fungsional pendek
sangat sederhana untuk berinteraksi
dengan lingkungan terdekat
sangat sederhana secara akurat,
lancar dan
berterima untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan terdekat - Daftar benda barang
Shoping list - Ucapan selamat
- Pengumuman
2. Mengidentifikasi tujuan teks fungsional
3. Mengidentifikasi bentuk teks fungsional
.2. Merespon
makna gagasan yang terdapat
dalam teks
lisan fungsional
pendek sangat sederhana secara
akurat, lancar
dan berterima
untuk berinteraksi
dengan lingkungan terdekat
. Mengidentifikasi makna gagasan dalam teks lisan
fungsional pendek berupa: -
Instruksi -
Shopping list -
Greeting card - Announcement
2. Mengidentifikasi makna interpersonal
teks lisan
fungsional pendek
3.Mengidentifikasi makna tersirat dalam teks lisan
fungsional pendek : 3. Berbicara
Mengungkapkan makna 1
Mengungkapkan makna
dalam percakapan transaksional
Mengungkapkan berbagai tindak tutur:
1. Menyapa
yang
dalam percakapan
transaksional dan
interpersonal sangat
sederhana untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan terdekat dan interpersonal dengan
menggunakan ragam
bahasa lisan
sangat sederhana secara akurat,
lancar dan
berterima untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan terdekat
yang melibatkan tindak tutur :
orang menyapa yang belum
dikenal,memperkenalkan diri sendiri orang lain,
dan memerintah atau melarang.
3.2 Mengungkapkan makna
dalam percakapan transaksional
dan interpersonal dengan menggunakan
ragam bahasa
lisan sangat
sederhana secara akurat, lancar
dan berterima
untuk berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan terdekat yang melibatkan tindak
tutur : meminta dan memberi
informasi, mengucapkan
terima kasih meminta maaf dan
belumsudah dikenal 2.
Memperkenalkan diri sendiriorang lain.
3.Memerintahmelarang Bertanya dan menjawab
tentang : 1.
Meminta dan
memberi informasi
2. Mengucapkan
terima kasih 3.
Meminta maaf
4. Mengungkapkan
dan merespons kesantunan
mengungkapkan kesantunan
: 4. Berbicara
Mengungkapkan makna dalam
teks lisan
fungsional pendek
sangat sederhana untuk berinteraksi
dengan lingkungan terdekat
4.1 Mengungkapkan makna
tindak tutur
fungsional pendek
sangat sederhana secara akurat,
lancar dan
berterima untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan terdekat
4.2.Mengungkapkan makna gagasan dalam
teks lisan
fungsional pendek sangat sederhana
secara akurat, lancar, dan
berterima untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan terdekat 1.Memberi instruksi
2.Menyebut daftar benda 3.Mengucapkan selamat
4.Mengumumkan dengan Singkat
1. Memberi
insruksi secara lisan.
2. Menyebutkan daftar
barang yang dibutuhkan.
3. Memberi
ucapan selamat
4. Mengumumkan
sesuatu
5. Membaca
Memahami makna
dalam teks
tulis fungsional
pendek 5.1 Membaca nyaring
bermakna kata, frasa, dan
kalimat dengan
ucapan, tekanan
dan intonasi yang berterima
1. Melafalkan
kata, frasa dan kalimat dengan
baik dan benar
2. Membaca kata frasa
sangat sederhana yang berkaitan
dengan lingkungan terdekat
yang berkaitan dengan lingkungan terdekat
5.2 Merespon makna yang terdapat dalam teks
tulis fungsional pendek sangat sederhana secara
akurat, lancar
dan berterima yang berkaitan
dengan lingkungan
terdekat dan
kalimat dengan
intonasi yang benar
3. Membaca nyaring
dengan baik dan benar. 1.
Mengidentifikasi berbagai informasi dalam
teks fungsional
pendek berbentuk :
• Instruksi
• Daftar barang
• Kartu ucapan
• Pengumuman
2. Mengidentifikasi ciri kebahasaan
teks yang
dibaca 3.
Membahas tujuan
masing-masing teks
fungsional yang
telah dibahas.
6.Menulis
Mengungkapkan makna dalam
teks tulis
fungsional pendek
sangat sederhana untuk berinteraksi
dengan lingkungan terdekat
6.1 Mengungkap-kan makna gagasan dalam
teks tulis
fungsional pendek sangat sederhana
dengan menggunakan
ragam bahasa
tulis secara akurat, lancar dan
berterima untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan terdekat 1.Melengkapi
teks fungsional pendek
2.Menyusun kataurutan
kata menjadi kalimat yang padu
3.Menulis teks fungsional pendek
6.2.Mengungkapkan langkah retorika dalam
teks tulis
fungsional pendek sangat sederhana
dengan menggunakan
ragam bahasa
tulis secara akurat, lancar dan
berterima untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan terdekat 4. Menyusun kata atau
frasa menjadi kalimat yang padu.
5. Menyusun kalimat acak menjadi
kalimat yang
padu. 6. Mengidentifikasi ciri-ciri
teks fungsional
pendek yang
diberikan dengan
bantuan guru. 7. Mengidentifikasi ciri-ciri
teks fungsional
pendek yang
diberikan dengan
bantuan guru. 8. mengidentifikasi ciri-ciri
teks fungsional
pendek yang
diberikan secara
mandiri. 9.
Melengkapi teks
fungsional dengan struktur teks yang benar.
10. Menulis
teks fungsional pendek.
E. Relevant studies
There are two relevant study that the writer get. They are: First, the relevant study is conducted by Shaumi Fitriyani under the title
Analyzing the content Validity of the English Summative Tests at some Vocational School A Case study in Odd semester of second year Technology major in
Tangerang Vocational schools. The aim of the research was to find empirical evidence whether vocational school whose English Summative test has a good
content validity, to conclude whether three vocational schools in Tangerang have made English summative test in good content validity, and to get the additional
information whether the English summative tests that has content validity. The method used in study was a qualitative and a quantitative method a mixed
method. The researcher used the qual-quan model or the exploratory method. The result of the study showed that English summative tests at the odd semester of
both vocational school SMKN 3 Tangerang and SMK Teknologi Informatika YPML Tangerang have attained 50 that felt into a “Sufficient” level of content
validity in constructing the English summative, SMKN 1 Tangerang had only 35,71. It felt into a less good level. In addition, the English teacher of each
vocational school also still had a low ability in constructing the English summative test ites that have a good content validity.
40
Second, the relevant study is conducted by Khristiana under the title An Analyzing on the Content Validity of the summative tests for the second grade of
Junior High School A Case study of SMPTPP Daarul Amanah Tangerang. The aim of the research decribe clearly about the content validity of English
Summative test made by the profesional team for the odd semester of the second grade students carried out at SMPTPP Daarul Amanah. The method that is used
qualitative research in which the writer collected the data by asking the English summative paper and syllabus to the school and the writer also did unstructured
interview to the team teachers who made the test items of the summative test. The
40
Shaumi Fitriyanti “Analyzing the Content Validityof the English Summative Tests at some Vocational Schools. A Case Study in Odd Semester of Second Year Technology Major in
Tangerang Vocational Schools”, Skripsi of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta; UIN Syarif
Hidayatullah , 2014, p.v, unpublished.
results of the research see that the test items of English summative test for the odd semester of the second grade students in SMPTPP Daarul Amanah have bad
content validity.
41
Third, The relevant of study is conducted by Grace Yao, Chin Huei Wu, and Cheng ta Yang under the title Examining the Content Validity of the
WHOQOL- BREF from Respondents’ perspective by Quantitative Methods. The
purpose of this journal is to introduce and demonstrate how to use qualitatitive methods to examine the content validity for a certain measurement from
respondents’ viewpoin with quantitative method. Method that is used is quantitative methods. The results showed that content structure gained from
approppriateness rating and item sorting was not totally consistent with the original content structure of the WHOQOL-BREF, among 24 items, 12 items did
not have adequate content validity.
42
41
Khristiana “Analyzing on the content validity of the Summative Tests for the second grade of Junior High School A Case Study of SMPTPP Daarul Amanah Tangerang, skripsi of UIN Syarif
Hidayatullah, Jakarta; UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2014,p.v, unpublished.
42
Grace Yao, Chin Huei Wu, and Cheng ta Yang “Examining the Content Validity of the
WHOQOL- BREF from Respondents’ perspective by Quantitative Methods”, Journal Springer
science+business media 2007
CHAPTER III METHODE OF STUDY
A.Place and Time of the study
This research is conducted at three junior high schools, especially in seventh grade students of junior high schools. The schools has accredited A, B,
and one has not accredited yet. They are SMPN 12 South Tangerang which has accredited A, SMP UTAMA has adredited B, and SMP IT MADANI 8 which has
not accredited yet. This research has been taken in different times. SMPN 12 South Tangerang on February 19 2016, SMP UTAMA on February 24 2016, and
SMP IT MADANI 8 on February 17 2016.
B. Research Method and Design
The method of this study is Quantitative method. The writer used Quantitative method because a lot of data are quantitative.
The design of this study is Comparative design. James and Sally defines, Comparative design is the researcher investigates whether there are differences
between two or more groups on phenomena being studied.
1
Jack and Norman defines, Comparative design is research when investigators attempt to determine
differences that already exist between or among groups or individuals.
2
Futhermore Alan defines Comparative design is design that attempt direct comparison between two or more cases.
3
From the definition above, the writer can conlude that comparative design is design that try compare two or more cases.
1
James H.McMillan and Sally Schumacher, Reseach in Education evidence-Based Inquiry, New York: Pearson Education, 2006. P. 25
2
Jack R.Frankel and Norman E. Wallen, How to design and Evaluate Research in Education, New York: Mc.Graw-Hill Higher Education, 2009. P. 363
3
Alan Byman, Social research Methods, New York: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2012. P. 72. 25
C. The Object of the Study
The object of this study are English summative tests from three schools that have accredited A, B, and has not accredited yet at odd semester 20152016.
The school consist SMPN 12 South Tangerang, SMP UTAMA, and SMP IT MADANI 8. SMPN 12 South Tangerang which has accredited A, SMP UTAMA
has adredited B, and SMP IT MADANI 8 which has not accredited yet.
D. Instrument of the Study
1. Documentation Record Documentation record is one of important instrument to be collected in
this research. The documentation record is collected with two forms; they are syllabus and English Summative tests. Futhermore the indicator in syllabus is
used to reference to analyzing the test, how far the test confirms the indicator in syllabus by using a checklist table and English summative papers that are used as
object in analysing the data.
F. Technique of data collection
There are three steps in collecting the data in this skripsi, they are: 1.First step, the writer collects document such as syllabus and English summative
test from 3 schools. 2. Second step, the using of checklist table is intended to check and analyze the
number of which has comformity and unconformity with indicator in syllabus from point 23
’s indicator until 37. Because the writer just analyze in Reading and writing skill
. Futhermore, the result of checklist table is calculated by Sudjiono’s formula and percentage as describe into predicate category.
F. Technique of data Analyzing
To get data, the writer used some ways. First, The writer analyzed the conformity and unconformity level of English summative test to the syllabus in
