72.74 Findings After Implementing the Action

10 P = ── X 100 42 P = 23.81 From the calculation above, it is known the students’ percentage score is 23.81. It means that there are ten students who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM and there are thirty two students who still get the score below the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM, from the percentage above, the writer gave the diagram to show the students’ achievement in understanding simple present tense is very low. The diagram as following: After that, the researcher calculated the mean score of post-test I. To know the students’ score improvement from the pre-test to post-test I result. It is calculated by using the formula: _ ∑x X = ── n 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Nilai 65 Nilai 65 Nilai 65 28 4 10 The Result of Students Score before Implementation _ 3055 X = ─── 42 _ X = 72.74 From the calculation above, the students’ mean score of post-test I is 72.74. It means that there are some improvements in conducting the action by using substitution rills. It could be seen from the pre-test mean score 55.95 to the post-test I mean score 72.74. So it can be concluded that there is improvement of students’ score until 16.79 72.74 – 55.95. T he next step is to get the percentage of students’ improvement score from pre-test to post-test I. The writer used the formula: y1 - y P = ─── X 100 y 72.74 – 55.95 P = ──────── X 100 55.95 16.79 P = ──── X 100 55.95 P = 30.01 Based on the computation above, it could be seen that the percentage of the students’ improvement in understanding of simple present tense from pre-test to post-test I is 30.01. It means that the score in cycle 1 has improved. The last step is to get the percentage of students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM the calculation by using the formula: F P = ── X 100 N 30 P = ── X 100 42 P = 71.43 Based on the calculation above, it is showed the percentage of students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM in post-test I is 71.43 . It is concluded the students’ improvement in post-test I who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM is 47.62 71.43 - 23.81. It is calculated there are twelve students who get the score below the standard of the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM. The students’ score who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM it could be seen from the diagram below: After the researcher conducted cycle 2 of Classroom Action Research, she gave the post-test II to the students in order to know the application of using substitution drills in teaching simple present tense successful and effective or not. The first step is the researcher to calculate the mean score of the test in post-test II, it is used the formula: _ ∑x X = ── n _ 3190 X = ─── 42 _ X = 75.95 From that calculation, the mean score of post-test II in the cycle 2 is 75.95. It showed that there are some students’ improvement score 3.21 75.95 – 72.74 from the mean score of post-test in cycle 1. The second step is to know the calculation of the percentage of students’ improvement score. The researcher used the formula: 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Nilai 65 Nilai 65 Nilai 65 12 3 27 The Result of Students Score Post-test I in Cycle I y2 - y P = ──── X 100 y 75.95 – 55.95 P = ───────── X 100 55.95 20 P = ──── X 100 55.95 P = 35.75 From the computation above, it could be known that the students’ score in the post-test II in cycle 2 improves 11.94 35.75 - 23.81 from pre-test and 5.74 35.75 - 30.01 from the post-test I in cycle 1. Then the next step is to calculate the perce ntage from the students’ score who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM in post-test II. The researcher used the formula: F P = ── X 100 N 38 P = ── X 100 42 P = 90.48 Based on absolute calculation above, it is known the percentage of students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM is 90.48. It means that in cycle 2 there are thirty eight students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM and there are only four students are below the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM. The class percentage of post-test II obviously showed some improvements from the previous test, the improvement is 66.67 90.48 - 23.81 from the pre test. The highest score in this post-test II is 100 and the lowest score is 40. The students’ score who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM and who still below the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM it can be seen in the diagram below:

B. The Interpretation of Test Result

Based on the result of the pre-test, the post-test I and the post-test II, the writer can interpret the data and gave the diagram, and also describing the results. Here it is the diagram: 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Nilai 65 Nilai 65 Nilai 65 4 2 36 The Result of Students Score Post-test II in Cycle II Based on the diagram above the writer can explain about the detail of the result as following: The first, before conducting the Classroom Action Research CAR the researcher gave the pre test to the students the diagram above showed that the mean of students’ score on understanding of simple present tense before using substitution drills is 55.95. Meanwhile, the class percentage which passes the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM is 23.81. It means that there are only ten students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM and there are thirty two students who still below the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM. Next is the result of post-test I after the researcher conducting the CAR using substitution drills, the mean of students’ score is 72.74. The result of the mean score is the students’ achievement of simple present tense increased from the pre- test. It proved that there are some improvement of students’ score from the pre-test that is 16.79 72.74 – 55.95 or 30.01. And than, the class percentage which pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM is 71.43. From the data means there are thirty students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM and there are only twelve students who still below the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM. Although, the result of the class percentage which pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM has a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Nilai 65 Nilai 65 Nilai 65 28 4 10 12 3 27 4 2 36 Pre Test Post Test I Post Test II significant improved, but it could not achieve the target yet of success CAR crite rion that is 75 or at least 32 students from the students’ percentage which pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM. Because that, the researcher continued to conduct this CAR in the next cycle. The last is the result of the mean score in the post-test II in cycle 2 is 75.95. It means that the students’ improvement score is 3.21 75.95 – 72.74 from the post-test I 72.74 or 35.75 students’ improvement in the score percentage from the pre test. In the percentage of students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM in the post-test II shows that there is 90.48. It means that there are thirty eight students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM and only four students are still below the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM. This class percentage shows some improvements 90.48 from the pre-test 23.81 and post-test I 71.43 in the class percentage. The post-test II of cycle 2 has fulfilled the target of Classroom Action Research CAR because there is above 75 of students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM. From the interpretation of the data above, it shows that using Substitution Drills can deve lop students’ understanding of the simple present tense, and finally it can be said that the Classroom Action Research CAR is success and the researcher ends the cycle.

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Developing students' ability in using present continuous tense through contextual teaching learning ( A classroom action research in the seventh grade of SMP al-Mubarak Pondok Aren)

0 15 159

The efectiveness of using dialogue techique in teaching simple present tense: a pre-experimental study at the first grade of the students in MTsN Tangerang II Pamulang

0 11 61

Analysis Of The Students’ Ability In Using The Simple Past Tense (A Descriptive Study At The Second Grade Of Smp Negeri 3 South Tangerang )

0 5 69

Presented to the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher’s Training in a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of S.Pd. (Bachelor of Art) in English Language Education

1 12 102

Improving students’ understanding in using passive voice of the present and past tense through Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL): a classroom action research at eleven-grade SMK Kesehatan Bina Insan Cendekia Karawaci

2 19 108

The Use of Single Slot Substitution Drill to Teach Simple Present Tense for the Seventh Grade Students of SMP N 1 Bawang, Batang in the Academic Year of 2010 2011

2 20 212

IMPROVING THE ABILITY IN USING SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE SENTENCES THROUGH SUBSTITUTION DRILL | Amrudin | ELTS JOURNAL 2126 6265 1 PB

0 0 12

The Use of Freaky Facts Cards As a Media to Improve Students Writing Skill in Composing Simple Present Tense ( A Classroom Action Research for the seventh grade of MTS Satu Atap Salatiga in academic year 2015/2016 ) - Test Repository

0 0 84

THE USE OF COURSE REVIEW HORAY TO INCREASE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY IN SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMK Muhammadiyah Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2017/2018) - Test Repository

0 2 136