44
In order to know the students’ achievement in detail, the writer used the following formula to find out the average of the students’ achievement. The
formula is: The average of the students result
= the total percentage x 100 The number of students
= 2038 X 100 36
= 56.61
From the analysis above, it can be seen that the average achievement of the students’ pre-test was 56.61. The result was lower than the criterion that has
been stipulated by the Department of Education and Culture. The writer concluded that the students had difficulties to make a narrative text. Therefore,
teaching writing with a new method in each activity was important to improve the students’ achievement.
4.1.3 The Third Cycle
The third cycle was treatment. It was conducted from 4-7 January 2010. After conducting the pre-test, the writer gave some treatments to make students’
writing better. The writer explained about narrative text briefly. After that, the writer gave treatment, the writer focused on 5 elements: grammar, vocabulary,
mechanics, relevance and fluency, because the writer hoped that the students’ writing would improve by noticing those 5 elements. The next activity of this
cycle was giving a model. The writer let the students watch “Peter Pan” film which had been chosen as the media. The last step was giving a test. The result of
the test can be seen below:
45
The Result of the Test NO
` NAME
ELEMENTS’ SCORE TOTAL
SCORE G V M R F
1 AGASTIA
DEWANGGA 4 5 4 3 3 19 76 2
AKHMAD BAKHRIL
M. 4 4 3 2 4 18 72
3 ALFIAN
BAKHTI M.
5 4 4 4 4 21 84 4
AMALINDA KRIS
W. 4 2 4 3 2 15 60 5
ANITA DWI
SEPTIANI 3 5 4 4 2 18 72 6
ARUM PUJI
LESTARI 3 4 3 3 3 16 64 7
AYU PUSPITA
F. 3 4 5 3 3 18 72
8 BAGUS
KARISMA P.D. 4 3 3 4 3 17 68
9 BAKTI
SATRIA A.
5 3 3 2 3 16 64 10
BEKTI DWI SEPTI M. 3
4 3
3 2
15 60
11 BUYUNG
TEGAR A.
4 3 2 4 3 16 64 12
CATUR RINA
A. 4 3 4 3 2 16 64
13 EISMAYA
WIJAYANTI 4 4 3 3 4 18 72 14
ERIK RAHMAN
4 4 4 4 4 20 80 15
FANKY ADI
WALUYO 3 5 3 4 3 18 72 16
FARID AL
ROSYID 3 4 4 4 3 18 72
17 FARIZAL
KHAMID 5 4 3 3 3 18 72
18 FEBRIAN
RATNANTO 4 3 3 3 3 16 64 19
GIGIH BAGUS
P. 4 4 4 3 2 17 68
20 GITASARI
DARMITA 3 4 3 3 3 16 64 21
HADI KURNIANTO
3 5 3 4 3 18 72 22
HERRY LILIA
S. 3 4 3 3 3 16 64
23 IDA
ELSHA NASTITI 4 4 3 3 3 17 68
24 IQBAL
ANGGA P.
4 3 4 3 3 19 76 25
KRISTI NUR
AISAH 4 4 4 3 3 18 72
26 LULU
MELDAWATI 3 3 4 3 2 15 60
27 MARIA
YOHANA F.
3 3 4 4 2 16 64
46
28 MELITA
DEWI ANA
S. 4 4 4 3 3 18 72 29
NINDA BUDI
UTAMI 3 3 4 4 3 17 68 30
RACHEL AGUSTINE
W. 4 3 4 2 3 16 64
31 RENDI
KUSTRIAWAN 3 3 3 4 3 16 64 32
RILLO PAMBUDI
3 4 4 3 3 17 68 33
RIZQA AINUNI’MAH 4 3 3 4 3 17 68
34 SAFITRI
KARLINA 4 3 4 3 3 17 68
35 SYAMIMA
DZATI DINI 5 4 4 4 3 20 80
36 TANTI
KURNIASIH 4 4 3 3 3 17 68
∑ 36 134 133 127 118 105
617 2480
The average of the students result = the total percentage x 100
The number of students
= 2480X 100 36
= 68.88
Based on the analysis, the result of the students’ achievement in the third cycle was higher than the pre-test. The average of the students’ achievement in the
second cycle was 62.22. Therefore, it can be concluded that the third cycle was successful.
4.1.4 The Fourth Cycle
