Rationale REVIEW ON RELATED LITERATURE

l so one should decide whether the benefits of doing project work outweigh this factor; 2 Some learners doing nothing. By giving more freedom to the learners one may also be giving them the freedom to do nothing If the project is planned carefully and roles are decided at the proposal stage this is less likely to happen; 3 Groups working at different speeds. One group may have finished the project after a couple of hours and say they have nothing to do. Remind them it is their responsibility to fill the time allocated to project work and discuss ways they could extend the work they have already completed.

f. The Steps in Project Work Planning

Haines 1989:10 proposes the steps in developing a project in the classroom that can be seen below: Developing a Project in a Language Classroom Step I: Agree on a theme for the project Step II: Determine the final outcome Step III: Structure the project Step IV: Prepare students for the language demands of Step V Step V: Gather information Step VI: Prepare students for the language demands of Step VII Step VII: Compile and analyze information Step VIII: Step: Prepare students for the language demands for Step IV Step IX: Present final product Step V: Evaluate the project Figure 3 The steps in Developing a Project in a Language Classroom

B. Rationale

For the students, speaking is probably the most difficult activities among the four skills both in their mother tongue and even in a foreign language. The fact in the writer‘s class shows that the students have low speaking ability. li The students‘ difficulties in speaking is caused by: the limited English vocabulary, low understanding about transactional and interpersonal expressions in English, low ability in constructing sentences and utterances, and low motivation in participating in speaking activity caused by the shyness and embarrassment in making mistakes. The situation is worsening by teacher‘s choice of teaching technique. The teacher still focuses on grammar-translation method. The teacher does not apply various teaching techniques in the classroom. The teacher does not promote active learning in the classroom. Limited time for speaking practice in the classroom also made the situation worse. To improve students speaking ability, the writer tries to apply project work in teaching speaking for a certain period. Projects that have depth, duration, and complexity will challenge students and motivate them towards construction of knowledge Cross: 1992. They will acquire communication, collaboration, planning, and self- evaluation skills. After completing a project, the teacher asks students to create a self-evaluation of the project. This enables the students to focus on their learning process and allows them to see their progress. Self- evaluation gives students a sense of accomplishment and further instills responsibility for learning. Besides, it encourages studen t‘s active learning. It also motivates students to practice in the classroom and enables students to use the target language in real situations. Fried-Both, 1986. Based on the characteristics of project work explained before, the researcher is certain t hat it will be able to improve students‘ English speaking ability. lii

C. Action Hypothesis

Dokumen yang terkait

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH CHART AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMKN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

0 4 167

improving reading ability using students’ texts ( a classroom action research at the second year of SMK Farmasi Bina Farma Madiun in 2007 2008 Academic Year)

0 14 296

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PROFICIENCY THROUGH PAIRED STORYTELLING (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMK Bhinneka Karya in the Academic Year 2008 2009)

0 7 102

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH SEMANTIC MAPPING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE FIFTH YEAR OF SD N I DELANGGU IN 2008/2009 ACADEMIC YEAR).

0 2 8

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH GROUP WORK AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA N 8 SURAKARTA (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH).

0 0 6

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH SEMANTIC MAPPING IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH SEMANTIC MAPPING A Classroom Action Research of the Tenth Grade Students in SMK Negeri 2 Karanganyar in the Academic Year 2009 / 2010).

0 0 17

INTRODUCTION IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH SEMANTIC MAPPING A Classroom Action Research of the Tenth Grade Students in SMK Negeri 2 Karanganyar in the Academic Year 2009 / 2010).

0 0 12

IMPROVTEL IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING STORY TELLING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 2 GROGOL IN 2010/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR).

0 2 14

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH BAMBOO DANCE TECHNIQUE (A Classroom Action Research at Tenth Grade Students of SMAN 4 Purwokerto in Academic Year 20142015)

0 1 13

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH TASK- BASED LEARNING (A Classroom Action Research on the Second Grade Students of SMK Wiworotomo Purwokerto in Academic Year of 20132014)

0 0 12