s all, more
or less. R
: Iya bu, terimakasih. Yes, ma‟am, thanks
In conclusion, the dictogloss technique sure had an impact in the students ‟
listening process. The materials successfully amused them so they did not easily get bored and stayed focused. Nevertheless, there were still some problems in the
students‟ awareness. The researcher and the collaborator agreed to continue the cycle to solve the remaining problems.
C. Implementation of Cycle 2
1. Planning
Based on the reflection in cycle 1, the researcher found that dictogloss technique could improve the students‟ listening skill. However, the researcher
found that some students still could implement the reconstruction stage well. They
