THE STUDENTS’ PRESENCE LIST DURING CONDUCTING THE RESEARCH AT THE EIGHTH GRADE (CONTROL GROUP) OF SMP NEGERI 5 NAMOHALU ESIWA IN 2015/2016
THE STUDENTS’ PRESENCE LIST DURING CONDUCTING THE RESEARCH AT THE EIGHTH GRADE (CONTROL GROUP) OF SMP NEGERI 5 NAMOHALU ESIWA IN 2015/2016
Signature NO
Meeting I
Meeting II
1. Agrina Gea
2. Agus Nirman Putri Harefa
3. Amperlin Gea
4. Atanasius Berkat Gea
5. Ayu Putri Harefa
6. Astriani Harefa
7. Beli Finto Zalukhu
8. Berkat Iman Jaya Gea
9. Berkat Nobuala Gea
10. Boby Martinus Gea
11. Dedi Krisman Gea
12. Elman Gea
13. Iwan Setiawan Gea
14. Jernih Putri Harefa
15. Kristian Gea
16. Noverius Gea
17. Nud Mei Elfitri Gea
18. Putri Damai Agusniat Gea
19. Sariani Harefa
20. Setia Nova Putra Gea
21. Siska Adventi Gea
22. Syukur Irawan Gea
23. Terima Gea
24. Teti Warni Gea
25. Victor Julius Gea
26. Yakini Gea
27. Yarmanata Gea
28. Meni Benia Zalukhu
29. Restui Harefa
30. Yasrizal Zalukhu
Approved by: The Teacher-Collaborator,
The researcher,
AGUSMIN TELAUMBANUA, S.Pd SEFRI ROSNIAT LASE
NIP. -
NIM. 112108084
Appendix 9
Table 10
THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
(Pre Test for Experimental Group)
Achievement The Students' Level of the NO
Aspect of Scoring
Students' Names
Content Organization Vocabulary Language Mechanic
Score
Mark
Students' Ability
1 Celsis Sokhiyani Gea 20 15 10 15 3 63 63 Adequate Level 2 Darni Murni Yanti Gea
25 10 15 10 4 64 64 Adequate Level 3 Dewi Putri Lase
15 15 10 15 2 57 57 Adequate Level 4 Dingkar Likeme Harefa
25 15 15 15 5 75 75 Good Level 5 Doli Hartono Gea
15 10 10 10 2 47 47 Less Level 6 Ernita Gea
20 10 15 10 3 58 58 Adequate Level 7 Fenni Indiani Ziliwu
20 15 10 15 4 64 64 Adequate Level 8 Fibi Putri Sari Gea
15 10 15 15 3 58 58 Adequate Level 9 Idarwati Gea
15 15 10 10 2 52 52 Less Level 10 Ingatmasa Gea
20 10 15 10 3 58 58 Adequate Level 11 Irwanto Putra Gea
15 5 5 10 2 37 37 Fail Level 12 Julius Gea
20 15 15 10 4 64 64 Adequate Level 13 Kasmarniat Lahagu
15 5 10 15 2 47 47 Less Level 14 Kristin Tri Putri Gea
20 5 15 10 1 51 51 Less Level 15 Kriswanto Gea
20 15 10 5 2 52 52 Less Level 16 Leo Hidayat Fatalan Gea
25 20 15 10 4 74 74 Good Level 17 Marthin Kusman Zendrato
20 15 15 15 3 68 68 Adequate Level 18 Mawar Putri Yani Gea
20 15 10 15 3 63 63 Adequate Level 19 Noni Putri Sari Harefa
15 10 15 10 2 52 52 Less Level 20 Paskalena Gea
15 15 10 10 3 53 53 Less Level 21 Rida Yanti Gea
15 5 5 10 2 37 37 Fail Level 22 Riniwati Gea
20 15 10 15 3 63 63 Adequate Level 23 Serlina Gea
15 5 5 10 1 36 36 Fail Level 24 Sri Juwita Gea
20 15 10 15 3 63 63 Adequate Level
25 Tetiari Lase 15 10 10 15 2 52 52 Less Level 26 Tri Love Putrawan Gea
15 15 10 10 3 53 53 Less Level 27 Wibi Berkat Tiani Gea
15 5 10 10 1 41 41 Less Level 28 Yani Wati Gea
15 10 5 10 2 42 42 Less Level 29 Yefi Kristiani Gea
20 15 10 10 3 58 58 Adequate Level 30 Yuyun Nasrani Gea
15 10 5 10 2 42 42 Less Level
mean ( X̅)
54.8 Less Level
Explanation: a.
Maximum Score = 100 b. The level of the students' ability in writing narrative text:
85 - 100 : Very good level 75 - 84 : Good level 60 - 74 : Adequate level 40 - 59 : Less level
0 - 39 : Fail level
Appendix 10
Table 11
THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
(Pre Test for Control Group)
Achievement The Students' Level of the NO
Aspect of Scoring
Students' Names
Content OrganizationVocabulary Language Mechanic
Score
Mark Students'
1 Agrina Gea 15 10 5 15 2 47 47 Less Level 2 Agus Nirman Putri Harefa
20 10 15 5 2 52 52 Less Level 3 Amperlin Gea
15 5 10 15 2 47 47 Less Level 4 Atanasius Berkat Gea
20 15 15 15 1 66 66 Adequate Level 5 Ayu Putri Harefa
15 10 5 10 2 42 42 Less Level 6 Astriani Harefa
20 10 15 10 3 58 58 Less Level 7 Beli Finto Zalukhu
15 10 5 10 3 43 43 Less Level 8 Berkat Iman Jaya Gea
20 10 10 15 3 58 58 Less Level 9 Berkat Nobuala Gea
15 10 15 5 2 47 47 Less Level 10 Boby Martinus Gea
15 15 10 5 3 48 48 Less Level 11 Dedi Krisman Gea
15 10 5 10 2 42 42 Less Level 12 Elman Gea
15 5 5 5 1 31 31 Fail Level 13 Iwan Setiawan Gea
15 10 5 10 1 41 41 Less Level 14 Jernih Putri Harefa
15 5 10 15 2 47 47 Less Level 15 Meni Benia Zalukhu
15 10 5 10 3 43 43 Less Level 16 Kristian Gea
15 10 5 10 2 42 42 Less Level 17 Noverius Gea
15 10 5 10 2 42 42 Less Level 18 Nud Mei Elfitri Gea
15 5 10 15 1 46 46 Less Level 19 Restui Harefa
15 5 15 15 2 52 52 Less Level 20 Putri Damai Agusniat Gea
15 20 10 10 2 57 57 Less Level 21 Sariani Harefa
15 5 15 10 3 48 48 Less Level 22 Setia Nova Putra Gea
15 10 5 15 1 46 46 Less Level 23 Siska Adventi Gea
20 10 10 10 2 52 52 Less Level 24 Syukur Irawan Gea
15 5 15 10 3 48 48 Less Level
25 Terima Gea 15 10 5 15 2 47 47 Less Level 26 Teti Warni Gea
15 5 5 5 2 32 32 Fail Level 27 Victor Julius Gea
15 5 10 10 2 42 42 Less Level 28 Yakini Gea
20 10 5 10 2 47 47 Less Level 29 Yarmanata Gea
15 5 10 10 1 41 41 Less Level 30 Yasrizal Zalukhu
15 5 5 15 2 42 42 Less Level
mean ( X̅)
46.53 Less Level
Explanation: a.
Maximum Score = 100 b. The level of the students' ability in writing narrative text:
85 - 100 : Very good level 75 - 84 : Good level 60 - 74 : Adequate level 40 - 59 : Less level
0 - 39 : Fail level
Appendix 11
Table 12
THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
(Post Test for Experimental Group)
Achievement The Students' Level of the NO
Aspect of Scoring
Students' Names
Content Organization Vocabulary Language Mechanic
Score
Mark
Students' Ability
1 Celsis Sokhiyani Gea 25 20 15 20 4 84 84 Good Level 2 Darni Murni Yanti Gea
20 20 20 15 5 80 80 Good Level 3 Dewi Putri Lase
20 15 20 15 3 73 73 Adequate Level 4 Dingkar Likeme Harefa
30 20 20 20 4 94 94 Very Good Level 5 Doli Hartono Gea
15 15 15 20 3 68 68 Adequate Level 6 Ernita Gea
20 10 15 20 3 68 68 Adequate Level 7 Fenni Indiani Ziliwu
25 15 15 20 4 79 79 Good Level 8 Fibi Putri Sari Gea
20 15 15 15 2 67 67 Adequate Level 9 Idarwati Gea
20 10 15 15 1 61 61 Adequate Level 10 Ingatmasa Gea
20 15 10 20 1 66 66 Adequate Level 11 Irwanto Putra Gea
20 10 20 15 3 68 68 Adequate Level 12 Julius Gea
25 20 20 15 2 82 82 Good Level 13 Kasmarniat Lahagu
20 15 15 15 2 67 67 Adequate Level 14 Kristin Tri Putri Gea
20 15 20 10 3 68 68 Adequate Level 15 Kriswanto Gea
25 15 20 15 3 78 78 Good Level 16 Leo Hidayat Fatalan Gea
30 20 20 25 3 98 98 Very Good Level 17 Marthin Kusman Zendrato
25 20 20 20 3 88 88 Very Good Level 18 Mawar Putri Yani Gea
25 15 20 20 3 83 83 Good Level 19 Noni Putri Sari Harefa
20 15 15 15 3 68 68 Adequate Level 20 Paskalena Gea
20 15 15 20 2 72 72 Adequate Level 21 Rida Yanti Gea
15 20 15 20 2 72 72 Adequate Level 22 Riniwati Gea
25 15 15 20 3 78 78 Good Level 23 Serlina Gea
20 15 20 10 2 67 67 Adequate Level 24 Sri Juwita Gea
20 15 20 15 3 73 73 Adequate Level
25 Tetiari Lase 15 20 15 15 2 67 67 Adequate Level 26 Tri Love Putrawan Gea
20 15 15 10 3 63 63 Adequate Level 27 Wibi Berkat Tiani Gea
20 15 15 15 2 67 67 Adequate Level 28 Yani Wati Gea
20 15 10 20 2 67 67 Adequate Level 29 Yefi Kristiani Gea
25 20 15 15 4 79 79 Good Level 30 Yuyun Nasrani Gea
25 15 15 20 3 78 78 Good Level
mean ( X̅)
74.1 Adequate Level
Explanation: a.
Maximum Score = 100 b. The level of the students' ability in writing narrative text:
85 - 100 : Very good level 75 - 84 : Good level 60 - 74 : Adequate level 40 - 59 : Less level
0 - 39 : Fail level
Appendix 12
Table 13
THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
(Post Test for Control Group)
Achievement The Students' Level of the NO
Aspect of Scoring
Students' Names
Content OrganizationVocabulary Language Mechanic
Score
Mark Students'
1 Agrina Gea 20 15 15 20 2 72 72 Adequate Level 2 Agus Nirman Putri Harefa
20 15 15 15 2 67 67 Less Level 3 Amperlin Gea
20 15 15 10 2 62 62 Less Level 4 Atanasius Berkat Gea
25 15 20 25 4 89 89 Good Level 5 Ayu Putri Harefa
20 15 15 15 0 65 65 Less Level 6 Astriani Harefa
20 15 15 10 5 65 65 Less Level 7 Beli Finto Zalukhu
20 15 10 15 3 63 63 Adequate Level 8 Berkat Iman Jaya Gea
20 15 20 10 3 68 68 Less Level 9 Berkat Nobuala Gea
20 15 20 10 0 65 65 Less Level 10 Boby Martinus Gea
25 20 20 15 4 84 84 Less Level 11 Dedi Krisman Gea
20 20 20 15 0 75 75 Good Level 12 Elman Gea
20 15 20 10 3 68 68 Adequate Level 13 Iwan Setiawan Gea
20 10 20 15 2 67 67 Less Level 14 Jernih Putri Harefa
25 20 20 15 2 82 82 Less Level 15 Meni Benia Zalukhu
25 15 20 15 0 75 75 Less Level 16 Kristian Gea
25 15 20 15 3 79 79 Adequate Level 17 Noverius Gea
25 20 20 15 4 84 84 Good Level 18 Nud Mei Elfitri Gea
25 15 20 15 5 80 80 Good Level 19 Restui Harefa
20 15 20 10 3 68 68 Less Level 20 Putri Damai Agusniat Gea
20 15 15 15 4 69 69 Less Level 21 Sariani Harefa
20 15 20 10 3 68 68 Fail Level 22 Setia Nova Putra Gea
20 15 20 10 3 62 62 Adequate Level 23 Siska Adventi Gea
20 15 20 10 3 66 66 Fail Level 24 Syukur Irawan Gea
20 15 15 10 2 62 62 Adequate Level
25 Terima Gea 25 20 20 15 2 82 82 Less Level 26 Teti Warni Gea
20 10 20 15 2 67 67 Fail Level 27 Victor Julius Gea
20 15 10 15 3 63 63 Less Level 28 Yakini Gea
20 15 15 10 5 65 65 Less Level 29 Yarmanata Gea
20 10 20 15 2 67 67 Less Level 30 Yasrizal Zalukhu
20 15 20 10 3 68 68 Less Level
mean ( X̅)
70.57 Adequate Level
Explanation: a.
Maximum Score = 100 b. The level of the students' ability in writing narrative text:
85 - 100 : Very good level 75 - 84 : Good level 60 - 74 : Adequate level 40 - 59 : Less level
0 - 39 : Fail level
Appendix 13
Table 15
THE STANDARD DEVIATION OF THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
(Pre Test for Experimental Group)
NO Students' Names X X²
1 Celsis Sokhiyani Gea 63 3969 2 Darni Murni Yanti Gea
64 4096 3 Dewi Putri Lase
57 3249 4 Dingkar Likeme Harefa
75 5625 5 Doli Hartono Gea
47 2209 6 Ernita Gea
58 3364 7 Fenni Indiani Ziliwu
64 4096 8 Fibi Putri Sari Gea
58 3364 9 Idarwati Gea
52 2704 10 Ingatmasa Gea
58 3364 11 Irwanto Putra Gea
37 1369 12 Julius Gea
64 4096 13 Kasmarniat Lahagu
47 2209 14 Kristin Tri Putri Gea
51 2601 15 Kriswanto Gea
52 2704 16 Leo Hidayat Fatalan Gea
74 5476 17 Marthin Kusman Zendrato
68 4624 18 Mawar Putri Yani Gea
63 3969 19 Noni Putri Sari Harefa
52 2704 20 Paskalena Gea
53 2809 21 Rida Yanti Gea
37 1369 22 Riniwati Gea
63 3969 23 Serlina Gea
36 1296 24 Sri Juwita Gea
63 3969 25 Tetiari Lase
52 2704 26 Tri Love Putrawan Gea
53 2809 27 Wibi Berkat Tiani Gea
41 1681 28 Yani Wati Gea
42 1764 29 Yefi Kristiani Gea
58 3364 30 Yuyun Nasrani Gea
1644 93290 n = 30 Standard Deviation (S)
Sum (∑)
Based on the table in the previous page, Where:
∑ = 1644 ∑X 2 = 93290
n = 30
The standard deviation (s) of Pre Test for Experimental Group = 10.50
Based on the table in the previous page, Where:
The standard deviation (s) of Pre Test for Control Group = 7.22
Based on the table in the previous page, Where:
∑ = 2223 ∑X 2 = 167113
n = 30
The standard deviation (s) of Post Test for Experimental Group = 9.08
Based on the table in the previous page, Where:
∑ = 2117 ∑X 2 = 151119
n = 30
The standard deviation (s) of Post Test for Control Group = 7.72
Appendix 14
Table 15
THE STANDARD DEVIATION OF THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING
(Pre Test for Control Group)
NO Students' Names X X²
1 Agrina Gea 47 2209 2 Agus Nirman Putri Harefa
52 2704 3 Amperlin Gea
47 2209 4 Atanasius Berkat Gea
66 4356 5 Ayu Putri Harefa
42 1764 6 Astriani Harefa
58 3364 7 Beli Finto Zalukhu
43 1849 8 Berkat Iman Jaya Gea
58 3364 9 Berkat Nobuala Gea
47 2209 10 Boby Martinus Gea
48 2304 11 Dedi Krisman Gea
42 1764 12 Elman Gea
31 961 13 Iwan Setiawan Gea
41 1681 14 Jernih Putri Harefa
47 2209 15 Meni Benia Zalukhu
43 1849 16 Kristian Gea
42 1764 17 Noverius Gea
42 1764 18 Nud Mei Elfitri Gea
46 2116 19 Restui Harefa
52 2704 20 Putri Damai Agusniat Gea
57 3249 21 Sariani Harefa
48 2304 22 Setia Nova Putra Gea
46 2116 23 Siska Adventi Gea
52 2704 24 Syukur Irawan Gea
48 2304 25 Terima Gea
47 2209 26 Teti Warni Gea
32 1024 27 Victor Julius Gea
42 1764 28 Yakini Gea
47 2209 29 Yarmanata Gea
41 1681 30 Yasrizal B. Zalukhu
66472 n = 30 Standard Deviation (S)
Sum (∑)
Appendix 15
Table 16
THE STANDARD DEVIATION OF THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
(Post Test for Experimental Group)
NO Students' Names X X²
1 Celsis Sokhiyani Gea 84 7056 2 Darni Murni Yanti Gea
80 6400 3 Dewi Putri Lase
73 5329 4 Dingkar Likeme Harefa
94 8836 5 Doli Hartono Gea
68 4624 6 Ernita Gea
68 4624 7 Fenni Indiani Ziliwu
79 6241 8 Fibi Putri Sari Gea
67 4489 9 Idarwati Gea
61 3721 10 Ingatmasa Gea
66 4356 11 Irwanto Putra Gea
68 4624 12 Julius Gea
82 6724 13 Kasmarniat Lahagu
67 4489 14 Kristin Tri Putri Gea
68 4624 15 Kriswanto Gea
78 6084 16 Leo Hidayat Fatalan Gea
98 9604 17 Marthin Kusman Zendrato
88 74 18 Mawar Putri Yani Gea
83 6889 19 Noni Putri Sari Harefa
68 4624 20 Paskalena Gea
72 5184 21 Rida Yanti Gea
72 5184 22 Riniwati Gea
78 6084 23 Serlina Gea
67 4489 24 Sri Juwita Gea
73 5329 25 Tetiari Lase
67 4489 26 Tri Love Putrawan Gea
63 3969 27 Wibi Berkat Tiani Gea
67 4489 28 Yani Wati Gea
67 4489 29 Yefi Kristiani Gea
79 6241 30 Yuyun Nasrani Gea
2223 167113 n = 30 Standard Deviation (S)
Sum (∑)
Appendix 16
Table 17
THE STANDARD DEVIATION OF THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN
(Post Test for Control Group)
NO Students' Names X X²
1 Agrina Gea 72 5184 2 Agus Nirman Putri Harefa
67 4489 3 Amperlin Gea
62 3844 4 Atanasius Berkat Gea
89 7921 5 Ayu Putri Harefa
65 4225 6 Astriani Harefa
65 4225 7 Beli Finto Zalukhu
63 3969 8 Berkat Iman Jaya Gea
68 4624 9 Berkat Nobuala Gea
65 4225 10 Boby Martinus Gea
84 7056 11 Dedi Krisman Gea
75 5625 12 Elman Gea
68 4624 13 Iwan Setiawan Gea
67 4489 14 Jernih Putri Harefa
82 6724 15 Meni Benia Zalukhu
75 5625 16 Kristian Gea
79 6241 17 Noverius Gea
84 7056 18 Nud Mei Elfitri Gea
80 6400 19 Restui Harefa
68 4624 20 Putri Damai Agusniat Gea
69 4761 21 Sariani Harefa
68 4624 22 Setia Nova Putra Gea
62 3844 23 Siska Adventi Gea
66 4356 24 Syukur Irawan Gea
62 3844 25 Terima Gea
82 6724 26 Teti Warni Gea
67 4489 27 Victor Julius Gea
63 3969 28 Yakini Gea
65 4225 29 Yarmanata Gea
67 4489 30 Yasrizal B. Zalukhu
Sum (∑) 2117 151119 n = 30 Standard Deviation (S)
Appendix 17
Table 18
THE NORMALITY OF THE SAMPLE DATA OF THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
(Pre Test for Experimental Group)
S(Zi)
[F(Z i ) - S(Z i ) ]
L count = L o
L table = L 0.05 (30)
0,161 NORMAL
Conclusion (Normal = L count ≤ Ltable
DISTRIBUTION
To get L table for x=0.05 n=30 can be done as follows:
L table = √
= 0, 161
Because of L count (-0,0894) ≤ L table (0,61), so the data of pre test for Experimental Group are stated having NORMAL DISTRIBUTION.
To get L table for x=0.05 n=30 can be done as follows:
L table = √
= 0, 161
Because of L count (-0.1874) ≤L table (0,61), so the data of pre test for Control Group were stated having NORMAL DISTRIBUTION.
To get L table for x=0.05 n=30 can be done as follows:
L table = √
= 0, 161
Because of L count (-0,2153) ≤ L table (0,61), so the data of post test for Experimental Group were stated having NORMAL DISTRIBUTION.
To get L table for x=0.05 n=30 can be done as follows:
L table = √
Because of L count (-0,1960) ≤L table (0,61), so the data of post test for Control Group were stated having NORMAL DISTRIBUTION.
Appendix 18
Table 19
THE NORMALITY OF THE SAMPLE DATA OF THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
(Pre Test for Control Group)
S(Zi)
[F(Z i ) - S(Z i ) ]
L count = L o
L table = L 0.05 (30)
0,161 NORMAL
Conclusion (Normal = L count ≤ Ltable
DISTRIBUTION
Table 20
THE NORMALITY OF THE SAMPLE DATA OF THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
(Post Test for Experimental Group)
S(Zi)
[F(Z i ) - S(Z i ) ]
L count = L o
-0,2153
L table = L 0.05 (30)
0,161 NORMAL
Conclusion (Normal = L count ≤ Ltable
DISTRIBUTION
128
Table 21
THE NORMALITY OF THE SAMPLE DATA OF THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
(Post Test for Control Group)
S(Zi)=
[F(Z i ) - S(Z i ) ]
L count = L o
L table = L 0.05 (30)
0,161 NORMAL
Conclusion (Normal = L count ≤ Ltable
DISTRIBUTION
Appendix 21 THE HOMOGENEITY OF THE SAMPLE IN PRE TEST
To examine the homogeneity of the sample in pre test, the researcher uses Harley Test as follows:
1. Determining the greatest variance and smallest variance.
a. Based on Table 12 (13) is known: ∑
= 1644 ∑X 2 = 93290
n = 30
2 = S 110.3
b. Based on Table 13 (14) is known: ∑
= 1396 ∑X 2 = 66472
2 = S 52.1
Based on the computation above, so: The greatest variance = 110.3 The smallest variance = 52.1
2. Determining F count by using the formula as follows:
F count =
3. Determining F table as follows:
F table = F a (n the greatest variant- 1.n the smallest variant -1)
F table =F 0.05(30-1, 30-1)
F table =F
F table = 1.846
4. Taking conclusion Because of F count (2.1) < F table (1.846), so the research sample is stated
HOMOGENEOUS.
Appendix 22 THE HOMOGENEITY OF THE SAMPLE IN POST TEST
To examine the homogeneity of the sample in post test, the researcher uses Harley Test as follows:
1. Determining the greatest variance and smallest variance.
a. Based on Table 14 (15) is known: ∑
= 2223 ∑X 2 = 167113
n = 30
2 = S 82.4
b. Based on Table 15 (16) is known: ∑
= 2117 ∑X 2 = 151119
2 = S 59.63
Based on the computation above, so: The greatest variance = 82.4 The smallest variance = 59.63
2. Determining F count by using the formula as follows:
F count =
3. Determining F table as follows:
F table = F a (n the greatest variant- 1.n the smallest variant -1)
F table =F 0.05(30-1, 30-1)
F table =F
F table = 1.846
4. Taking conclusion Because of F count (1.38) < F table (1.846), so the research sample is stated
HOMOGENEOUS.
Appendix 23 EXAMINING THE HYPOTHESIS
The hypothesis in the research as follows: Ha : There is a significant effect of Summary Pyramid Strategy on the
Students’ Ability in Writing Narrative Text at the eighth grade of SMP Negeri 5 Namohalu Esiwa.
Ho : There is no a significant effect of Summary Pyramid Strategy on the Students’ Ability in Writing Narrative Text at the eighth grade of SMP
Negeri 5 Namohalu Esiwa in 2015/2016. And the formulation of hypothesis that is examined by using t- Test independent as follows: Ho : µ 1 = µ 2
H a :µ 1 ≠µ 2
The score of t table was gotten by:
dk = 2 (n-1) = 2 (30-1) = 58
And the significance level is 5% (α= 0.05), so t table = t 1/2α(dk) =t 1/2 (0.05) (58) = 1.45. So, the statistics of testing hypothesis by using t-Test Independen as follows:
136
t count = 1.62 Based on the computation from the previous page, we got t table =
1.45 and t
count
= 1.62. Because of t count = 1.62 is not exist between the interval -1.45 to 1.45 (-
1.45 ≤ t ≤ 1.45), so Ha is acceptable and H 0 is unacceptable.
Appendix 24a