Defining a project Theoretical Description 1. Speaking

xliv There is another definition of project based learning which is different from similar to Project Work. It is Project Based Learning PBL which is recommended from http:en.wikipedia.orgwikiProject-based_learning . It is stated that PBL is the use of classroom projects, intended to bring about deep learning, where students use technology and inquiry to engage with issues and questions that are relevant to their lives. Furthermore, he also said that Project-based learning PBL is: An approach for classroom activity that emphasizes learning activities that are long-term, interdisciplinary and student-centered. This approach is generally less structured than traditional, teacher-led classroom activities; in a project-based class, students must often organize their own work and manage their own time. Within the project based learning framework, students collaborate, working together to make sense of what is going on. Based on the definitions of project works by some experts, the writer concluded that Project Work is a set of teaching strategies which enable teachers to guide students through in-depth studies of real world topics leading a great way to have learners work together. It makes students highly motivated, feel actively involved in their own learning, and produce work of a high quality.

b. Defining a project

Fried-Booth 1986: 6-7 distinguishes between the two main elements of defining a project, they are full-scale projects and bridging or motivating activities. The main difference between the two is that motivating activities are xlv restricted to the classroom, while project work is extended beyond the classroom. A full scales project involves three stages. They are: 1. Classroom planning. The students, in collaboration with the teacher, discuss the content and scope of their project, and predict their specific language needs, for example discussing projected interview visits, ways of gathering material-pamphlets, brochures, illustrations, etc. 2. Carrying out the project. The students move out of the classroom to perform whatever tasks they have planned, for example conducting interview, making recordings, gathering printed and visual material. At this stage they will be using all four skills reading, writing, speaking and listening in a naturally integrated way. 3. Reviewing and monitoring the work. This includes discussions and feedback sessions, both during and after the project. While bridging or motivating strategies is important that students should have access to other activities, which do not necessarily involve all four skills and which do not need to be extended beyond the classroom. They are specifically designed to develop receptiveness to project work. Below is a short list of some of the bridging activities: Control use of language communicative activities e.g. information-gap Games role play e.g. shopping mini real-world tasks e.g. getting train times from the station Assignments e.g. researching in A library, reporting back Bridging activities simulations e.g. Newspaper front less controlled page video e.g. Food labels: pin workauthentic and thread display materials brought xlvi to class; small projects ‗Free‘ use of language full-scale projects e.g. Good wheelchair guide

c. Developing the Project

Dokumen yang terkait

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH CHART AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMKN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

0 4 167

improving reading ability using students’ texts ( a classroom action research at the second year of SMK Farmasi Bina Farma Madiun in 2007 2008 Academic Year)

0 14 296

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PROFICIENCY THROUGH PAIRED STORYTELLING (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMK Bhinneka Karya in the Academic Year 2008 2009)

0 7 102

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH SEMANTIC MAPPING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE FIFTH YEAR OF SD N I DELANGGU IN 2008/2009 ACADEMIC YEAR).

0 2 8

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH GROUP WORK AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA N 8 SURAKARTA (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH).

0 0 6

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH SEMANTIC MAPPING IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH SEMANTIC MAPPING A Classroom Action Research of the Tenth Grade Students in SMK Negeri 2 Karanganyar in the Academic Year 2009 / 2010).

0 0 17

INTRODUCTION IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH SEMANTIC MAPPING A Classroom Action Research of the Tenth Grade Students in SMK Negeri 2 Karanganyar in the Academic Year 2009 / 2010).

0 0 12

IMPROVTEL IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING STORY TELLING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 2 GROGOL IN 2010/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR).

0 2 14

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH BAMBOO DANCE TECHNIQUE (A Classroom Action Research at Tenth Grade Students of SMAN 4 Purwokerto in Academic Year 20142015)

0 1 13

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH TASK- BASED LEARNING (A Classroom Action Research on the Second Grade Students of SMK Wiworotomo Purwokerto in Academic Year of 20132014)

0 0 12