Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015
ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3
Physics Education Page 286
from populations with normal distribution and a rival hypothesis that the distribution is not normal.
Homogeneity Test: Test of homogeneity in the study conducted by Bartlet test. Using the testing criteria as follows: If x
hitung
x
table
the variant data is homogeneous, if x
hitung
x
table
the variant data is not homogeneous. This analysis aims to examine whether the assumptions for
ANOVA applies, if all variants have the same variance. Hypothesis test is the variance of the four sample groups did not differ from each other. II.
3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Result
3.1.1. Description of Research
Data to determine the grouping of high motivation to learn and motivation to learn to use a lower scoring techniques with the class interval formula Kadir, 2010: 18. Number of valid
point statement on the motivation to learn the instrument is 31, the highest score is 5 and the lowest score is 1. So the total possible highest score is 155 5x31, together with the lowest
score is 31 1x31. So long intervals derived class is 62 155-31 2 = 62. Based on the results
of the analysis, it can be determined the following categoriesμ λ3 ≤ x 155 learning motivation high, 31 ≤ x λ3 low learning motivation Student Learning Achievement Group
Using Cooperative Learning Model Type Think Pair Share TPS. Results of the study group of students using cooperative learning model Think Pair Share TPS has jumalah mahsiswa
32, the highest score of 96, the lowest score of 58, the mean score of the group is 79, and the standard deviation of 12.4997 8125.
3.1.2. Student Learning Achievement Group Using Conventional Learning Model.
Results of the study group of students using conventional learning models have a student population of 32, the highest score of 92, the lowest score of 62, the mean score of the group
was 75.28125 and the standard deviation of 8.86178.
3.1.3. Student Learning Achievement Group with High Motivation.
Results of the study group of students with high learning motivation has a student population of 32, the highest score of 96, the lowest score of 64, the mean score of the group was
82.6875 and the standard deviation of10.40296. Student Learning Achievement Group with Low Motivation. Results of the study group of students with low learning motivation has a
student population of 32, the highest score of 88, the lowest score of 58, a mean score of the group and the standard deviation is 72.40625 9.01918. Student Learning Achievement Group
Using Cooperative Learning Model TPS Type with High Motivation. Results of the study group of students with high learning motivation has a number of 16 students, the highest score
of 96, the lowest score of 78, the mean score of the group was 89.75 and the standard deviation of 5.49545.
3.1.4. Student Learning Achievement Group Using Cooperative Learning Model TPS Type with Low Motivation.
Results of the study group of students with low learning motivation has a number of 16 students, the highest score of 84, the lowest score of 58, the average score was 69.875 and the
group standard deviation of 8.91347.
Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015
ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3
Physics Education Page 287
3.1.4. Using Student Learning Achievement Group Learning Model Conventional Motivation High
