Vision and Mission The Characteristics of Respondents

50 Mission of Unilever is :  Be the first and the best in its class to meet the needs and aspirations of consumers.  Eliminate the value-added activities of all processes.  Be selected company for people with high performance.  Aimed at improving profitable growth targets and deliver a return on the average shareholders and employees.  Get the honor because of high integrity, care to the community and the environment

3. The Characteristics of Respondents

The population in this research is encompassed the students of Budi Luhur University, Jakarta put on special SOAP lifebuoy. While the number of the selected sample as many as 70 of respondents with particular consideration. This is because the researchers had some limitations in the research, such as cost, time, and effort. Furthermore, for the faculty or Department of the respondent can be seen in table 4.1 below : 51 Table 4.1 FacultiesRespondent Faculties Frequency Percentage FEIS 18 25.7 FST 32 45.7 FIKOM 13 18.6 FISIP 2 2.9 FT 5 7.1 Total 70 100 Source: Data is processed, 2013 Table 4.1 above shows that the respondents are students from the Faculty of Economics and Business, i.e. as many as 6 or as many as 25.7 of respondents, a student of the Faculty of Science and Technology as much as 32 of respondents, or as many as 45,7 students of Faculty of Computer Science as much as 18.6 or respondents 15, students of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Politics as much as 2 or as many as 2.9 of respondents, and the remaining students of the Faculty of Engineering is 5 respondents or by 7.1. In the meantime, to know Lifebuoy SOAP products which is used by students of Budi Luhur, Jakarta can be seen in table 2.6 below: 52 Table 4.2 Products That Use Lifebuoy Frekuensi Persentase liquid soap 41 58.5 Solid soap 29 41.5 Total 70 100 Source: Data is processed, 2013 On the data table 4.2 above illustrates that a product that is used by the majority of Lifebuoy students is liquid soap, which is as many as 41 respondents or as much as 58.5. The rest are students that uses solid SOAP, which is as many as 29 respondents or as much as 41.5. This shows that the majority of the students of Budi Luhur, Jakarta using liquid soap. In the meantime, to find out if any of the respondents purchase a fragrance fragrance is the same on every purchase can be seen in table 4.3 below: Table 4.3 Tendency Of Choosing Fragrance Fragrance Is The Same In Every Lifebuoy Purchase Frequency Percentage Yes 29 41.5 No 41 58.5 Total 70 100 Source: Data is processed , 2013 53 Based on the above table, explained that the tendency of respondents to use fragrance fragrance is the same in every purchase of Lifebuoy, i.e. as many as 29 respondents voted Yes or as much as 41.5. The rest of the respondents who voted no, i.e. as many as 41 respondents or as much as 36.4, 1. This shows that the majority of respondents used the fragrance fragrance that vary on each purchase Lifebuoy. In the meantime, to find out the number of times respondents buy Lux in every month can be seen in table 4.4 below: Table 4.4 How Many Times Did Purchase LifebuoyIn Each Month Frequency Percentage 1x moon 29 41.5 1x moon 41 58.5 Total 70 100 Source: Data is processed , 2013 Based on table 4.4 above, explained that the majority of respondents make a purchase more than one time purchase in each month, i.e. as many as 41 respondents or as much as 58.5. The rest are respondents who make purchases once each month, i.e. as many as 29 respondents or as much as 411.5. It is shows that the majority of respondents make a purchase more than one product Lifebuoy times per month in each purchase. 54

B. Result and Discussion

1. Validities and Reliabilities

In this study, the author uses primary data obtained by disseminating a questionnaire to students in different faculties of Budi Luhur as many as 70 people. Prior to dissemination of the questionnaire respondents, the researchers conducted a test questionnaire to provide respondents with 20 questions as much as 39 questions to test the level of validity and reliability of all such questions. This questionnaire is divided into 3 variables, namely celebrity endorser, brand image, and the perception of consumers. Then each variable is divided into a number of indicators. After conducted trials against 20 respondents, then the result can be seen in table 4 below: Table 4.5 Result of Validity and Reliability test Celebrity Endorser Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item- Total Correlation Cronbachs Alpha if Item Deleted CE_1 35,9429 18,721 ,696 ,821 CE_2 35,8571 20,443 ,535 ,836 CE_3 35,9857 19,290 ,536 ,833 CE_4 35,9857 19,290 ,536 ,833 CE_5 35,9000 18,932 ,601 ,827 CE_6 36,1143 18,885 ,567 ,830 CE_7 36,8286 17,043 ,492 ,849 CE_8 35,9000 18,932 ,601 ,827 CE_9 36,2571 18,310 ,508 ,837 CE_10 36,1286 18,838 ,587 ,828 Source: Processed primary data by SPSS 20.0 55 Based on table 4.5, 20 Question about celebrity endorser, from the table, it can be seen that all the question is valid, because the score of coefficient correlation α 0,30, it means the data is valid and have the positive correlation or the score corrected item-total correlation is 0,30, it means the valid Sugiono, 2008:126. Measurement result is stated to be reliable if the coefficient α 0.60 Imam Ghozali,2009:42 from table 4.5, the value of Cronbach alpha more than 0,06, it means 10 question of celebrity endorser have reliabilities value a good and feasible. Table 4.6 Result of Validity and Reliability test Brand image Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item- Total Correlation Cronbachs Alpha if Item Deleted BI_1 20,4286 7,321 ,564 ,885 BI_2 19,7286 9,302 ,665 ,838 BI_3 19,7571 8,389 ,724 ,823 BI_4 19,5429 8,455 ,872 ,804 BI_5 19,5000 9,645 ,465 ,867 BI_6 19,5429 8,455 ,872 ,804 Source: Processed primary data by SPSS 20.0 Based on table 4.6, 20 Question about Brand image, from the table, it can be seen that all the question is valid, because the score of coefficient correlation α 0,30, it means the data is valid and have the positive correlation or the score corrected item-total correlation is 0,30, it means the valid Sugiono, 2008:126.