Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015
ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3
Physics Education Page 356
Hiebert SM., Teaching Simple Experimental Design to Undergraduates: Do Your Students Understand the Basics?,
Advances Physiology Education,
31:82-92, 2007.
Herron, M. D, The nature of scientific enquiry.
School Review,
79, [2], 171-212, 1971.
Karelina, A. and Etkina, E., Acting like a physicist: Student approach study to experimental design,
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
3, 020106,
2007. Kolen, M. J., Zeng, L., Hanson, B. A., Conditional standard errors of measurement forscale
scores using IRT.
Journal of Educational Measurement
, 33, 129-140, 1996.
Madlazim and Supriyono, Improving Experiment Design Skills: Using The Joko Tingkir Program As A Learning Tool Of Tsunami Topic,
Science Of Tsunami Hazards
, 33, [2], 133-143, 2014.
Pavelich, M. J. Abraham, M. R., Guided inquiry laboratories for general chemistry students.
Journal of College in Science Teaching
, 7, [1], 23-26, 1977.
Pyle, Eric J. 2008. A Model of Inquiry for Teaching Earth Science.
Electronic Journal of Science Education
, 12, [2], 2008.
Şimşek, C.L., Classroom teacher candidates‟ sufficiency of analyzing the experiments in primary school science and technology t
extbooks‟ in terms of scientific process skills,
Elementary Education Online,
9, [2], 433-445, 2010.
Science Pioneers. Experiment Design and Scientific Method.
Inspiring Scientific Curiosity And Learning For A Better Community
Students and research: Practical strategies for science classrooms and competitions. Cothron, J. H., Giese, R. N., Rezba, R. J. 3rd Ed.. Dubuque, IA: KendallHunt Publishing
Company, 2000. Volkmann, M. J. and Abel, S. K., Rethinking Laboratories-Tools for Converting Cookbook
Labs into Inquiry.
The Science Teacher
, 38-41, 2003. Wenning, C.J., Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online,
2, [3], 3-11, 2005.
Wenning, C.J., Levels of inquiry: Using inquiry spectrum learning sequences to teach science.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online,
5, [4], 11-19, 2010.
Wenning, Carl J., The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online,
6, [2], Summer 2011
Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015
ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3
Physics Education Page 357
SELF ASSESSMENT AND PEER ASSESSMENT IN ELECTRICAL MEASURING INSTRUMENTS LEARNING : STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS AND ITS
CORRELATION
Asri Arbie
1
1
Departement of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, State University of Gorontalo, Indonesia
asri_arbieyahoo.com
Abstract Lately, Student Centered Learning SCL approach is being promoted and used intensively in
university level with Active Learning AL as a learning main mode. Therefore, alternative assessment approach, in this case, self-assessment SA and peer-assessment PA, become important to be used
as an assessment technique in learning evaluation for sustaining the implementation of SCL and AL. This study is about implementation of SA and PA in learning process, focus on students perceptions
about SA and PA as an course evaluation technique and the correlation between SA, PA, students perceptions and students academic performance. This research involves 39 students 57,53 of
Electrical Measuring Instruments course in 2015. SA and PA instrument is rank order item and scale with 10 rank about soft skills, while instrument for students perception about SA and PA is
questionnaire with five-point scale using Likert scale. SA and PA instrument were handed to the students after one semester of course or 16 times practicing in laboratory and field practice, while
instrument for students perception was handed a week after that. The result shows that there are various perception in a narrow range from student about SA andor PA, all in positive perception.
Besides that, the study shows that correlation degree between SA,PA, student perception and student academic performance have a various correlation degree in range low and moderate.
Keywords: Self-assessment, peer-assessment, students perception.
1. Introduction
