Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015
ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3
Physics Education Page 368
3.1.3.7. Student Learning Outcomes
The percentage of students who reach KKM completed reached 93.33 and which did not reach KKM not complete 6.67.
3.2. Discussion
Based on the research and analysis of the data showed that the use of models of research- based learning can improve student learning outcomes of class A, B, and C, Department of
Physics Education, Gorontalo State University. This can be seen from the analysis of student results conducted for 2 cycles of learning, where students’ learning outcomes on the second
cycle increased rather than in cycle 1. Therefore, it is proven that the models of research based learning, especially in material of Behaviorism Learning Theory and Learning Theory
of Constructivism. This is because it is supported by student learning motivation. Motivation to learn the students during the research-based learning falls into both categories. In addition,
based on the observation of activities of lecturers and students from the first meeting until the meeting II has increased from meeting to the next meeting. Based on this, it can be concluded
that the models of research based learning can enhance the activity of lecturers and students. The higher activity of students in the higher learning student results.
This shows that research-based learning can help students in the learning process of students, so that students’ ability can be trained. By applying the concept of research-based learning
obtained by students will stick in his mind a long time since the acquisition of knowledge of students based on a case which aims to preserve the memory of students. This is in line with
that proposed by Diah 2010: 7 that the benefits of research-based learning model that learners experience the development and improvement of capabilities and competencies
higher, including for example the general competence to think critically and analytically, evaluating and troubleshooting information. The condition has a positive impact on student
learning outcomes as shown by the average scores of students after being treated by applying research-based learning.
References
Abdjul, T. 2010. Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe
STAD
Melalui Metode Penemuan Terbimbing Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. [Effect of Application
of Cooperative Learning Model STAD through Invention Methods against Guided Students Learning Outcomes].
Independent research.
[Bahasa Indonesia] Ntobuo, N. Yusuf, M. 2012. Pengembangan model-model pembelajaran sains melalui
pendekatan PAKEM di SDMI se Kecamatan Suwawa Selatan. [Development of models of science learning through PAKEM approach in SDMI se District of South
Suwawa].
Competitive Research Grant.
Ntobuo, N. 2010. Pengembangan Structure Exersice Method dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Di SDN 80 Kota Tengah Kota Gorontalo. [Structure exersice Methode
Development in Improving Student Results In SDN 80 Central City City of Gorontalo]. DIA BERMUTU Research.
Supartin Ntobuo, N. 2013.
Pengembangan Model-model Pembelajaran PAKEM berintegrasi pembelajaran Karakter di SMP se Propinsi Gorontalo [ Development of
models to integrate the learning Character PAKEM Learning in Junior High School Gorontalo province]
Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015
ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3
Physics Education Page 369
Mulyatingsih. 2010.
Pengembangan Model-Model Pembelajaran. [Development of Learning Models] .
Surabaya. Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S. Sammel, M.J Sivasailam. 1974.
Instructional Development Training For Exceptional Children Teacher of a Sourcebook.
Minnepoli: Indiana University.
Umar, K. Masri dan Abdjul, Tirtawaty. 2011. Pengembangan Model pembelajaran Berbasis Riset di Jurusan Fisika. [Evelopment of Model-Based Learning Research at the
Department of Physics].
Research Development P rogram.
Trianto. 2010.
Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasinya dalam KTSP
. [
Integrated Learning Model Concept, Strategy, and Implementation in SBC] .
Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Widyawati,
et al.
2010.
Pedoman Umum Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset PUPBR
. [
General Guidelines Based Learning Research PUPBR] .
Gadjah Mada University.
Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015
ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3
Physics Education Page 370
THE RELATION OF STUDENTS LEARNING INTEREST AND MATHEMATICS LOGIC INTELLIGENCE TOWORD STUDENTS LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT OF
PHYSICS EDUCATION
Masri Kudrat Umar
1
, Supartin
1
, Indrawati Moomin
1
1
Depatemen of Physics, Faculty of Matematics and Natural Science, State University of Gorontalo, Gorontalo, Indonesia
masrikudratyahoo.com
Abstract The Relation of students Learning Interest and Mathematics Logic Intelligence toword Students
Learning Achievement of Physics Education, Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, State University of Gorontalo. The research aimed at investigating the relation of
students’ learning achievement and mathematics logic intelligence toward students’ learning achievement of Physics subject at SMA Muhammadiyah Batudaa. The research applied quantitative
method ussing statistic analysis through regression and correlation tests. From the result of the measurement, it gained the regression eguation as
Ŷ = , 0 + 0,
X + 0, X which meant
that each increase as one unit of the score of students’ learning interest and mathematics logic intelligence, it would be followed by the increaseof the score of Physics learning achievement as 0,425
and 0,476 at the constanta of 64,203. The hypothesis test showed that the correlation coefficient resulted r= 0,6417 and determination coefficient resulted r
2
=0,41185 or 41,19. Thus, the test of the significance of correlation coefficient gained thet the of t
count
was higher than the value of t
table
, or it can be stated as follows: 9,451.7 at level of significance as 0,05. Thus, it can be concluded that there
was a relation of students’ learning achievement and mathematics logic intelligence toward students’ learning achievement of Physics subject at SMA. Therefore, the teacher should be creative to
improve students’ learning interest in order the Physics learning goals can be achieved. Keywords: learning interest, mathematics l
ogic intelligence, and students’ learning achievement of physics
1. Introduction
That the results of physics students learn in high school still tend to need to be increased. Efforts to improve student learning outcomes could be done through various ways of them
through increased competence inidivisual sisiwa and increased variety of sourced from students outside the self. The low learning outcomes of physics are derived from students in
self own namely about factors in readiness students receive lessons and low capacity to think in understanding the concept of physics. Features the subject matter of physics that tend to use
the language of mathematics, really needs logical mathematical ability. Besides ability logical, allegedly faaktir another that can meningkatkaan learning outcomes of physics are
mkinat student learning. The interest of learning and logical the results of the ability of mathematics viewed important and urgent change to find its relation
According to Hilgard in Tongkonoo , 218 2014: said that interest is a tendency that is fixed to attention and memory of some activity. Activity observed someone will be noticed
continuous accompanied by some of the pleasure and from this will obtain kepuasaan. A lack of interest students against subjects physics also can be caused because students sometimes
prosecuted only to memorize formula and apply the use of the recipe in questions have been exercises in. T hey did not understand the concept underlying these formulas .They just curled
